Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Says Had No Advance Warning on 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 12:53 AM
Original message
Bush Says Had No Advance Warning on 9/11




Mar 26, 12:17 am ET

By Caren Bohan
NASHUA, N.H. (Reuters) - President Bush insisted on Thursday he had no advance warning of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks and challenged the assertions of a former aide who accused him of not placing a high enough priority on pursuing al Qaeda prior to the tragedy.

Visiting a community college in the election swing state of New Hampshire, Bush tried to shore up his credibility on national security, which may be key to stopping Democrat John Kerry from taking the White House from him in November.

"Had I known that the enemy was going to use airplanes to strike America, to attack us, I would have used every resource, every asset, every power of the government, to protect the American people," Bush said, appearing with Cheryl McGinnis, the wife of a pilot killed in the attacks.

Counterterrorism expert Richard Clarke, who served the last four U.S. presidents, said Bush did not take the threat of Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda organization seriously and downgraded its importance in comparison to the administration of former President Bill Clinton.
http://news.excite.com/politics/article/id/37060|politics|03-26-2004::00:25|reuters.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Too bad we don't have a "Pure Bullshit" forum here at DU
This article could be used as a model for what to throw in there.

Good post. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. It would be Wall Street Journal Editorial thoughts - Like today's thought
that we can not insist that Mr. Bush "should have acted more pre-emptively before 9/11", else we are forbidden to fault "the President's aggressive antiterror policy ever since".

The WSJ sees compliants about Bush pre-911 actions (dropping the urgent view Clinton of terrorist, and Clinton's meeting of "principals" to shake out all knowledge) as being a case of the left saying "Bush didn't repudiate the failed strategy of the Clinton years fast enough."

So now because Bush F'd up pre 911, he gets a pass on civil liberty theft in the Patriot Act, and lies to put us into war with Iraq.

And these are the smart folks in the GOP - LOL

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Lack of action followed by lack of thought.
Par for President Stupid.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. most thinking people
realized this not long after 9-11. it`s been common knowledge and reported for the last two+ yrs. now we have the confirmation from someone who was in the same room with all the players in the the failure to protect the 3000+who died that day.
bush makes himself look childish by attacking someone who has the courage and the humility to say he was sorry for not doing enough to protect the citizens of the united states and our guests. sad day for us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. If that August 6, 2001 PDB contrdicts Bush and if it becomes public
then we need to save every article such as this in which Bush is caught in a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's everywhere
all over the web At TPM, Drudge retort, and truthout. Will Pitt laid out chapter and verse in truthout recently. There's at least 5 cases of planes, in threats, and actual acts before 9/11 . Bush thinks no one sees he's naked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Parse his words carefully
"Had I known that the enemy was going to use airplanes to strike America"

lots of wiggle room:
- nobody could "know" (unless they ordered it) but they could have reasonable suspicions and acted on them (although perhaps spending a month at the pig farm qualifies under that score)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. And people
wonder why he doesn't want to swat flies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. Didn't he and Condi admit that they thought they might only
hijack airplanes, not use them as missiles? I'm sure they did. Well then why doesn't someone ask them why they didn't put everybody on high alert to avert the hijackings -- everyone should have been on the ready to stop and/or thwart a hijacking. NORAD should have been in the air ready to intercept. This guy is so full of shit. God help me understand how the great US of A could produce the likes of Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Lincoln, FDR, Kennedy, etc. and now we'll devolved to George W Asshole Bush*!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordic65 Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. First Pres. stupid enough to arrange his own downfall
Just imagine, after all this, the republican convention coming to New York in september, trying to exploit the tragedy of 9.11. It will backfire like no other political ploy in history...

There is just no way out for *. It cannot be moved. And almost no matter what he does there, he will leave labeled as an con-man caught in the act. The shameless setup of the Convention in NY will be the biggest political blunder ever. But, who expects anything less from the worst Pres. ever?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. This is going to make the Mission Accomplished stunt
look like a good idea.

Pass the popcorn, this is going to be fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. Hi Nordic65!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. He's only raising other questions by answering it that way.
1) Mr. President, why, after the first WTC tower was hit, were jets not scrambled in time to be in NYC airspace before the second airliner struck?

2) Mr. President, why, after being informed of the 9/11 attacks while attending a bookreading at Booker Elementary, did you not immediately assume your duties as Commander in Chief?

Someone ought to grow some balls and put Chimpy on the spot. If he loses his temper on camera, all the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. He meant to say he had no clue about 9/11
and still doesn't. Hell, I would say that too if I was caught in outright lies like that. This is not going away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozvotros Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. Tell it Brother George....
Put your hand on your favorite book and tell the big bad old commission what a good boy you really were. But do it under oath you gutless SOS....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Why should a president have to
testify under oath about what he did or didn't do on the day of the worst terrorist attack in American history? You know you can only force a president to testify publicly about extramarital affairs and the intimate details of their private lives.

Maybe we can get the secret service to testify instead? Why didn't they whisk W out of the room when the 2nd Tower was hit? Who said what to who and when? ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSunWithoutShadow Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
12. Who to Believe?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html

Democratic commission member Richard Ben-Veniste disclosed this week that Rice had asked, in her private meetings with the commission, to revise a
statement she made publicly that "I don't think anybody could have predicted that those people could have taken an airplane and slam it into the World
Trade Center . . . that they would try to use an airplane as a missile." Rice told the commission that she misspoke; the commission has received
information that prior to Sept. 11, U.S. intelligence agencies and Clarke had talked about terrorists using airplanes as missiles.

or

"Had I known that the enemy was going to use airplanes to strike America, to attack us, I would have used every resource, every asset, every power of the government, to protect the American people," Bush said, appearing with Cheryl McGinnis, the wife of a pilot killed in the attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Welcome to DU AnybodyButBush!
:hi:

Glad to have you here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
15. Dumbya says he has a brain.
We've shown that's a lie, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
17. Bush's problem is that Republicans always accentuate the positive and
never look at data that might contradict their decisions.

For example: Republicans were the first to laugh off skin cancer due to ozone depletion and they don't take global warming seriously. Because they don't believe that these things are an issue, they can then proceed with their plans to level our forests. If ozone and global warming don't exist, then what stands in the way of destroying the forests that can improve the negative environmental trends?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
18. I'm so sick of this line of crap.
Edited on Fri Mar-26-04 10:13 AM by Sentinel Chicken
Even if you don't know specifically which plane is going to be hijacked, if you know that there is a threat to commercial aircraft and passengers then you can increase the security around airports and at check-in counters. This is an excuse that only the ignorant would buy.

These guys knew there was a threat in the summer of 2001. They decided that it was too dangerous to fly on commercial air liners for them. Their only response was to hire private jets for themselves so they could save their own candy asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreegone Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
19. Yeah George
You knew they were going to get the airliners you just didn't know which flights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
20. He didn't know
the flight numbers of the hijacked planes. I'd give him that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
21. Gee, *George- jeb seemed to know something was coming.
Changing standing orders for the Florida National Guard to include the words terrorism in an executive order dated September 7th, would indicate Something, wouldn't it?

>snip<
Section 3.

The Florida National Guard may order selected members on to state active duty for service to the State of Florida pursuant to Section 250.06(4), Florida Statutes, to assist FDLE in performing port security training and inspections. Based on the potential massive damage to life and property that may result from an act of terrorism at a Florida port, the necessity to protect life and property from such acts of terrorism, and inhibiting the smuggling of illegal drugs into the State of Florida, the use of the Florida National Guard to support FDLE in accomplishing port security training and inspections is "extraordinary support to law enforcement" as used in Section 250.06(4), Florida Statutes.
http://sun6.dms.state.fl.us/eog_new/eog/orders/2001/september/eo2001-261-09-07-01.html

Didn't he let you know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
22. "I am not a crook."
"I am not a murderer."

"I am not responsible."

"I am not accountable."

"I am not wrong."

"I am not sorry."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rexcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
23. This is probably true since they weren't looking for it anyway!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zerex71 Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
25. Hmm, that's funny...
Because I seem to recall, during my five-month layoff (yes, Virginia, things were pretty much lousy from Day One of the Bush Regime), that CNN was falling all over itself with reports of al Qaeda "chatter". It was almost at the Condit level by that time, and I clearly recall that aQ was practically writing the CNN crawl for them - "Al Qaeda: We are about to kick your ass". So don't tell me, Señor Flightsuit, that you didn't have any advance warning!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Hi Zerex71!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC