|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
cal04
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 04:30 PM Original message |
AP sources: Dawn Johnsen withdraws as nominee to head Justice Dept. Office of Legal Counsel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. Shit! They're driving out all the good ones. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pscot
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 04:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. The Prez should have made a recess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 05:03 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Why didn't he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 07:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
30. Cuz he never wanted her in the first place? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 07:55 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Maybe if there is another Fox interview we'll find out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:00 AM Response to Reply #34 |
52. Consider the view of a Democratic legal scholar, whom I quoted in Reply #51. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. k/r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alstephenson
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
3. Crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
4. How dare she criticize how the bushes tortured POWs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
5. Even with majorities in the House and Senate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 05:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. I think it speaks more to the lockstep opposition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 05:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I think it speaks to impotence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 05:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. 59 macho ballcrushers couldn't overcome a 41-vote filibuster by pink tutu'd sissies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Help me then, why not recess appointed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:08 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Because she withdrew. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:17 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. The administration's already had several opportunities for a recess appointment! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:20 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I agree with depakid, Qu |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:37 AM Response to Reply #19 |
61. I agree with Mithreal's agreeent with DepaKid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 02:06 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:31 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Why would they nominate her if they weren't interested in her services? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:44 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Ever thought about hiring someone and changed your mind? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:53 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Her record and positions have been public for a long time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 07:04 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. "It's important to note that she withdrew" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 07:26 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. In other words, you've determined that Obama asked her to withdraw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 07:42 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Anyone who knows anything about Washington politics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 07:48 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Who can say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:36 AM Response to Reply #25 |
60. What DepaKid said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:34 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Agree. Recess appointment should have been made. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 09:02 AM Response to Reply #15 |
45. No, she withdrew when AFTER she was not among the recess appointments that Obama did make. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinblue
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 08:29 PM Response to Reply #13 |
36. the White House chose not to appoint Johnsen during Senate recess,............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 10:55 AM Response to Reply #10 |
50. According to Greenwald, they had the votes to confirm Johnsen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:03 AM Response to Reply #10 |
53. In 1 sentence, you've managed to insult women, gays AND ballerinas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
24. They will do this REGARDLESS of who the nominee is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 07:18 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 01:30 AM Response to Reply #24 |
39. The nominee was excellent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:23 AM Response to Reply #24 |
57. Please see Reply #51, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 09:00 AM Response to Reply #7 |
44. So? Make them fillibuster. REALLY fillibuster. See how long those farts last. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 08:59 AM Response to Reply #5 |
43. Please consider Reply # 30. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 01:24 AM Response to Reply #5 |
65. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
24601
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 10:25 PM Response to Reply #5 |
68. The House has nothing to do with it. The only tine they confirm any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eShirl
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
11. good - now he can nominate her to the Supreme Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:28 AM Response to Reply #11 |
59. Hope probably won't hurt anything in this instance.. Disappointment, however, can be a bear! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
12. Perhaps she withdrew to be available for appointment to the Supreme Court. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peoli
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
14. He was so good in Miami Vice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vattel
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
16. well, at least Obama is trying to get good people in DOJ. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
17. Probably a wise move |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:21 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 07:21 PM Response to Reply #17 |
29. Deleted message |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 10:24 AM Response to Reply #17 |
48. As Solicitor General, Kagan supervises litigation involving the federal government. Just sayin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
26. Deleted message |
robinblue
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
35. The votes were not there. Perhaps the WH asked her to withdraw??... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 08:50 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Recess appointment avoids that entirely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinblue
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 05:53 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. for a while onlyl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 09:55 AM Response to Reply #40 |
46. A lot of folks are only there for a while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:26 AM Response to Reply #40 |
58. SO? That is true of all recess appointment, yet Presidents, incl. Obama, make them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinblue
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 01:15 AM Response to Reply #58 |
64. that is true. but it is up to the Pres to proceed. seems he chose not to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 01:08 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Recess appointment "would have kept her in the position for less than two years." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 09:55 AM Response to Reply #38 |
47. Once in. Why look for weakness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 10:27 AM Response to Reply #35 |
49. Per Greenwald, the votes WERE there. Of course, so was ability to make a recess appointment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seafan
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
41. The handwriting was on the wall for this nominee since Day 1. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
42. Once again Dems cower and run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:09 AM Response to Reply #42 |
54. Please see Reply #51. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:09 AM Response to Reply #42 |
55. Self Delete Dupe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
51. ...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
56. The Death of Dawn Johnsen's Nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 06:13 PM Response to Reply #56 |
63. an excellent fit for Candidate Obama, but an awful fit for President Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
66. note to O admin: stop caving in to the repukes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
67. A big hope: Johnsen is writing the mother of all terrorist interrogation takedowns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC