Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA unit's wacky idea: Depict Saddam as gay (2003)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:35 AM
Original message
CIA unit's wacky idea: Depict Saddam as gay (2003)
Source: WP

During planning for the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the CIA's Iraq Operations Group kicked around a number of ideas for discrediting Saddam Hussein in the eyes of his people.

One was to create a video purporting to show the Iraqi dictator having sex with a teenage boy, according to two former CIA officials familiar with the project.

“It would look like it was taken by a hidden camera,” said one of the former officials. “Very grainy, like it was a secret videotaping of a sex session.”

The idea was to then “flood Iraq with the videos,” the former official said.

Another idea was to interrupt Iraqi television programming with a fake special news bulletin. An actor playing Hussein would announce that he was stepping down in favor of his (much-reviled) son Uday.

...

The agency actually did make a video purporting to show Osama bin Laden and his cronies sitting around a campfire swigging bottles of liquor and savoring their conquests with boys, one of the former CIA officers recalled, chuckling at the memory. The actors were drawn from “some of us darker-skinned employees,” he said.

Read more: http://blog.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/05/cia_group_had_wacky_ideas_to_d.html#more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Your tax dollars at work...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheEuclideanOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Geez, who is writing their material? The guys from Southpark?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. yeah, that's the ticket, name him Kenny Hussain, then kill him !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. this part's interesting
“Saddam playing with boys would have no resonance in the Middle East -- nobody cares,” agreed a third former CIA official with extensive experience in the region. “Trying to mount such a campaign would show a total misunderstanding of the target. We always mistake our own taboos as universal when, in fact, they are just our taboos.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Indeed that is interesting.
"We always mistake our own taboos as universal when, in fact, they are just our taboos." There is wisdom in that statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. It's also bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. What about the psyops used here
to convince the public that Saddam was a threat?

Nary a peep.

I'm still surprised when I ask my political science professors is they have heard of the Pentagon pundits; All but one of them have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Didn't Bush the elder purposely mispronounce his name as psy-op?
Instead of the traditional "sod-uhm" he pronounced it "sad-uhm", with the first syllable rhyming with "bad" and "glad". I remember reading that it was similar to the Arabic prounciation of the word for "dog", and dogs are considered nasty vermin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. The word for dog is "khalib"
Any mispronunciation on Bush I's part was aimed squarely at us, and probably meant to sound like "Sodom."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. I did some further research, and the word wasn't
"George H.W. Bush, deliberately mispronounced Saddam Hussein’s name. Putting the emphasis on the wrong syllable, experts say the first President Bush also converted the meaning of the name in Arabic, from sa-DAM, which means one who confronts, to Sad-um, which means a barefoot beggar."

from the website
http://dailyuw.com/2002/10/2/the-news-media-name-iraqs-leader-from-saddam-to/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #29
40. I don't think that is correct, either.
Edited on Thu May-27-10 04:19 PM by No Elephants
"Barefoot" in Arabic sounds something like "hahfee," but I will try to remember to check with an Egyptian friend tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
name not needed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. Kinda like how he used to refer to Mao Tse-Tung as "Mousie Dung"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
38. Transliteration is tricky, but Sid damn would be closer than sod uhm.
Bush's mispronunciation was to associate Saddam with "sad," as in "lame." It had nothing to do with any Arabic word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Saddam Hussein was depicted as Satan's gay lover in several South Park episodes
Hmmm. Does that mean there's a link between CIA and South Park?

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Loved those episodes! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. Don't forget: "Osama bin Laden Has Farty Pants"
(along with Stevie Nicks held in captivity)
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. Did the CIA just admit to faking Osama Bin Laden tapes?
Hmmm.

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugweed Donating Member (939 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. It appears that they freely admit to faking video evidence
I've seen the differences in the facial bones in the first video tape of Osama denying he had anything to do with 9/11/01 and the following Osama video tapes in which he claims to have been a part of it. The latter were fakes made by the CIA and now the CIA is tangentially admitting that they do this on a regular basis. These days they don't even use video and just release an audio cassette. That's why 9/11/01 isn't even listed as the reason Osama is on the FBI Ten Most Wanted list http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm. There is no evidence linking him to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. I think you have just hit upon the actual Nugget O' News in this one
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
32. Yep.
Not that any of the sleeping public would a) notice or b) care anyway.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
35. The truthers are going to go crazy with that
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

They can fake stuff! They can put stuff on tv screens in Iraq they can put CGI planes on CNN!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
46. By George, you've got it! Nice catch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. they did the same darn thing with Sukarno
I also remember the posters of Hussein as Billy Idol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. "... create a video {showing} ... sex with a teenage boy,..."
Edited on Tue May-25-10 12:26 PM by mahatmakanejeeves
I'll bet they were surprised at how many high-ranking Republicans wanted to be in the video. Either role was fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. they probably make all kinds of lewd tapes at taxpayers expense, such oddness from these folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hmmm...sex with young boy's. Wonder how that idea popped into their heads...
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I've read that pederasty is common in the Middle East. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. It is said that in Kandahar...
...birds fly with one wing - and use the other to cover their ass!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Well, it's not "said" in Kandahar.
Colorful, but not local, saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
47. But only when Dr. Rekers visits.
Edited on Thu May-27-10 04:58 PM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. So, the Muslim and Catholic faiths have more in common than one would think.
Commonalities upon which these two opposing religions can build an inter-faith bridge to one another. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
43. Please see Replies 41 and 42.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
41. There used to be a big age difference between men and their brides, but it's much less common now.
I don't believe that man on boy is any more common among Arabs than it is here, maybe much less so. I think someone is spreading that for a reason.

Arab men are more about macho than are Hispanic men. While male kissing as a greeting throws us for a loop, Arab Muslims stone gays, or even worse. I find it very hard to believe they do that, but are perfectly fine with man on boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
36. Well, it's widely known that that Taliban had a preference for young boys
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. Things can be widely believed, yet false. Please see Reply 41.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crowman1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. Just another reason to disband the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
21. The Post has redeemed itself!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
25. "He's so gay!" That's the plan?
Who put junior high boys in charge of the CIA Iraq Operations Group?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #25
44. Wonder how much it cost taxpayers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
28. Another winning idea from the Completely Idiotic Assholes...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
30. I'm so happy they're cutting social programs to fund idiots like these.
Edited on Wed May-26-10 02:12 PM by Wapsie B
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
31. Well, I suppose it's no dumber than the plots the government came up with
to kill Castro in the 60s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurks Often Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
33. Playing Devil's advocate here,
what if it had worked? How many lives on both sides would have been saved?

Granted it was a very long shot, but probably not a very expensive one. This was a low risk, high return gamble that failed.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. They wanted this to spark a civil war in Iraq, deposing Saddam
Which would have caused massive casualties, just like the civil war that actually happened after the Bush invasion.

So, I don't know that it would have mattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #33
45. "High return?" Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurks Often Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #45
49. if it had worked as planned, then yes.
The removal of a dictator who committed genocide on his own people removed from power for the cost of making and distributing some gay porn. I'd consider that a high return (or high pay off).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
34. Rumors of being gay didn't hurt Arafat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
48. same ol' CIA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC