|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
alp227
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 05:29 PM Original message |
Gilroy police: Canadian military man rode 3,000 miles to have sex with teen girl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. Seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
D-Lee
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 05:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Lucky for teenage girls living where there are statutory rape laws ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 05:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. imo, 17 is ridiculously old for stat rape laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
24601
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 10:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
39. "Bitch set me up" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 11:05 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. lol nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JBoy
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 09:18 AM Response to Reply #4 |
74. Canada's was recently raised to 16. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 12:24 PM Response to Reply #74 |
96. thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BR_Parkway
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 12:06 PM Response to Reply #4 |
95. That's nuts - you could legally have sex with a 17yo, but go to jail for asking her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 12:27 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. not in california |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 01:47 PM Response to Reply #95 |
111. The Older I Get, The More I Think That Any Man Who'd Ride 3k Miles To Get In My Pants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 05:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I'm saying that it weakens the meaning of pedophilia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bamacrat
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 06:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. I agree 17 year olds may make poor decision but know what they are doing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 09:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. A line has to be drawn somewhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 09:27 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. A 17 yr old is not a child. This sounds more like Dad or Mom freaking out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 09:29 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. By law she is a MINOR. Parents be damned. This asshole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 09:30 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. This asshole? You know him personally? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 09:34 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Anybody who would drive 3,000 miles to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 09:40 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Anyone who would drive 3000 miles to see a girl sounds like a kid to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 09:47 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. "See" a girl? Way to downplays this guy's sick intentions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 09:49 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Sex between young people is sick? Okay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 09:54 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. No. Sex between an adult and a minor is. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 11:36 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. I see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 05:00 AM Response to Reply #36 |
56. You have a dirty mind.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 09:42 PM Response to Reply #56 |
130. If finding sex between an adult and a minor to be sick makes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 10:02 PM Response to Reply #130 |
136. Yea, if you characterize a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 10:12 PM Response to Reply #136 |
140. I'm shocked it took this long for somebody to makes the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 10:27 PM Response to Reply #140 |
142. If the shoe fits... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 10:30 PM Response to Reply #142 |
143. That's what I thought... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 10:47 PM Response to Reply #140 |
146. There is zero evidence that this young women was abused in any way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Threedifferentones
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 09:09 AM Response to Reply #36 |
73. Letting laws decide your ethics is ridiculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 09:46 PM Response to Reply #73 |
131. It is 2010. Why are you talking about Homer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:15 PM Response to Reply #131 |
149. "It is 2010. Why are you talking about Homer?" You could make up a lot of those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lagomorph
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 10:02 PM Response to Reply #36 |
137. My, my....how we've changed.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 01:44 PM Response to Reply #36 |
163. 24 and 17? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 04:45 AM Response to Reply #33 |
55. I am amused and sickened at the same time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 09:51 PM Response to Reply #55 |
132. I'm not talking about anywhere else in the civilized world. I live in the U.S.A. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 10:23 PM Response to Reply #132 |
141. "Child abuser"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 10:31 PM Response to Reply #141 |
144. I'm happy you are not a legislator. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 06:34 PM Response to Reply #33 |
117. You have a strange definition of a "child abuser" or "sick intentions" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 09:54 PM Response to Reply #117 |
133. I don't approve of sex between an adult and a minor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:12 PM Response to Reply #133 |
148. So if the age of consent in California was brought in line with 78% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 06:31 PM Response to Reply #32 |
116. Right on brother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 07:17 AM Response to Reply #30 |
70. Unless that person is ALSO a minor. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:00 AM Response to Reply #26 |
80. So, it started when he was 20 and she was 13? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 01:23 PM Response to Reply #80 |
105. You really should read the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojorabbit
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 03:59 AM Response to Reply #21 |
53. I was taking college classes at 17 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 10:14 AM Response to Reply #53 |
77. I was doing half day at high school, and a half day at college |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:03 AM Response to Reply #53 |
82. 13 and 20 sounds a lot worse, doesn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:11 AM Response to Reply #53 |
85. How about when you were 13? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bamacrat
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 08:55 AM Response to Reply #21 |
72. You are right but 17 is too old. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 09:57 PM Response to Reply #72 |
134. Send your recommendations to your congressman or congresswoman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bamacrat
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 12:19 AM Response to Reply #134 |
152. Eh, I'd rather get pot legalized. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Threedifferentones
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:37 PM Response to Reply #134 |
165. Stop pretending law and ethics are the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 10:59 AM Response to Reply #12 |
79. According to Reply 74, it's now 16, not 14. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. So pedophilia is OK if a kid is older than 11, "almost" an adult? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 05:59 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Wait, what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eagertolearn
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 06:31 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Gilroy is known for its garlic festival. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 10:25 PM Response to Reply #11 |
38. I must admit, this is one post I did not expect to see in this thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 06:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. But if an 18 year-old has sex with a 17 year-old, is he a pedophile? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 08:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. It sounds like something a kid would do, doesn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foxfeet
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 07:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Pedophilia is the attraction to pre-pubescent children. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:02 AM Response to Reply #13 |
81. Apparently, he was first attracted to her when she was 13 and he was 20. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foxfeet
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 06:18 PM Response to Reply #81 |
114. Still not pedophilia. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 08:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
16. He's only 24. HIs brain isn't even finished developing yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:09 AM Response to Reply #16 |
84. Neither has her mind developed fully, which is the whole point of statutory rape laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 10:51 PM Response to Reply #84 |
147. You are embroidering. How do you know "he's been waiting" ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 11:08 AM Response to Reply #16 |
169. My Grandfather Married at 22 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 09:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
135. Finally. A voice of reason in this twisted thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 10:42 PM Response to Reply #135 |
145. Both of you need to look up the word to see what it means. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 06:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. The contact started when she was 13, and he was 20. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 01:24 AM Response to Reply #9 |
51. but there was no sexual contact then? So whats the point of your post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 05:04 AM Response to Reply #51 |
57. If you don't think it's creepy for a 20 to be grooming a 13, I don't know what to say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 05:15 AM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Never been on Facebook huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 05:21 AM Response to Reply #59 |
60. My god-daughters are on facebook. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 05:31 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. Ok grandma/pa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 05:57 AM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Congrats on your ignorance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 06:19 AM Response to Reply #65 |
66. Kids have always been stupid..er..done stupid things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:14 AM Response to Reply #62 |
86. How about the online culture of 13 year olds and 20 year olds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 01:11 PM Response to Reply #86 |
100. Notice there was no real contact or relationship at that point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 01:15 PM Response to Reply #100 |
102. Is it just me or are people much more uptight than they were twenty years ago? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 01:19 PM Response to Reply #102 |
103. I think they are more uptight than they have been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 01:13 PM Response to Reply #86 |
101. And maybe he wasn't at the time. You know that 13 year old girls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 06:46 PM Response to Reply #62 |
119. My little sister couldn't stop laughing at me when she found out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 06:43 PM Response to Reply #60 |
118. I didn't realize you were supervising and recording all of their contact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:05 AM Response to Reply #59 |
83. No physical contact, or so they say. "The heart wants what it wants" Woody Allen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 01:28 PM Response to Reply #83 |
106. You said "physical", not me, the article if you chose to read it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 01:34 PM Response to Reply #106 |
108. Isn't that the plot to "Daddy Longlegs"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
icee
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 08:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. I agree with you here. Besides, a relationship that lasts that long |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:17 AM Response to Reply #14 |
87. Damn that 13 year old, egging on a 20 year old for four years, until he could not help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 01:33 PM Response to Reply #87 |
107. There is NOTHING suggesting that they have been doing this for four years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
icee
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 03:15 PM Response to Reply #87 |
113. I think you're going overboard in foul interpretation of that which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 06:54 PM Response to Reply #14 |
120. Where does it say they were in a relationship for the last four years? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
icee
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:34 PM Response to Reply #120 |
150. That "is" a relationship. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:39 PM Response to Reply #150 |
151. I am not in a relationship with 257 people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
icee
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 08:20 AM Response to Reply #151 |
158. Relationship is also "the way one feels about another", not simply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #158 |
160. You're assuming quite a bit about me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 06:08 PM Response to Reply #158 |
166. You didn't explain how you see me being in a relationship with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:14 AM Response to Reply #150 |
154. They lost contact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
icee
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 08:08 AM Response to Reply #154 |
157. My initial post said simply "relationship". Subsequent posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 01:24 PM Response to Reply #154 |
161. It's nice to know someone else on this board can read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 08:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
15. When I was 17, my boyfriend was 24. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 09:14 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. When I was 17 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 09:26 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. When I was 17, there were a lot of guys coming back from Viet Nam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
24601
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 10:38 PM Response to Reply #15 |
40. What's his name, address & local police department? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 11:38 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. DU authoritarians untie! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 06:57 PM Response to Reply #46 |
121. "untie", that's brilliant! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 08:49 PM Response to Reply #121 |
128. It's a revision of an old joke, "Dyslexics untie!" for "unite". n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #15 |
88. When you were 13, was your boyfriend 20? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 12:57 PM Response to Reply #88 |
98. Somewhere he was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 06:59 PM Response to Reply #98 |
122. owned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillParkinson
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
7. Photo of Mr. DeBruyn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 09:42 AM Response to Reply #7 |
76. He looks like a Senators fan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
10. Deleted message |
droidamus2
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
18. So? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 08:56 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Well said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 09:28 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Comparing murder and sex with minors is kind of a stretch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 09:29 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Less of a stretch than calling a 17 year old a child. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 09:33 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. 17 is a minor. Under 18 is a minor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 09:38 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. So, what does that mean to you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 09:53 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. I've said it several times. It means a line has been clearly drawn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 11:36 PM Response to Reply #35 |
44. Okay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The2ndWheel
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 05:22 AM Response to Reply #35 |
61. Yet the laws which were written were picked and chosen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 01:23 AM Response to Reply #29 |
50. well, no. In some states, age of consent is 16. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 04:37 AM Response to Reply #29 |
54. However, it would have been legal for them to marry with the parents' consent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:26 AM Response to Reply #54 |
91. The line is clear. No sex with a 17 year old unless married to him or her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #91 |
104. I'd believe him if he said he didn't know it was illegal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 01:35 PM Response to Reply #104 |
109. Gilroy is not a bastion of liberalism. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 10:03 PM Response to Reply #91 |
138. Thank you no elephants. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
droidamus2
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 12:53 AM Response to Reply #24 |
49. Wrong comparison |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:42 AM Response to Reply #49 |
92. Are you assuming something is wrong with setting different minimum ages for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 07:16 PM Response to Reply #92 |
123. You still haven't read the article have you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
droidamus2
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 08:26 PM Response to Reply #92 |
127. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 05:41 AM Response to Reply #24 |
63. "Comparing murder and sex with minors is kind of a stretch" WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 07:19 PM Response to Reply #63 |
124. Sure thing bub, consentual sex between a young adult and a 17 year old |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 10:07 PM Response to Reply #63 |
139. What are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:19 AM Response to Reply #139 |
153. Some stats: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 01:33 PM Response to Reply #153 |
162. If you don't see a major difference between a nine year old and a 17 year old |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 11:27 PM Response to Reply #162 |
168. Reading is fun! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:49 PM Response to Reply #168 |
171. I went by the median figure YOU posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 09:28 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. No kidding. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:20 AM Response to Reply #18 |
89. Um, what about a 24 year old who breaks the law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 07:20 PM Response to Reply #89 |
125. You didn't bother to read the article did you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 01:45 PM Response to Reply #18 |
110. In most US states, this would have been perfectly legal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onager
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
37. Canadian Armed Forces? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 11:31 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. And maple syrup grenades. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
time_has_come
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 12:14 AM Response to Reply #37 |
47. I guess Canada should spend as much as the US, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 02:55 AM Response to Reply #47 |
52. Which is why the Canadians could never have defeated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogtown
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 06:58 AM Response to Reply #52 |
67. Oh, you'll do well here, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 07:22 PM Response to Reply #67 |
126. Don't like him picking on your darling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogtown
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:53 AM Response to Reply #126 |
156. What are you going on about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darth_Kitten
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 10:05 AM Response to Reply #52 |
159. Yeah, Canadians were NEVER there for any battle, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 11:23 PM Response to Reply #159 |
167. I never said that Canadians never helped...I was replying to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darth_Kitten
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 05:04 PM Response to Reply #167 |
170. I'm just being saucy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:51 AM Response to Reply #47 |
94. A simple $ and population comparison is as simplistic as what you CLAIM an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:21 AM Response to Reply #37 |
90. The only issue here is the age of the beaver. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
41. Damn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnie624
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 12:40 AM Response to Reply #41 |
48. If you were a 24 year old male, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 08:04 AM Response to Reply #48 |
71. Yeah I guess I've forgotten |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 05:08 AM Response to Original message |
58. The paper should be ashamed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 05:44 AM Response to Original message |
64. A true story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 07:13 AM Response to Original message |
68. I think the age of consent should be whatever age you need to be to have a driver's license. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 11:47 AM Response to Reply #68 |
93. That's really up to the state legislators and the people who elect them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 07:16 AM Response to Original message |
69. What a fucking moron... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
75. Please have a seat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
78. As he's neither a priest nor a teacher... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 01:07 PM Response to Reply #78 |
99. The headline may be bullshit for all we know. Yeah, it sounds overblown to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BR_Parkway
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
112. Strange responses in this thread - apparently it's akin to pedophilia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
115. A simple fact: sometimes the law is wrong. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 09:39 PM Response to Reply #115 |
129. We are so hung up on this 'sex' thing in this country... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:30 AM Response to Reply #129 |
155. I'd suggest 16. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 01:48 PM Response to Reply #155 |
164. that makes sense. we are all for the right to have an abortion at any age (mostly) but a 24 yr old |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC