An article published in the December 12th edition of the New York Times
revealed the detention of a US government contract employee in Havana
this past December 5th. The employee, whose name has not yet been
disclosed, works for Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI), one of the
largest US government contractors providing services to the State
Department, the Pentagon and the US Agency for International
Development (USAID). The employee was detained while distributing
cellular telephones, computers and other communications equipment to
Cuban dissident and counterrevolutionary groups that work to promote US
agenda on the Caribbean island.
Last year, the US Congress
approved $40 million to “promote transition to democracy” in Cuba. DAI
was awarded the main contract, “The Cuba Democracy and Contingency
Planning Program”, with oversight by State and USAID. The use of a
chain of entities and agencies is a mechanism employed by the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) to channel and filter funding and strategic
political support to groups and individuals that support US agenda
abroad. The pretext of “promoting democracy” is a modern form of CIA
subversion tactics, seeking to infiltrate and penetrate civil society
groups and provide funding to encourage “regime change” in
strategically important nations, such as Venezuela, with governments
unwilling to subcomb to US dominance.
DAI IN VENEZUELA
DAI
was contracted in June 2002 by USAID to manage a multimillion dollar
contract in Venezuela, just two months after the failed coup d’etat
against President Hugo Chávez. Prior to this date, USAID had no
operations in Venezuela, not even an office in the Embassy. DAI was
charged with opening the Office for Transition Initiatives (OTI), a
specialized branch of USAID that manages large quantities of liquid
funds destined for organizations and political parties favorable to
Washington in countries of strategic interest that are undergoing
political crises.
The first contract between USAID and DAI for
its Venezuela operations authorized $10 million for a two year period.
DAI opened its doors in the Wall Street of Caracas, El Rosal, in August
2002, and began to immediately fund the same groups that just months
earlier had executed - unsuccessfully – the coup against President
Chávez. The USAID/DAI funds in Venezuela were distributed to
organizations such as Fedecámaras and the Confederación de Trabajadores
Venezolanos (CTV), two of the principal entities that had led the coup
in April 2002 and that later headed another attempt to oust Chávez by
imposing an economic sabotage and oil industry strike that crippled the
nation’s economy. One contract between DAI and these organizations,
dated December 2002, awarded more than $10,000 to help design radio and
television propaganda against President Chávez. During that time
period, Venezuela experienced one of the most viscious media wars in
history. Private television and radio stations, together with print
media, devoted non-stop programming to opposition propaganda for 64
days, 24 hours a day.
In February 2003, DAI began to fund a
recently created group named Súmate, led by Maria Corina Machado, one
of the signators of the “Carmona Decree”, the famous dictatorial decree
that dissolved all of Venezuela’s democratic institutions during the
brief April 2002 coup d’etat. Súmate soon became the principal
opposition organization directing campaigns against President Chávez,
including the August 2004 recall referendum. The three main agencies
from Washington operating in Venezuela at that time, USAID, DAI and the
National Endowment for Democracy (“NED”), invested more than $9 million
in the opposition campaign to oust Chávez via recall referendum,
without success. Chávez won with a 60-40 landslide victory.
More:
http://www.mediaisland.org/en/employee-cia-front-organization-working-venezuela-was-detained-cuba-week~~~~~~~More on Sneaky US Contractor in Cuba: How Did He Get Equipment into the Country?
2009 December 15
tags: Cuba, USAID, electronic equipment, DAI, Development Alternatives Inc
by magbana
Below is a detailed statement by the President of Development Alternatives, Inc. regarding the company’s mission in Cuba on behalf of the USAID.. Following that is an excellent comment pointing to some very necessary questions that should be asked about this whole affair.
As for, where did the equipment come from? One should safely assume that if not from the US Interests Section, it came from one of the embassies of the US’ lackeys — maybe Canada.
CUBAN TRIANGLE
MONDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2009
USAID contractor’s statement on American detained in Cuba
http://cubantriangle.blogspot.com/2009/12/usaid-contractors-statement-on-american.html This statement was cited in news reports over the weekend:
Statement from Dr. Jim Boomgard, President and CEO of Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI)The New York Times and other media outlets have reported the detention of a U.S. citizen in Cuba linked to DAI.DAI is a professional economic development organization that has for 40 years been working to bring development benefits to millions of disadvantaged people in more than 100 countries worldwide ( www.dai.com ).Our prime concern is for the safety, well-being, and quick return to the United States of the detained individual. We have been working closely with the State Department to ensure that the detainee’s safety and well-being is given top priority. Given the delicacy of this situation, we ask for media discretion. All inquires should be directed to the State Department.In 2008, DAI competed for and was awarded a contract, the Cuba Democracy and Contingency Planning Program, to help the U.S. Government implement activities in support of the rule of law and human rights, political competition, and consensus building, and to strengthen civil society in support of just and democratic governance in Cuba(www.usaid.gov/locations/latin_america_caribbean/country/cuba/).
The new program was also designed to help the U.S. Government address challenges raised about some aspects of its program in the past (November 2006 GAO report on US Democracy Assistance for Cuba — www.gao.gov/new.items/d07147.pdf ). DAI was engaged on the basis of its positive track record in development, and its capacity to provide sound management and administration of key aspects of U.S. Government programs such as this one, which involves support for the peaceful activities of a broad range of nonviolent organizations through competitively awarded grants and subcontracts.
The detained individual was an employee of a program subcontractor, which was implementing a competitively issued subcontract to assist Cuban civil society organizations.
{December 12, 2009}
COMMENT ON USAID CONTRACTOR DETAINED IN CUBA
Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:07 pm (PST)
(Terrific comment by blogger “leftside” on the US agent
caught by the Cubans in the act of distributing material
aid to subversive elements in Cuba. Just imagine how this
guy got the laptops and cell phones he was distributing in
Cuba? He certainly did not bring them in and go through
Cuban customs with them. Where did he get them? And how
were they provided to him on the ground inside of Cuba?
There must be a thousand other questions one might think
to ask about this escapade. It boggles the imagination.)
More:
http://hondurasoye.wordpress.com/2009/12/15/more-on-sneaky-us-contractor-in-cuba-how-did-he-get-equipment-into-the-country/