|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
cal04
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 05:04 PM Original message |
Military tells Congress to keep gay ban for now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
1. otherwise known as - run out the clock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
2. The military can do this overnight. The bigots are stonewalling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 05:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. Of course. Fuck them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bette Noir
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
3. If Truman had waited until there was no opposition in the ranks, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomm2thumbs
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 05:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 02:29 AM Response to Reply #3 |
37. Opposition in the ranks, or opposition in the Pentagon? I don't believe the ranks are really the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 02:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
53. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
4. Bastards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TriMera
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 05:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. According to SLDN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
5. A plan? How about: it's been nice working with you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
6. f*ck the military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pundaint
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 07:39 PM Response to Reply #6 |
20. Defund the military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
8. I thought we were supposed to be in charge of them..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 06:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. I thought the head of the military disagrees. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
24601
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:11 AM Response to Reply #13 |
48. The two most senios "heads of the military" are The President and SECDEF n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 11:38 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. And one of them works for the other. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
24601
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 06:43 AM Response to Reply #48 |
51. Oops - my bad - edit "senios" to read "senior" and - not to make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
10. Oh, noes! Opposition in the ranks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemoTex
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 08:16 PM Response to Reply #10 |
23. Eggs-actly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
12. Funny...I thought the CIC was supposed to support a repeal of DADT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
24601
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 09:07 PM Response to Reply #12 |
26. It's tricky because it's still the law and you can't just pick & choose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 09:42 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. He can still do a hell of a lot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 12:42 AM Response to Reply #27 |
31. SecDef makes the call, not the CiC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 12:59 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. And the CIC is SecDef's boss. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 01:15 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 01:25 AM Response to Reply #33 |
34. One of us is confused about how things work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 02:08 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. One of us is confused about how Obama works. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 03:43 AM Response to Reply #35 |
40. Oh, please. A commander in chief functioning as a Commander in Chief as is his duty under |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 05:16 AM Response to Reply #40 |
43. It's not a game, nobody wins with thread posts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 11:36 PM Response to Reply #35 |
49. Actually, we're both right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 03:52 AM Response to Reply #33 |
41. "Try to appoint?" LOL. And who appointed Gates in the first place? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 05:21 AM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Gates, as SecDef, was an "ease the war transition" move. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
24601
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:06 AM Response to Reply #41 |
47. Bush, after the 2006 midterm election, nominated Gates who was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 04:09 AM Response to Reply #31 |
42. Nope. The CIC has the power. See Reply #38. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 05:26 AM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Well presented, +1. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 11:34 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. No, it is not "tricky" in the least. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 11:43 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. the only "trick" here is the one pulled on the gay community |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 03:17 AM Response to Reply #26 |
38. Baloney. I've typed out the full explanation here so many times, but I will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 08:57 AM Response to Reply #12 |
46. Their position, as they describe it, is "repeal later, not now", not "never repeal." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlbertCat
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
14. until he can come up with a plan for dealing with potential opposition in the ranks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teka
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
15. Thanks for nothing, Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smashcut
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
16. We MUST make sure the homophobes' concerns are addressed! It's THEIR stories that matter!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 11:22 PM Response to Reply #16 |
28. exactly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
17. good thing there's a fierce advocate in the WH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
18. The militrary commands the civilian leadship? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walk away
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
19. I smell christians!!!!!!!!!!! Fundie Right Wing Christians with a strangle hold on our military. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 08:58 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. You're exactly right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 03:28 AM Response to Reply #19 |
39. They can have a strangehold on our military only if the CIC and/or Congress allow it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
21. Note to Military: Civillian control |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frebrd
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
22. Since when does the military... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Fri Apr-30-10 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
24. Oh, piffle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
36. POTENTIAL opposition in the ranks to what? This is not about gays in the military. By definition, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
52. Here's how you deal with opposition: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC