Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge rejects backdating case against former Broadcom executives

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:10 AM
Original message
Judge rejects backdating case against former Broadcom executives
Source: Associated Press

SANTA ANA — A federal judge Tuesday dismissed all charges against the remaining two defendants in the government's sweeping securities fraud case against chip maker Broadcom, citing what he called "shameful" prosecutorial misconduct and a lack of evidence.

The dismissals were a stunning reversal that elicited gasps from the courtroom and tears from Broadcom's former chief financial officer and former CEO, who had faced the prospect of years in prison if convicted.

U.S. District Judge Cormac Carney dismissed the charges two days before the jury was to begin deliberations for former CFO William Ruehle, who had pleaded not guilty to 14 counts of fraud and conspiracy related to stock-option backdating.

... "I find that the government has intimidated and improperly influenced the three witnesses critical to Mr. Ruehle's defense and the cumulative effect of that misconduct has distorted the truth-finding process," Carney said. "To submit this case to the jury would make a mockery ... of the constitutional right to due process and a fair trial."

... Tuesday's rulings were a brutal blow for the government, which obtained indictments against Nicholas and Ruehle last year after federal authorities in 2006 began investigating stock options granted by hundreds of companies. While many companies settled with the Securities and Exchange Commission, criminal cases were much less common, and they've had trouble sticking.

Read more: http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_14001020
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. how a propos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm glad the judge threw out his BS case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds like an extreme decision by the judge
From his statement: "To submit this case to the jury would make a mockery ... of the constitutional right to due process and a fair trial."

Submitting it to a jury is part of due process. The trial is a part of due process. There is also the right of appeal, which is part of due process.

However, to yank this one away for the jury really smells, at least to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC