Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Charges, countercharges on 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 04:54 AM
Original message
Charges, countercharges on 9/11
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/03/25/911.commission/

excerpt:

Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage came under sometimes prickly questioning from those members who saw him as Rice's replacement.


Rice has come under fire for not appearing before the panel.

After panel member Richard Ben-Veniste, a Democrat, referred to Armitage as Rice's "doppelganger," Armitage shot back, "I'm not here as Dr. Rice's replacement. I'm here as someone who's been involved in counterterrorism for several administrations over a long period of time."

Ben-Veniste asked Armitage to comment on statements Rice has made recently in the media. When Armitage said he couldn't because he didn't know what Rice had said, Ben-Veniste asked, "Do you own a television?"

"Yes, and it's generally on. And I won't tell you what it's on," Armitage answered, although in an exchange with Commissioner Tim Roemer, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana, he conceded it's tuned to basketball.

The White House refused to let Rice testify at Wednesday's hearing on the grounds that having a sitting national security adviser give public testimony would infringe on executive privilege.

...more...

If "Executive Privilege" prevents these people from speaking under oath - why are they not barred from pandering comments to the news-whores?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Executive Propagandizing"
If "Executive Privilege" prevents these people from speaking under oath - why are they not barred from pandering comments to the news-whores?

great question, one I keep asking myself. However, seems like condi has gotten herself in a pickle. She says Clarke was not out of the loop and cheney on limpball says Clarke was out of the loop. But then again, since she isn't under oath, she can spew lies like a Mt. St. Helenes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlcandie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Condi in her black mode/mood....this picture says a LOT...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. condi-glower
she is fucking frightening!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Have you ever noticed that the woman has almost no chin?
And it seems to be getting smaller all the time, disappearing even more as she talks and talks, lies and lies.

Yeah, she looks angry. But then, she always looked that way when anyone put her on the spot.

The anger is an improvement, sort of. She seems cold without it. Does she have a personal life? Does she have a family, or a significant other? Does she go home to an empty apartment that is as cold and empty as her shriveled heart?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. O leave off the personal stuff
Clarke is also unmarried. So what. Let's stick to what she does and what she says. bush has a wonderful warm loving family life - or so we are told. And look at hisimpact on the world. Ditto Cheney and all the rest of the fun-loving family guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarianJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Executive Privilege...
...is how tricky dickie tried to duck Watergate. Hopefully, it will result in the same outcome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. Somebody's lying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC