Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP/Milbank: White House Counters Ex-Aide

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 10:55 PM
Original message
WP/Milbank: White House Counters Ex-Aide
Advisers Call Clarke Disgruntled, Partisan

By Dana Milbank and Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, March 23, 2004; Page A01

President Bush's top aides launched a ferocious assault on the former White House counterterrorism official who accused Bush of failing to act on the al Qaeda threat before Sept. 11, 2001, and strengthening terrorists by pursuing a misguided focus on Iraq.

(snip)

Although some Republican leaders defended the White House and joined in denouncing Clarke, others expressed concern that the former aide's accusations would compound a recent fall in Americans' perception of Bush's honesty that began with the flawed charges about Iraq's weapons and the understatement of the costs of Bush's prescription drug initiative.

Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) said he believes the White House has to respond directly to Clarke's allegations rather than question his credibility. "This is a serious book written by a serious professional who's made serious charges, and the White House must respond to these charges," he said.

(snip)

The timing of Clarke's accusations is particularly sensitive for Bush because the independent commission investigating the 2001 attacks is taking public testimony this week from Bush and Clinton administration national security officials about their actions before the attacks. The White House, citing constitutional prerogatives, has declined to allow the commission to take testimony from national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, although she has been interviewed by commission members privately.

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16200-2004Mar22.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, it was funny...


Whats even funnier is what we aren't talking about...Bush's new ads.

You guys lost your message, gave the guy some press to sell his book and took heat off of Kerry.

Good job you fucking morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think you meant MORANS.
I think this is choreographed, and while I hate 'politics as usual' I think the DEM's are doin' it up right!!!!

There is a reek of desperation that my dog would be barkin' at........she knows the primal scent for what it is......fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sagan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hagel knows something

He's distancing himself from Chimpco for a reason. A possible 2008 run at the White House, certainly, but I think there is some other monster lurking that Hagel knows about that we don't, or only surmise at.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Big Time
I think Hagel wants no part of the Bush* disaster. He ain't going down to save his sorry ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hitting him where it hurts
…"About all that's still propping Bush up politically is the very positive impression that most voters have about his performance immediately following the attack," said Democratic operative Jim Jordan. "Anything that contradicts the legend and recasts Bush as weaker and less sure-footed than previously thought is a huge problem for Bush, and Clarke's account certainly does that."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Repukes are focused on the wrong things, as usual
President Bush's top aides launched a ferocious assault on the former White House counter-terrorism official who accused Bush of failing to act on the al Qaeda threat before Sept. 11, 2001, and strengthening terrorists by pursuing a misguided focus on Iraq.

Why launch an "assault" on the official? Why not actively repudiate the charges?

...others expressed concern that the former aide's accusations would compound a recent fall in Americans' perception of Bush's honesty that began with the flawed charges about Iraq's weapons and the understatement of the costs of Bush's prescription drug initiative.

Note that they're not expressing concern over whether the accusations are true or not, they're concerned with Bush's appearance.

Just like a fucking Republican (as born out by Clarke this week): Three thousand Americans die, and they just don't give a shit. "What are our chances at reelection?" they respond. "How can these dead men, women and children further my own personal agenda?" AND WHY DO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NOT SEE THIS AS PLAIN AS DAY!?!?!

:argh:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChompySnack Donating Member (612 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Right on brother
As usual the media will give it a few days and then not follow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. This "ferocious assault" lacks teeth.
The only rebuttal is that Clarke is being partisan and is feeling sour grapes? That's weak, very weak.

Some of the "rebuttals" support Clarke's version. Cheney said on Rush that Clarke "was out of the loop on a lot of this." That's exactly Clarke's point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aprilgirl Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. The book had to be released BEFORE his 9/11 testimony
Otherwise, the on-going investigation might have been a reason to keep the book from being released. One thing, the Paul O'Neill book supports many of the allegations that Clarke is making. Then there are all those resignations of Bush administration officials who could not go along with the focus on Iraq. How much more does the American public need to unseat this quack in the WH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. Wow, Three Out Of His Four Administrations Were Republican
And all of a sudden he's a "Democratic partisan"



















phuckheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. it's been clipped out of the transcript
but Clark did say he expected bush* to send the dogs after him...

regardng the timing of the release of the book...

Clark resigned about 18 months ago.. takes some time to write a book, especially one of this nature which requires some research and assembling of materials before you even start to write it -- then there's the editing process, and other things needed to be done before the book even goes to press -- so 18 months to write and publish a book is not unusual

these accusations by GOPer lemmings is just their attempt to "reframe" the issue and spin it as sour grapes by an ex-employee..

but it's funny - O'Neill, Clark, David Kay and others are all saying the same thing -- information was manipulated to justify invading Iraq

Bush* Lied and people died. Bush* is still lying and people are still dying. Bush* will continue to lie and more people will die.

he's not just a war pResident - he's the death pResident

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. "Lucky me I Hit the Trifecta!"
I think it is time to re-air all of those campaign stops where chimpy* repeated this astoinishingly deplorable line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC