Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Actor Paul Reubens (PeeWee) Pleads Guilty in Obscenity Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 02:38 PM
Original message
Actor Paul Reubens (PeeWee) Pleads Guilty in Obscenity Case
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Actor Paul Reubens (news), who won fame as children's television star "Pee-wee Herman," pleaded guilty on Friday to a misdemeanor charge of possessing obscene material and was sentenced to three years of informal probation that requires him to stay away from children.

Prosecutors, as part of an agreement with Reubens, agreed to drop second charge of possessing child pornography and allow the actor, who maintains that the pictures at the center of the case are part of his art collection, to continue an appeal of the case.

end of story
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=638&e=2&u=/nm/20040319/en_nm/crime_reubens_dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. This guy is dumber than the one sitting in the White House.
Art collection my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. He collects old "physique" magazines.
Some of them, which were published in the 50s and 60s, have models in them who are now, under current law, underage. Quite a few people collect these magazines--check out Ebay and you will see a lot of them on sale at any given time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. So it wasn't child porn?
Prosecutors call it obscene, Reubens calls it art?

What was it, Jock Sturges photos?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LividLiberal Donating Member (181 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. naked children, sounds like
hardly sounds like "art"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well there are famous Renaissance paintings with naked cherubs
which look like children...but I doubt that is what he had in his collection...

You would think he would have learned after his first run in with the cops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Have you ever heard of Sally Mann?
Just because you might think of a naked child as sexual doesn't mean everyone else does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Hardly sounds criminal.
You can go down to the corner Barnes and Noble, go to the arts section, and get a book with photographs of naked children.

Sounds like a witchhunt to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Again?
You'd think he'd learn to be more careful, if nothing else.

Dumb as dirt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zookeeper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. With all of the rapists, child molesters, serial killers...
out there, I really can't understand why so much time is spent checking up on Pee-Wee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Because he's a famous eccentric.
Edited on Fri Mar-19-04 03:05 PM by mac56
Specifically, famous for being somewhat eccentric.

Which is all the more reason to be super-damn careful.

(edited to make more specific)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. the last quality children's program stomped into the mud.
coincidence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. He's got no one to blame but himself for that
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. no kiddin
used to be you could just go blind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Lewis Carroll took photographs of naked little girls
Who knows? Maybe today he'd be in prison and "Alice Through the Looking-Glass" would be banned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Thats RIGHT! I saw them too!
Edited on Fri Mar-19-04 05:46 PM by tinanator
They were on exhibit last September at the Museum of Modern Photography(?) in NYC, and a very impressive display. What an excellent point, but probably pearls before the lynch mob. What our culture may be reduced to in the near future is terrifying to consider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. What did JFK have in common with the man sitting in the row...
...in front of Pee Wee Herman in the theater?
A: They both got shot in the back of the head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TolstoyAndy Donating Member (493 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. But ...
didn't JFK get shot in the front of the head?

(that's a good chuckle anyway - thanks!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC