Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Army Report Clears Soldier Who Killed Reuters Cameraman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodbarnett Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 03:51 PM
Original message
U.S. Army Report Clears Soldier Who Killed Reuters Cameraman
LONDON (AP) - The U.S. Army said Monday that a soldier who fatally shot a Reuters cameraman in Iraq acted according to the rules because he feared the man's camera was a rocket launcher.
An Army summary of its report called the August death of 41-year-old cameraman Mazen Dana "tragic and regrettable."

It said, however, the unidentified soldier who killed Dana had "reasonable certainty" that he was about to fire on a U.S. patrol and acted properly based on the information available at the time.

Reuters disputed that conclusion, saying better communication among soldiers could have prevented Dana's death and that of the news agency's cameraman Taras Protsyuk. He was killed April 8 after a U.S. tank fired at a hotel housing journalists in Baghdad as American forces took the city.

http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGAJ9OR05SD.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tracer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is not the first journalist ...
... whose camera was "mistaken" for a rocket launcher.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. this is not right
I am so very tired of these "investigations" into the killing of civilians and journalists being whitewashed and no one is ever found to have acted "outside the rules of engagement".

I guess the "rules of engagement" mean that it's just dandy to kill anything that lives.

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amich Donating Member (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. it is hard to put yourself in someones shoes
Who know what the shoulder was facing. Maybe he is a jerk and killed the person with no regards to life, but if you are in a war situation i would think you are just trying to survive. and that you are going to fire and ask question later. I don't know luckily I wasn't in during a war time period and didn't have to do more then question myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Hi Amich!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well This Shows....
...the lousy training that the army has been giving personnel, the inability to identify the difference between a rocket launcher and a camera, considering that your standard rocket launcher is about 3 feet long to start with, and shaped like a long cylidrical tube.

And the camera was approximately 2ft and boxed shape.

Yeah, I know the "heat of battle excuse" is going to appear, this
justifies killing anything that might be considered a threat. Based
on this a soldier could shoot a child throwing a rock, because the rock might be mistaken for a hand grenade.

Then again maybe it wasn't the training, maybe the soldier just needed better glasses!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here's a longer version of the Reuters story.
The Army report said the soldier, who shot from a tank, had a "reasonable certainty" that Dana was about to fire a rocket- propelled grenade (RPG), having mistaken his camera for a launcher. But it said the tank commander recognised Dana was holding a camera immediately after the fatal shots were fired.
(snip)

Dana had made his presence known to U.S. troops at the prison and the Palestine was widely known to be a media hotel. But this information was not passed the units that fired.

Dana's widow Suzan said in the Palestinian city of Ramallah: "I am not satisfied with the investigation at all.They said that Mazen did not do anything wrong, but at the same time they did not criticize
the soldier who killed him. They are only trying to justify their actions."
(snip)

Schlesinger said in his statement: "The Pentagon must now accept that independent journalists will always operate in the field outside the embedding process and there need to be sensible and prudent measures to avoid them being killed."
(snip)

~~~~ link ~~~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sagan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. but of course...

Bomb a wedding? No problem. Shoot children? No problem. Bomb allied troops? No problem. Shoot a cameraman? No problem.

At this point, I'm genuinely curious as to what the military WOULD hold someone responsible for.

The "blue wall of silence" ain't got nothing on the olive drab one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yeah, the military "mistakes" these cameras for rocket launchers
Just like inner city cops "mistake" a black man's wallet for a 9 mm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Hmmm
I wonder if the soldier would have "suspected" a rocket launcher
if the cameraman had been white?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. I do not blame the soldier. I blame the leadership. Precautions could have
prevented this needless death. The leadership seems disinterested in preventing the deaths of journalists in Iraq any farther than they are forced to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC