Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WaMu execs saw warning signs of deteriorating loans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:22 PM
Original message
WaMu execs saw warning signs of deteriorating loans
Source: Seattle Times

Washington Mutual and its lenders were making so much money on subprime mortgages and other risky loans that they couldn't stop — even when senior managers and regulators told them to.

<snip>

A November 2005 review of loans in southern California found "an extensive level of loan fraud...virtually all of it stemming from employees in these areas circumventing bank policy surrounding loan verification and review."

At one California office, 58 percent of loans examined in an internal review were fraudulent; at another, 83 percent.

Tuesday's hearing will go over much of what has become familiar ground to WaMu watchers: the thrift's headlong plunge into the murky world of subprime loans, pay-option adjustable-rate mortgages, no-documentation loans and other "innovations" that eventually killed WaMu and nearly sank the rest of the financial system.

The company, subcommittee chairman Carl Levin said, seemed to be focused on feeding investment banks' insatiable appetite for high-risk loans that could be bundled, sliced up, sprinkled with financial fairy dust and sold as investment-grade securities.

Read more: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2011590020_wamu13.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just let the market take care of it
Yeah, right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. 2006 - As Homeowners Face Strains, Market Bets On Loan Defaults
"The ease with which folks such as Mr. Spirou were borrowing against their homes (from WAMU) sent warning signals to some investors. The concern: that in their rush to attract customers amid the housing boom, mortgage lenders were lowering their standards. In 2005, for example, the share of interest-only loans grew to about 18% of all subprime loans, from next to nothing in 2001, according to data provider First American Loan Performance. Over the same period, the share of subprime loans that required little or no documentation of the borrower's income grew to more than 16% from about 10%.

"We looked at this and thought we're going to see lenders who are misusing these tools," says Mr. Whalen. "We're going to see the performance of their bonds deteriorate."

At about the same time, in early 2005, Wall Street bankers were developing a new kind of derivative contract that would allow investors such as Mr. Whalen to make bets based on their misgivings. Called a credit-default swap, it had previously been applied mainly to corporate and sovereign bonds. Like an insurance contract, it pays off if a subprime-backed bond suffers a certain amount of losses to defaults. The holder, known as a protection buyer, makes regular payments to a bank or other counterparty for the insurance, and also has the right to resell the contract. If defaults prove higher than expected and the bond starts to look riskier, the value of the contract rises, and the holder can resell it at a profit."

http://www.realestatejournal.com/buysell/mortgages/20061031-whitehouse.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katanalori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's blame the "employees"
I see a theme here. WHERE was management? NO quality control?

I am not buying it. Bank execs want to pretend it is all the "lowly" employee's fault for not providing analysis of documentation. WaMu - Nobody "higher up" checked the verifications (employment, credit scores, etc.)?

Humph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. those employees were probably not that lowly either to be honest. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mopar151 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Forseen by prophets
"They're goin' to ruin us all, by and by
I'm tellin you all beware
I think they don't really care
And they just sit up there
And just get high"

Nice acoustic version - Van Zant brothers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-2SqsB_Vuc

Live, in the day

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGVbWy-pYDc&feature=related

It did'nt matter how bad the loans stunk. They could be written up on dead fish and there's brokerages clamoring for them - 'cuz they can sell 'em, and bet against them (with credit default swaps) at the same time. Tell me there ain't loaded dice in this game, and that the cops ain't on the take. Tell me, please, 'cuz I missed the Easter Bunny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wait -- I thought it was just greedy home owners who caused the mortgage meltdown
:sarcasm:


I also agree with the other poster re: blaming the employees -- that's only valid if the senior managers are also taking the blame AND greater penalties because they are after all senior management, paid to be in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It was only the low income homebuyers that Clinton forced on the market
that caused all of this, get with the program!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I stand corrected!
I forgot---everything is the CLENIS's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC