National disaster exercises, called too costly and scripted, may be scaled back

[alp227]

Source: The Washington Post

The plan was to stage the nation's first live exercise that simulates a nuclear bomb being detonated by terrorists in an American city, with 10,000 emergency responders, U.S. troops and officials playing out their roles in the heart of Las Vegas.

But the Obama administration canceled the Nevada events set for next month after Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), backed by casino and business interests, said it would frighten away tourists and "unacceptably harm" the region's battered economy.

The federal government is also considering whether to scale back next year's National Level Exercise, the annual drill that for the past decade has been a cornerstone of the nation's efforts to prepare for a catastrophic terrorist attack or natural disaster. The 2011 exercise was envisioned by states as a five-day test in the Midwest for a 7.7-magnitude earthquake, but the Federal Emergency Management Agency might instead limit the event to three days and test for a milder earthquake, state and federal officials said.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/01/AR2010040103746_pf.html

[Posteritatis]

1. I can just imagine the howls of rage and tinhattery from the right if this went through. (nt)

[No Elephants]

2. I wonder whose brainchild this plan was and why Las Vegas was chosen.

[boppers]

3. On 9/11, they asked if it was an exercise.

This is how bored the scripts have become.

It's like watching "Lost". No resolution, just endless re-runs of plot games.

[Robb]

4. Local governments "table top" this kind of stuff all the time.

Turns out it's much more useful on a local scale, because of limited resources.

[bemildred]

5. Dang, we can't even afford these propaganda exercises anymore?

What has the country come to? We can only afford three days and a milder earthquake?