Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Stevens to leave while Obama in office

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 11:49 PM
Original message
Justice Stevens to leave while Obama in office
Source: Associated Press


Justice Stevens to leave while Obama in office

21 mins ago

WASHINGTON – Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens says he "will surely" retire while President Barack Obama is still in office, giving the president the opportunity to maintain the high court's ideological balance.

Stevens said in newspaper interviews on the Web Saturday that he will decide soon on the timing of his retirement, whether it will be this year or next. Stevens, the leader of the court's liberals, turns 90 this month and is the oldest justice.

His departure would give Obama his second nomination to the court, enabling him to ensure there would continue to be at least four liberal-leaning justices. The high court is often split 5 to 4 on major cases, with the vote of moderate Justice Anthony Kennedy often deciding which side prevails.

"I will surely do it while he's still president," Stevens told The Washington Post.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_supreme_court_stevens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kennedy a moderate? Please. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
704wipes Donating Member (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. oh good, now we can get a Socialist on the Supremes...
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He'll probably appoint somebody from Goldman Sachs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. fuck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyy1998 Donating Member (984 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Sotomayor worked for GS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. If (and a big if at that) he were to appoint a good replacement
he need to get the chance before the next Congress. Someone as good as Stevens will have a hard time getting approved.

And we don't need some token middle of the road judge. The republicans gave us thomas, scalia, and roberts. We need to put a 35 year old firebrand on the court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. The repugs will forget how the Dems rolled over for Bush nominees
and scream to high heaven and block and delay and have their usual hissy fit. It is clear as day that doing something to appease the GOP into some kind of cooperation is a fool's errand. Reciprocity is unheard of in the GOP.... unless corporate funds are involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. The best thing to do with GOP Senators
who try their usual bullshit is to charge them with a trumped up crime and make them defend it. Accuse them of taking bribes that are funneled into secret off shore accounts. Accuse them of working hand in hand with the Bush cartel to subvert the Constitution. Accuse them of willfully promoting a war of aggression for profit.
Make them deny it. Accuse them of having sex with young boys; that should get McConnell to resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. so how long can the court make it with only 8 justices?
I don't see a single republic voting to confirm an Obama Nominee. Not even if he were to nominate ol Darth Cheney himself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. This would be a hard decision on timing
If he chose to retire at the end of this current session, the ugliness that the rethugs will generate over the summer leading up to the election (with loud bleating about "activist justices", while ignoring their own activist idiots), will be the perfect distraction that causes Dems to go on the defensive - and moreso because of the pounding that would occur from the prevaricating gasbag RW-owned M$M. But if he waits until after, the Dems seem to suggest their own self-inflicted demoralization due to a fear of a potential loss of seats in the Senate this fall, presumably making it more difficult to install a new justice.

IMHO, the fact that Democrats had even managed to get to 60 (even after the 200+ day delay in seating Franken), was never really on the original radar as it was once a pipe dream. The hope had originally been to try to get close - like to 57 or 58.

We shall see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. While he's president isn't good enough.
It needs to be while we have a solid majority in the Senate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groundloop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. True, but even the "solid" majority now is awful shaky
Lie-berman's a republican, other's aren't much more reliable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lobodons Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
13. Solid majority is gone
Edited on Sun Apr-04-10 09:15 AM by lobodons
Dems will have a very slim majority after November and then in the next couple cycles will have to defend the pickups they got in 06 and 08 so holding majority will be tough. This might be Obama's last chance to get a real progressive in the SCOTUS. But will that turn moderates off for November if the opening is this year? November is looking like it could be a bloodbath anyway. (hopefully not literally, but will not be surprised if it is) It might. But hopefully it will bring the progressives out which might sit out otherwise since Obama really has been a very centrist administrator so far. (I would love to see Klochabar nominated, but not until MN gets a D Gov.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
14. While I honor Stevens' many years of service to the country... what the heck is he waiting for?
Edited on Sun Apr-04-10 10:19 AM by Bucky
Must've been a really interesting case he was waiting to hear from the bench back when Democrats had 60 votes in the Senate. Thanks a billion, JP.

Request to the president: please make this next one under 50.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
15. Republicans will scream "But your nominee is not conservative activist enough"!
Fucking cheaters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC