Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Coast Guard: NEW oil leak in Gulf of Mexico

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:02 PM
Original message
Coast Guard: NEW oil leak in Gulf of Mexico
Source: AP

NEW ORLEANS – The Coast Guard says a new leak has been found at the site where an oil platform exploded and sank in the Gulf of Mexico.

Rear Adm. Mary Landry says that 5,000 barrels a day is now estimated to be leaking. Officials had been saying for days that it was 1,000 barrels a day.

She also says the Secretary of Homeland Security has briefed the president on this new information. She says the government has offered to have the Department of Defense help contain the spill.

Rear Admiral Mary Landry says National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration experts upgraded the figure based on aerial surveys, study of the trajectory of the oil slick and other factors.

Officials say the leading edge of the oil was nearing the Louisiana coast.



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100429/ap_on_bi_ge/us_louisiana_oil_rig_explosion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Spill baby, spill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Perfectly said.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. +1000. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. First ot was zero barrels leaking
Then 1000 per day.

Now 5000 per day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. And it will take months to seal, yet no change of plans to open new coastal drill areas.
Yish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Maybe less new drilling?
Since all the #%#@!##$!^% oil is now spilling out of the Gulf .
There won't be enough left to drill new wells for.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yep. Considering a collapsed, kinked pipe is the flow restrictor
this could get worse by the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
26. Yep
It makes one wonder what the true number is..drill baby dril :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. "offered to have the Department of Defense help contain the spill"
There we go . . socializing the risks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. The gov't should sue for the costs
This is just the BEGINNING of the REAL damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Agree. However, I expect a Price–Anderson act to indemnify the oil industry
from offshore spills.

The private profits MUST BE PROTECTED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. +
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
31. If you mean that they'd have to buy copious amounts of insurance before hand.
That I doubt, because it would mean higher gas prices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Good point n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CLANG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Yeah, the ocean is too big to fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is bad news indeed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. When all the lies stop -- who's going to pay for this damage? BP ... ??? Doubt it!!
Insurance?

Who could possibly insure against anything like this catastrophe --???

Same as the nuclear crap -- can't possibly be insured -- can't possibly be

guaranteed to be safe -- and no one but the people can possibly cope and pay

for damage on this scale !!!

Capitalism is simply exploitation -- suicidal exploitation of nature!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jumping John Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. Will the taxpayer take the hit or will BP pay for all this help???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Didn't you get the memo? They privatize the profits but socialize the true costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Either BP will or it will come out of the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund
BP is responsible for all the cleanup under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. If they should fail to pay for any part the the Oil Spill clean up then the Liability Trust Fund is used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. 51.429 days to Exxon Valdez volume using the new 5000 bbl/dy rate n/t
Edited on Wed Apr-28-10 10:25 PM by Strelnikov_
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CLANG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. The people of Louisiana and Mississippi will get there sooner, I'm afraid.
I know you're talking oil volume, but the true impact of Exxon Valdez was not known to many Americans. By photograph, yes, but when it is in your own backyard it is more horrifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #17
30. Biloxi had some of the best beaches in the world before Katrina.
They were just getting things fairly back to normal, too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CLANG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. 1000, do I hear five? Five thousand! Can anyone make it10?
Not good. Not good at all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dencol Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
20. BP should have all US assets seized...
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 12:02 AM by dencol
And sold off to the highest bidder. And the execs should be tried for environmental terrorism. That's what should happen to companies who are so negligent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
21. I was wondering when anyone was going to notice that many wells
are drilled from one platform location, up to 96, depending on the platform.

No telling how big this mess is going to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
23. An oil spill expert on BBC World Service just said
that this will likely be the worst oil spill in history when all is said and done. Far larger than the Exxon Valdez spill. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Would apparently take less than two months.
The leak now appears so great that it's calculated that in less than two months it could match the 11m-gallon spill from the oil tanker Exxon Valdez off Alaska in 1989.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8650620.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. "The Exxon Valdez [tanker disaster off Alaska in 1989] is going to pale [into insignificance]...
...in comparison to this as it goes on."

Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doug.Goodall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
25. More pollution for the Earth to deal with
BP needs to be forced to pay for the clean up and then pay equivalent matching funds for wind power to offset the use of oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
28. Rear Adm. Mary Landry SHILLING for British Petroleum
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 06:35 AM by saigon68
Just a couple of days ago this Imbecile was saying "NO OIL IS LEAKING"

Lies repeated become lies Believed.

She swills deeply on the Govt Trough

PIG

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
29. Its too bad that
We can't get these "Lets drill for Oil" conservatives to go out there and help clean up the mess. Maybe If Sarah Palin was out there for a few hours, she might learn something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
33. Backup system failed; fail-safe system failed, ah technology
WSJ reports that an acoustic shut-off device isn't on the rig. Apparently the Dept. of Interior Minerals Division decided not to require those for deep-water rigs because at $500K they were "too expensive".

Isn't the DOI Minerals Div all the guys & gals that were exposed partying with the oil company execs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC