Source:
UK telegraphTony Blair’s claim that Britain would have invaded Iraq even if he had known there were no weapons of mass destruction in the country is “very damaging”, according to the Archbishop of Canterbury.Dr Rowan Williams said the admission by the former Prime Minister, who led the country into war on the basis that Saddam Hussein's regime was a threat to the West, would further reduce the public’s trust in politics.
...
Dr Williams, the most senior cleric in the Church of England, opposed the invasion of Iraq in early 2003 and recently used a service at St Paul’s Cathedral to honour the 179 British service personnel who died in the conflict to criticise Labour’s handling of it.
He condemned the “overblown language” used to justify the mission to topple Saddam Hussein and claimed the subsequent occupation had created a “chaotic, ravaged society”.
On Wednesday, he was asked by Simon Mayo on his BBC Radio 5 Live programme what he thought of the recent disclosure by Mr Blair that he would still have thought the invasion justified even if he had known that Iraq was not developing technology that threatened other countries.
Dr Williams replied: “I think that’s a very damaging thing to say.
“That doesn’t do anything for people’s trust in public life.”
Read more:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/6826761/Tony-Blairs-new-claims-on-Iraq-invasion-are-very-damaging-says-Archbishop-of-Canterbury.html