|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 07:12 PM Original message |
President Obama orders hospital visit rights for gays, lesbians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ingac70
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. kick and rec. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:27 PM Response to Reply #1 |
220. A lot of of you REALLY aren't paying attention to the relevant details. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ingac70
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:36 PM Response to Reply #220 |
226. Hospitals that violate this lose Federal funding. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:26 PM Response to Reply #226 |
228. Not according to the memorandum itself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 04:15 AM Response to Reply #220 |
230. Nor are you paying attention to relevant details. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 03:14 PM Response to Reply #230 |
233. Piffle. Talk to me in 6 months to a year. Show me the "profound effect." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
secondwind
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
2. Perfect. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
3. Well done! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbmk
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:02 AM Response to Reply #3 |
84. Problem will still be there as far as I can tell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:13 AM Response to Reply #84 |
111. A prudent person could draw up a list of allowable visitors, beforehand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:48 PM Response to Reply #111 |
187. But what about people who are not prudent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:58 PM Response to Reply #187 |
202. Well, I don't see there's a hell of a lot any institution can do about people choosing the wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:39 PM Response to Reply #202 |
210. Maybe signatures on powers of attorney should be witnessed or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:45 PM Response to Reply #210 |
211. They already are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:54 PM Response to Reply #210 |
212. As another poster already said, they are witnessed and notarized and it's a different issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:43 PM Response to Reply #111 |
198. Won't stop a hospital from STILL ignoring the wishes of the couple. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:28 AM Response to Reply #3 |
89. When people are very, very sick, hospitals restrict their visitors. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
we can do it
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:39 AM Response to Reply #89 |
117. The Truthful Answer Anytime Is Yes. Let the Bastards Prove Otherwise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:10 AM Response to Reply #117 |
128. Some people don't think to say anything other than what THEY believe to be the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:50 AM Response to Reply #128 |
136. If they don't believe they are related to their partner, maybe they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Change Happens
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
4. Lol...This great President is on fire! I am loving it..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
5. CNN has a FULL story up now, here's the LINK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
6. From what I can tell, it's not just gays. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alphafemale
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 07:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Exactly. a blood relative may be the last person someone would want to see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
28. What could be crueler than using a person's illness (especially if it's a terminal illness) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mopar151
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:07 PM Response to Reply #28 |
59. Right on the mark! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ejpoeta
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:15 AM Response to Reply #9 |
130. that's what health proxys are for. but that requires forethought. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:46 PM Response to Reply #130 |
199. And, as I said upthread - THEY ARE CONSTANTLY IGNORED even with all the paperwork at hand!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 11:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
69. Can you IMAGINE it would ever be any other way....? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awoke_in_2003
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:09 AM Response to Reply #6 |
75. "He wants the patient to be able to decide who can visit" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberty Belle
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:37 AM Response to Reply #6 |
85. Right. It also helps non-English speakers designate a heatlh advocate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:37 AM Response to Reply #6 |
90. the issue tends to arise when the patient may well not be capable of making a decision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:21 PM Response to Reply #6 |
218. What a concept! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tandot
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
7. Good. One step in the right direction. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
8. Good news. Good for the president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dencol
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
10. Great step in the right direction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Delphinus
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
44. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chollybocker
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
11. Thanks, Prez! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SocialistLez
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
12. While I like this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:02 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. But 'regulations' fall in the lap of HHS Sebelius' department. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:43 AM Response to Reply #13 |
92. No law says it has to be a rule, though,. Or a law. It could be one or the other, or both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:26 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. IMO we are very near the start where either there will be legislation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:22 PM Response to Reply #25 |
47. Aren't most of our hospitals now Catholic Church run? Let the whining begin! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:27 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. I don't think so. Maybe in some areas in some states, but not down here in Texas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:34 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. Well, if this causes the Catholic conscience to ache, they'll be asking for exemption... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:10 AM Response to Reply #52 |
110. Not sure why you are singling out Catholics. Evangelicals and others are just as homophobic, if not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:21 AM Response to Reply #110 |
140. First, do Evangelicals run hospitals? Catholic Church does run many of them -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:12 PM Response to Reply #140 |
205. Sure they do. In my home town we had Methodist Hospital, Baptist Hospital |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:55 PM Response to Reply #205 |
221. Agree they are Protestants . . . not necessarily "Evangelicals," tho, are they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:56 PM Response to Reply #110 |
181. I Don't Recall Evangelical Charities Threatening To Move Out Of DC Once Gay Marriage Passed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:02 PM Response to Reply #181 |
222. And it was primarily US Catholic Bishops attacking HCR ... birth control, contraceptives, abortion - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:05 AM Response to Reply #48 |
93. How about other Christian religious hospitals? And it does not even have to be a hospital policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:06 PM Response to Reply #93 |
223. Conversationally . . . "end of life" wishes will also come into play here ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:06 AM Response to Reply #48 |
108. Please see Reply 34. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:48 PM Response to Reply #47 |
200. When I had a heart attack, my partner was ENCOURAGED to go in with me at our Catholic Hospital |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cal Carpenter
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:15 AM Response to Reply #12 |
88. I'd rather see it done through recognition of life partners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:09 AM Response to Reply #88 |
94. Separate but equal is never equal, so "no whatever its name" business. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cal Carpenter
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:24 AM Response to Reply #94 |
99. Marriage, yep, and I apologize for my vagueness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:48 AM Response to Reply #99 |
104. I agree, but there is only so much he can do on his own. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:09 PM Response to Reply #88 |
224. ... and this could get even more interesting in military .... ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:41 AM Response to Reply #12 |
91. It may never get through Congress. Reflect on the abortion rider to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:12 PM Response to Reply #91 |
225. This is such crap with the DADT . . . I'd bet a very few are managing to hold this up ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abacus
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:31 AM Response to Reply #12 |
159. Could, but won't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patsy Stone
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
14. Excellent start. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
15. Excellet! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:48 PM Response to Reply #15 |
63. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Omaha Steve
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
16. K&R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
17. Woo Hoo ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
change_notfinetuning
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
18. Good for Obama. If this is now policy, because of his word alone, he is to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:12 AM Response to Reply #18 |
96. The "word" of a POTUS alone does not result in a rule. There is a rulemaking process. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foxfeet
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
19. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
20. CNN has a FULL story up now, here's the LINK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
21. Good on the Prez!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PatrynXX
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
22. This never should have gone on this long. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:15 AM Response to Reply #22 |
97. You can NOW designate ANYone as your medical proxy, not only a relative by marriage or blood. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
23. Wow - way to go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:34 AM Response to Reply #23 |
101. "Who knew he had that kind of power" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicub
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
24. This is wonderful!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:39 AM Response to Reply #24 |
103. Way better than nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicub
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:53 PM Response to Reply #103 |
189. Agree on the advance directive - it's one of the most important documents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
26. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:36 AM Response to Reply #26 |
102. Probably. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:12 AM Response to Reply #26 |
129. There is no need. The text of the announcement says: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mother Smuckers
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:13 AM Response to Reply #26 |
152. Are you thinking about that 'city of faith' hospital? It closed down years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:18 PM Response to Reply #152 |
215. Didn't know that. Thanks for the update. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beyurslf
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
27. Good idea but we already have a "rule" for that. It is called marriage equality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
29. OMG, what a pleasant surprise! Thank you, Barack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertDiamond
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
30. OK, he scores with me on this one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keepthemhonest
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
31. I think he continue to do great things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
32. Good for Obama! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
33. THAT sure is a step in the correct direction! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freeplessinseattle
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
34. He called Janice Langbehn to personally tell her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzNick
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
35. That'll make us wait for the repeal of DADT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Left Coast2020
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:50 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Oh, the fundies and tea-freaks are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:53 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Good, then they'll have to go th the hospital and have to deal... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:19 AM Response to Reply #37 |
80. Deleted message |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:16 AM Response to Reply #36 |
112. I'm glad it's their turn to do that finally. The rest of us have been ripping our hair out our |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:05 AM Response to Reply #35 |
107. Please see Reply 101. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
38. He has to go under the bus and find em, first! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joey Liberal
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
39. The Tea Baggers will REALLY freak out! Bravo! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:30 PM Response to Reply #39 |
50. Freaking Out looks good on the Bags! This is awesome news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
40. Hey Freeperbaggers, Take a look at the future of military hospital waiting rooms ---> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:33 AM Response to Reply #40 |
115. In all likelihood, military hospital waiting rooms will continue to look like military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:47 AM Response to Reply #115 |
135. Well, yes. Of course. People are people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BreweryYardRat
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
41. Good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:19 AM Response to Reply #41 |
113. Please see Reply ##s 27 and 101. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquid diamond
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
42. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortyfeetunder
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
43. I say WOOHOO with tears in my eyes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
45. K&R -- and compliments to Obama for guts -- !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
46. Kick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southern_belle
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
49. k & r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tilsammans
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
51. Excellent news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bkozumplik
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
53. excellent. well done. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BunkerHill24
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
54. well worth my rec'd and...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beams1969
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
55. Is it just me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudohioan
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:18 AM Response to Reply #55 |
86. Not just you...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
56. K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slay
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
57. Better than nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guilded Lilly
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
58. The Thinking Person's President :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlbertCat
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
60. (read as sing-songy as possible) Huckabee's not gonna like this..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
61. Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Juan_de_la_Dem
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
62. Outstanding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
64. awesome! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tumbulu
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
65. Thank you President Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kind of Blue
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
66. Wow! And it's about time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
67. KnR. We're getting there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alp227
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
68. Just one step in the right direction. Next are MARRIAGE RIGHTS! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
70. K & R. Good for Pres Obama and good riddance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
71. Without marriage how do they prove they are partners? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:44 AM Response to Reply #71 |
78. Yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:03 AM Response to Reply #78 |
126. I do not know of any state that limits your choice of medical proxy or medical agent to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:54 PM Response to Reply #126 |
190. In the case of the woman & partner which inspired Obama's memorandum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:33 AM Response to Reply #78 |
132. That should have been the case now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harry_pothead
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
72. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:25 AM Response to Reply #72 |
114. He's dead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keepCAblue
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:04 PM Response to Reply #114 |
214. Wishful thinking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harry_pothead
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:21 PM Response to Reply #114 |
219. No I was using poetic license |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awoke_in_2003
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:07 AM Response to Original message |
73. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:07 AM Response to Original message |
74. Booyah. Should have always been the case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:39 AM Response to Reply #74 |
118. May depend upon what state we're talking about. Please see Reply 34. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:43 PM Response to Reply #118 |
227. Well, as came up in the union thread earlier, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:38 AM Response to Reply #74 |
134. Its rather common... Esp if the family doesn't approve... they can really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarshalltheIrish
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
76. Excellent news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gtar100
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:32 AM Response to Original message |
77. That is awesome! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:44 AM Response to Reply #77 |
145. Deleted message |
ccharles000
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:04 AM Response to Original message |
79. k/r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daughter of liberty2
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:32 AM Response to Original message |
81. This made my day! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
impik
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:44 AM Response to Original message |
82. “It’s a huge deal” |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:01 AM Response to Original message |
83. Text of President Obama's memorandum/statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:32 AM Response to Reply #83 |
131. You must stil have legal, signed,advance directives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillWilliam
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:24 AM Response to Reply #131 |
157. Exactly. One has to read all the way to the bottom of the memo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:59 PM Response to Reply #157 |
203. Wrong. Obama has ordered HHS to create the rule. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillWilliam
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:37 PM Response to Reply #203 |
209. Let's take a count, shall we: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:57 PM Response to Reply #131 |
201. No one ever said that the rule was in place as of now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lamp_shade
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:44 AM Response to Original message |
87. This is wonderful news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:10 AM Response to Original message |
95. At last! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Betty Karlson
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:21 AM Response to Original message |
98. What took him so long? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:43 AM Response to Reply #98 |
119. Perhaps he needed enactment of the health care reform bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeff In Milwaukee
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:25 AM Response to Original message |
100. This will confuse and perplex the conservatives.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:52 AM Response to Original message |
105. Great, another grand gesture that really does not mean shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:52 AM Response to Reply #105 |
123. Please see Reply ##s 34 and 101. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:08 AM Response to Reply #105 |
139. From one of us "nice straight folks" out here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CLANG
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:55 AM Response to Original message |
106. A.F.T. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mad_Dem_X
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:07 AM Response to Original message |
109. Wonderful news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:38 AM Response to Original message |
116. CHANGE we can believe in! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Soylent Brice
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:44 AM Response to Original message |
120. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:45 AM Response to Original message |
121. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:52 AM Response to Original message |
122. Of course, the need for such special rules come from our lack of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mahatmakanejeeves
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:56 AM Response to Original message |
124. Ken Cuccinelli |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:08 AM Response to Reply #124 |
127. Will a federal court even hear a challenge to the rule before the rule is actually made? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onpatrol98
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:57 AM Response to Original message |
125. Should Have Happened A LOOOOOOOOOOOG time ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:35 AM Response to Original message |
133. Good Job Mr. President.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThatsMyBarack
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
137. ThatsMyBarack! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
138. The upright straights will have to share their hospitals with teh h-h-h-homosexuals? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mahatmakanejeeves
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
141. Great comment at CNN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crazylikafox
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:52 AM Response to Reply #141 |
147. Wow! How true. GOBAMA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
142. Out-goddamn-standing! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
143. You People Realize This Is Meaningless, Right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:40 AM Response to Reply #143 |
144. And Another Thing...Gay Equality Is Not About Pissing Off Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:10 AM Response to Reply #144 |
163. I tend to agree with T-Lad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mother Smuckers
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:35 AM Response to Reply #163 |
167. That's hilarious...in a kinda tragic way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:16 PM Response to Reply #144 |
206. I agree. I get sick of the sporting event model of politics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:09 AM Response to Reply #143 |
150. I really need to see the meat of this -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:12 AM Response to Reply #150 |
151. Someone Posted the Full Text Upthread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:43 AM Response to Reply #151 |
170. OK, just read it -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:08 PM Response to Reply #170 |
183. It's because the memo ITSELF doesn't create new regulations, the memo orders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:01 AM Response to Reply #143 |
162. Um, sorry but that's total bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mother Smuckers
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:23 AM Response to Reply #162 |
164. Well, if this snip from the text doesn't mean what it says, what DOES it mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:12 PM Response to Reply #164 |
172. The more I read it, the more I am happy with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:25 AM Response to Reply #162 |
165. I Read It. Did YOU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:13 PM Response to Reply #165 |
173. Um yes. The MEMO ITSELF does not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:27 PM Response to Reply #173 |
174. Oh, Really? How? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:39 PM Response to Reply #174 |
176. That's not at all what it says. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:42 PM Response to Reply #176 |
177. And How Do You Suppose It's Going To Do That? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:07 PM Response to Reply #177 |
182. OK, what don't you get about this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:11 PM Response to Reply #182 |
192. Well, I Guess We'll See, Won't We? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:12 PM Response to Reply #177 |
184. HHS is already authorized by law to setup rules for HHS funding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
146. Kicked and recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlancheSplanchnik
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
148. President Obama is a great man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mother Smuckers
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
149. I sure hope this doesn't end up being a setback, it basically neutralizes one of the more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:13 AM Response to Reply #149 |
153. It Doesn't Neutralize Anything. It Doesn't Change Anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mother Smuckers
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:19 AM Response to Reply #153 |
156. You don't think the fundies will use it as ammunition against our quest for equality? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:36 AM Response to Reply #156 |
160. Then Why Not Do Something That Actually MEANS Something? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mother Smuckers
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:43 AM Response to Reply #160 |
161. I absolutely agree with that, hence my somewhat cynical comment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:06 PM Response to Reply #149 |
204. It "neutralizes" NOTHING! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 03:12 PM Response to Reply #204 |
232. You are so correct, Tank. It is meaningless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DirkGently
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
154. Good, basic housekeeping measure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllyCat
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
155. It's about damn time! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
158. Daaaaammmmnnnn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:29 AM Response to Reply #158 |
166. Deleted message |
jeremyfive
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
168. Thank you. God bless Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mother Smuckers
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:40 AM Response to Reply #168 |
169. What if a hospital decides to ignore this suggestion? There's no legal remedy for that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 04:10 PM Response to Reply #169 |
234. You are missing the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:55 AM Response to Reply #168 |
171. He Didn't DO Anything. He Did What He Always Does: Talk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:10 PM Response to Reply #171 |
191. You are willfully misconstruing this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:14 PM Response to Reply #191 |
193. Fine. I'll Concede Your Point and Wait Until the "Rules" Are Established. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:33 PM Response to Reply #193 |
196. Just like in my business, a proposed 'rule' is just so much vaporware. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:24 PM Response to Reply #196 |
207. I Hope YOU'RE Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patriot 76
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
175. It's a start. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
178. GLAAD Applauds Presidential Memorandum Adding Hospital Visitation Protections for Same-Sex Couples |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:51 PM Response to Reply #178 |
179. I Guess We Have Equality Now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:13 PM Response to Reply #179 |
185. I understand your frustration, but him making a point to even discuss this issue and make this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
180. Congratulations, President Obama! Do the Right Thing and We'll get YOUR Back and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tracer
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
186. What hospital asks for a patient's sexual orientation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicub
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
188. To the people on this thread who sadly think this is a token gesture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:19 PM Response to Reply #188 |
195. You Don't Understand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
194. This is great news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
197. About fucking time - LONG overdue! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katty
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
208. great step forward, now let's get to legal/POA for partner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
213. Here's what I think this might actually mean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mother Smuckers
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:41 PM Response to Reply #213 |
216. Thanks, I believe and most earnestly HOPE you're right about that. What do you think about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
217. It's about time! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Socal31
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 01:56 AM Response to Original message |
229. Why, in the f-ing world, would anyone be against this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 03:10 PM Response to Reply #229 |
231. Let me tell you a story, a true story: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UndecidedGuy
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
235. Why would anyone think this is a bad thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC