Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. has first month in Iraq with no combat-related deaths

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 07:18 PM
Original message
U.S. has first month in Iraq with no combat-related deaths
Source: CNN

Baghdad, Iraq (CNN) -- December was the first month since the beginning of the Iraq war in which there were no U.S. combat deaths, the U.S. military reported.

There were three noncombat fatalities.

"That is a very significant milestone for us as we continue to move forward, and I think that also speaks to the level of violence and how it has decreased over time," said Army Gen. Ray Odierno, the top U.S. commander in Iraq.

Since the beginning of the war more than six years ago, 4,373 U.S. military members have died -- 3,477 from hostilities and 898 in non-combat incidents.

Combat fatalities have decreased significantly since June, when the United States started withdrawing troops from Baghdad, Iraq's capital, and other urban areas. The United States also started a troop drawdown in 2009 from about 160,000 to the current level of around 110,000.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/01/01/iraq.us.deaths/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. I suppose U.S. troops stayed on base and away from trouble
For the most part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Fewer targets there as well, lets hope for more of that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
34. Not so much staying on base as withdrawing from the major cities
and allowing the Iraqis to take the lead. It seems to have set in for the average Iraqi that our forces aren't going to be there forever and they're therefore not worth going out of their way to attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rabs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. With the dropping of charges against the Blackwater mercs yesterday


Fear plans are being hatched to target U.S. troops in revenge.

Hoping my fears are unfounded, for the troops' sake.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. No troops to shoot at = no troops shot.
I'm pretty sure this is not rocket science, if we leave, we'll stop being shot at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlancheSplanchnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. this was my thought too...
the President is drawing down, as he said he would....

funny thing, I heard about it while flipping through radio channels on my way to a Buddhist meeting. Stopped when I heard some news...it was being reported factually, not a slant show (no references to Obama administration policy, but they did say the first time since 2003)...then after the news portion, they returned to the rest of the program and it was.... a Christian station!!! I was surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
35. For the most part, they're still there, they've just relocated out of the cities.
Though your logic is sound, and as the withdrawal continues as will this trend of decreased anti-U.S. violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pasto76 Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. this makes me really happy.
In the countless discussions and arguments with folks over the past almost 7 years, Ive always said "winning" will be measured by my troops not having to wear body armour. Not leaving the perimieter on RED, not really needing bunkers for mortar or rocket attacks, and most importantly NOT DYING.

I dont care how they fucking spin it, the bad guys didnt get anyone this month.

SGT PASTO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yep, lets hope it continues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. 253 civilian casualties in Iraq for December 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Here is the key thing
Civilian deaths caused by Coalition and Iraqi state forces

Non-combatant Iraqi deaths resulting directly from actions involving US-led coalition forces were dramatically lower than in the preceding year, with a total of 63 reported by Dec 16 (2008: 594): deaths due to air attacks reduced from 365 in 2008 to 0 in 2009 (as of Dec 16). Deaths involving Iraqi forces were down from 521 in 2008 to 103 in 2009.

Of these deaths caused by US-coalition and Iraqi state forces, the number killed in joint actions fell from 114 in 2008 to 16 in 2009; the overall number of civilians killed by state forces (US-coalition, Iraqi, or both) was 1,001 in 2008 and 150 in 2009.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. We should chart it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
36. I assume the majority were killed by insurgents?
Anyone feel free to correct me if I'm mistaken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hoping for a lot more months like this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seeinfweggos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. No U.S. combat-related deaths in Iraq in December
Source: cnn

Baghdad, Iraq (CNN) -- December was the first month since the beginning of the Iraq war in which there were no U.S. combat deaths, the U.S. military reported.

There were three noncombat fatalities.

.....

Combat fatalities have decreased significantly since June, when the United States started withdrawing troops from Baghdad, Iraq's capital, and other urban areas. The United States also started a troop drawdown in 2009 from about 160,000 to the current level of around 110,000

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/01/01/iraq.us.deaths/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tburnsten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Excellent!
I haven't been keeping up with the news like I usually do, I am guessing that for the Iraqi people things are significantly more calm now as well?

Great news, let's hope this trend continues, and cut back on the accidents as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. We wouldn't have had any troops killed in Iraq in
2009 if none were there in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Troops killed in Afghanistan have
also gone down the last couple months but are way up for year:

http://icasualties.org/OEF/ByMonth.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Yes, and...back to Iraq: this is great news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Four of our service people did die in Iraq in December:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Again, no combat related deaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seeinfweggos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. non-combat fatalities
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Designated by the Pentagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seeinfweggos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. and therefore not true? you have some evidence to the contrary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Are you serious?
Edited on Sun Jan-03-10 01:15 AM by EFerrari
What part of they lie their asses off for a living is unclear to you

Robert Gates is a career BushCo fixer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seeinfweggos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. the government has lied before therefore they are lying about this.
that is the whole of your premise and conclusion? that's a fascinating approach to things. and by fascinating i mean knee-jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Four of our service people did die in Iraq in December:
No matter how you characterize me.

Four lives have been lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seeinfweggos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. four lives have been lost because they were in the military
not because they or that military were in iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seeinfweggos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. and btw, this news really doesn't sit well with you does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. It seems a little dishonest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seeinfweggos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. no, dishonest would be implying the military is engaged in some sort of cover-up
Edited on Sun Jan-03-10 03:57 PM by seeinfweggos
of the handful of non-combat deaths when you have nothing for evidence much less proof. fact of the matter is that obama said he would have us out of iraq in 16 months during the campaign. he has been president for 11.5 months and troop levels are down by a third and combat fatalities are down to nothing (at least for last month.) and as for the non-combat deaths, that number of service people probably would have gotten killed regardless of whether we were in iraq. the military can be a very dangerous job even in peace time, lot's of young folks with dangerous, heavy equipment. hell i bet it would be hard to find a population of over 100,000 humans were 3-5 people at least didn't get killed in a month.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Nope. Dishonest would be to ignore these deaths
via a slick headline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seeinfweggos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. uh, the reason you know about them is because the military released them when they
released the combat fatality number of zero. what exactly is dishonest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Right but that wasn't the headline, was it?
The spam is "no combat deaths in Iraq". A distinction without a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seeinfweggos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. you are smarter than that, i think. the headline was correct and appropriate
the fact that for the first time since 2003 ZERO american troops have been killed in action in iraq IS a bigger story than 3-5 people killed in accidents (as sad as that is)and you know that.

you are either being purposefully obtuse or obama's apparent success thus far in iraq, consistent with his campaign promises, is causing you cognitive dissonance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. No, I'm not being obtuse and not suffering Freon dissonance, thanks.
Edited on Sun Jan-03-10 06:45 PM by EFerrari
The headline is simply misleading but carry on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seeinfweggos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. you must explain the freon reference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rollin74 Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Good news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Don't sell that stock...
in the body-bag manufacturing company yet! The toll in Afghanistan is going up.... and it sounds like Yemen next. After that... who knows where.

The US death machine won't be stopped by a small drop in casualties in one location. There's a world to conquer out there, after all.

One fucking death is too many. Bring them home.... TODAY!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Defending our country isn't conquering.
The Yemen government is working with us to root out Al-Qaeda. How is that conquering them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Nicely said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Are you the Antichrist (post number 666)?
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Hahaha.
I didn't notice that, but you've been there before too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Ok I feel better now it went to 667, I've been listening
to Coast to Coast too much.:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #19
37. Ok... not conquering....
how about "extending our sphere of influence".. or "guarding our vital national interests"... or "spreading freedom"... or "someotherbullshit". We have been "working with" governments" all over the world to further our imperialist goals for over a century. I don't have to name names if you've read any history.

"I believe that if we had and would keep our dirty, bloody, dollar soaked fingers out of the business of these (Third World) nations so full of depressed, exploited people, they will arrive at a solution of their own. And if unfortunately their revolution must be of the violent type because the `haves' refuse to share with the `have-nots' by any peaceful method, at least what they get will be their own, and not the American style, which they don’t want and above all don’t want crammed down their throats by Americans." –
Gen. David Shoup, United States Marine Commandant (during the first part of my time in the Corps) Medal of Honor recipient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
38. good news for the troops and hopefully, it means the Iraqis don't feel like they are getting screwed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
39. seems like money has been distributed properly this time n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainMickey Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
41. Good. Get the hell out now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC