Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who's running the TSA? No one, thanks to Sen. Jim DeMint

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:20 PM
Original message
Who's running the TSA? No one, thanks to Sen. Jim DeMint
Source: McClatchy

Who's running the TSA? No one, thanks to Sen. Jim DeMint
Margaret Talev | McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON — An attempt to blow up a trans-Atlantic flight from Amsterdam to Detroit on Christmas Day would be all-consuming for the administrator of the Transportation Security Administration — if there were one.

The post remains vacant because Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., has held up President Barack Obama's nominee in opposition to the prospect of TSA workers joining a labor union.

As al Qaida claimed responsibility Monday for the thwarted attack and President Barack Obama made a public statement about it, Democrats urged DeMint to drop his objection and allow quick confirmation of nominee Erroll Southers, a counterterrorism expert, when the Senate reconvenes in three weeks.

Obama, speaking from Hawaii, where he and his family are vacationing, told Americans, "We will not rest until we find all who were involved and hold them accountable."

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/81356.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Luckily the terrorists
have help from the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Remove ALL obstruction from the GOP, including filibuster
and invoke the nuclear option now.

That way, a PROGRESSIVE legislation can be accomplished without the help of GOP or Conservatards.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. Yes, I think this is a good idea since Democrats will hold power forever.
I mean there is really no chance of the Republicans ever gaining control of the Senate again so why no invoke the nuclear option and dump the filibuster? I mean we never have to worry about the GOP again anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
33. And just how would you have felt if the filabuster had been eliminated in 2002?
Would you have been satisfied with the republican agenda, unchecked by a democrat minority in the Senate on the basis that it's what the majority wants?

What I'm waiting for is a President, any President, that puts some truth into claims that he wants legislation to be bipartisan - by vetoing any bill that doesn't have at least 10% of the opposition party's votes in Congress.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. It would be really nice if the Dems were all over the msm with this little tidbit.
They want to play politics with this? Go right ahead :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. DNC needs to run a bunch of ads in S.C. about this n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. SC, here we come.
DeMint is toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Versailles Donating Member (384 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. PLEASE!
The few of us Dems who live down here in psycho land would love to be able to get DeMint out...and if we can manage to get rid of the philanderer Sanford and the moron Graham I wouldn't complain! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hmm, side with DeMint or the TSA.....
That's 6 of one, half dozen of another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. With a new, competent administrator TSA could improve
DeMint, on the other hand....

Actually, even a halfway decent administrator would be a giant step forward for the TSA. Anything's got to be better than what we inherited from the previous administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Erroll Southers has abused his authority in every position he has ever held
He would be more of the same or even worse,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kweli4Real Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. How about a link, a story, an anecdote ...
anything other than a "he's a bad, bad man." Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. based on what? your word for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. i guess the obama excuse machine will rest with demint.... people could die but we got our scapegoat
sorry folks.... i'm pro OBAMA but failure to act is just that---- and a person to blame is only that

HEADLINES..... hundreds die but obama says not his fault because of GOP....

JACKASS BUSH WOULD NOT DO THAT.... as big an ass as he was, and as stoopid as he is, SHIT DIDNT STAND IN HIS WAY

---- but congress
---- but the blue dogs
---- but the gop
---- where's my mama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groundloop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. What "excuse machine" - I haven't heard any 'excuses' at all
I've heard President Obama say that we need to improve screening, and that coordination between different countries needs to get better.

As someone else said in a different thread, it's nice to have adults running things now.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AusDem Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. what on god's earth are you talking about?
this is why posting while intoxicated sounds good, but doesn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loudmxr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wanna see defeat in 2010? Just shut up about people like DeMint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Great campaign tool against DeMint, for sure, but really, not having a chief administrator
is no excuse for lax security. TSA is a bureaucracy with high-ranking career chiefs who should have the bureau running smoothly. That's their job.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. While the cat's away the mice will play. I guess we don't need Pilots either.
Because just like TSA the planes have an autopilot. The planes can literally fly themselves. But Autopilot is no way to run a commercial flight or the agency securing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. That is a GROSS exaggeration, Wizard777. If you have ever been in a bureaucracy you know that
it's the folks a rung or two down who keep the show running on an even keel while the "Top" administrators are going to Cabinet meetings and doing the stuff that figureheads do.

Every department in the federal government has turnover at the top--sometimes two or three times during an administration. Yet those departments continue to do what they are supposed to do despite the lack of a titular head.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Not really it's a good analogy. You have even explained how the auto pilot works.
So obviously you get it even if you have yet to realize that you do. That front line is the autopilot. They will keep going with or without a captain at the helm until they run out of resources and it all comes crashing down. Just like an airplanes autopilot. There are things that front line can't do just like a planes autopilot. They can't take off on or land ventures. But once you get a venture up and moving they will keep it going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Your analogy of one airplane on autopilot compared to a bureaucracy of thousands of
workers, supervisors, administrators, and one titular head is ludicrous. The head of the TSA is not the one who procures the funding and supplies the resources. The head of TSA is a figurehead bureaucrat who goes to meetings and signs papers. The work of getting funds, supplying resources, setting agendas, etc., etc. is done by other folks who are career professionals and are paid well to do their jobs. The "captain" of TSA is just another political patronage recipient who is being rewarded for supporting the party. If we're lucky, he/she is also someone who might be somewhat acquainted with the work of the organization and doesn't create problems by way of a hidden agenda or a personality that pisses the rest of the group off.

Take Kathleen Sebelius for example. Her qualifications include being a good Democratic politician and being a good Democratic politician. She has no background in Health or Human Services. She was a governor and she's been a good Democrat, and she's a woman who the party leaders know will not jeopardize her upward mobility by doing anything counter to the desires of the current administration. Do you think that the HHS Dept could run without her? Damn straight, Skippy. And it would do just fine. But she is there to make sure that the department does what the administration wants it to do. She can change its course--slowly usually--but basically she's a pencil pusher who is being rewarded for past service. The department already has its mission statement, its funding sources, its regulations, its administrators, etc. If Sebelius resigned tomorrow, President Obama could appoint another Secretary (pending Senate approval) and the departments wouldn't miss a beat.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Rachel is reporting on this during her show. Love that lady!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Does DeMint only fly on non-union airlines? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AusDem Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. THIS is what needs to be shouted by Democrats
on every media outlet available. The "pure" DuhMint is blocking effective management of the TSA due to political reasons, and endangering American lives.

Spread the word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
19. So TSA is somewhat of a Headless Horseman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
21. DeMint - Typical Republicon wanting America to FAIL
Why do Republicons want to keep America from being secure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SomeGuyInEagan Donating Member (872 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
23. DeMint = Douche bag (of the douche bagggiest variety)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murdoch Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
24. The Republicans don't care about protecting the USA
In fact, attacks on the USA help them. There are 300 million Americans, and a few dead every year will scare enough people to support the so-called Patriot Act at home and wars abroad.

This is a perfect example of that attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
26. Pure BS - Somebody is always running things. In the case of
TSA, it means that a qualified career Senior Executive Service answers to the Department Secretary. Hmmm, a career employee verses a political hack or campaign contributor? I'll take the SES career employee 10 out of 10 days. With the career employees you are far less likely to get "Heck of a Job Brownie" (Bush on FEMA) or "The System Worked" (Nepolatino on the Christmas Bombing attempt).

If we were REALLY serious about reform, there would be 90% fewer political appointees. Keep your political cronies for Secretary, Deputy Secretary and Under Secretaries but everyone in every department below Under Secretary (Assistant Sectaries and lower) would be career.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Excellent argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Thanks - and if it was so compelling, where is the President's
Appointment that would put a political in place through the end of this Congress? - plenty of time to overcome a senatorial hold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstinamotorcity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
32. Senator DeMint
is demented as f--k. Needs to get out of the Senate seat and onto the couch of a mental health professional.He might can get a discount if he takes a few friends along like Bachmann,Inhofe,J.Sessions,Foxx,Rove,Beck,Limbaugh,Dubya,Shooter,hell i take that back its enough of them where his visit should be free. Thats the republicon way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
34. Looking at this a few days later, it's not the TSA, currently being
by a career employee that was screwed-up. Rather it appears to be either the CIA, ODNI/NCTC or State Department that failed to act properly - and they all have political appointees in charge without a career in those fields.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC