Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Heat Waves Could Be Commonplace in the US by 2039

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Elmore Furth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 08:09 PM
Original message
Heat Waves Could Be Commonplace in the US by 2039
Source: Science Daily

ScienceDaily (July 9, 2010) — Exceptionally long heat waves and other hot events could become commonplace in the United States in the next 30 years, according to a new study by Stanford University climate scientists.

"In the next 30 years, we could see an increase in heat waves like the one now occurring in the eastern United States or the kind that swept across Europe in 2003 that caused tens of thousands of fatalities," said Diffenbaugh, a center fellow at Stanford's Woods Institute for the Environment. "

In that scenario (examined by the study) , the mean global temperature in 30 years would be about 3.6 degrees F (2 degrees C) hotter than in the preindustrial era of the 1850s. Many climate scientists and policymakers have targeted a 2-degree C temperature increase as the maximum threshold beyond which the planet is likely to experience serious environmental damage. For example, in the 2009 Copenhagen Climate Accord, the United States and more than 100 other countries agreed to consider action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions "so as to hold the increase in global temperature below 2 degrees Celsius."

"Our results suggest that limiting global warming to 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial conditions may not be sufficient to avoid serious increases in severely hot conditions," Diffenbaugh said.

Read more: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/07/100708122617.htm



A recent NASA report, which concluded that the previous decade, January 2000 to December 2009, was the warmest on record. The latest computer model suggests that even modest increases in global temperature may have drastic climate effects.

This computer projection predicts harsh effects in the American West: From 2030 to 2039, most areas of Utah, Colorado, Arizona and New Mexico could endure at least seven seasons equally as intense as the hottest season ever recorded between 1951 and 1999. This doesn't even take into account of what could happen in Mexico and the possible mass emegration from the country as crops fail. And there could be really large effects even before 2039, according to the study.




This has been a hot, wretched week in the Northeastern US. But as heat waves go, this one was pretty mild — especially compared to these seven examples.

It's easy to underestimate the danger of a severe heat wave, and more flamboyant weather events, like hurricanes, tend to draw more attention. But these slow-motion natural disasters can kill hundreds, or even thousands, of people at a time. And thanks to climate change, experts predict that they're only going to get worse. According to a recent Stanford study, prolonged heat waves could be common in the US by 2039.

So here are seven modern events that give us a hint of what to look forward to:


London, The Great Stink, 1858


NYC & Philly, 1948


Australia 2009


New York City, 1977


North America, 1936


Chicago, 1995

The CDC had warned American cities for years they needed emergency plans for extreme heat, but few listened. In July 1995, Chicago got walloped with triple-digit temperatures, exacerbated by high humidity. Desperate for a way to cool off, people opened so many fire hydrants that many buildings lost water pressure entirely. Social forces combined with an ineffective response to make this an unusually deadly heat wave. Many victims were elderly and lived alone, often in neglected neighborhoods with high crime. That left them afraid to leave their homes, but with no one to check on them. Then the city government didn't respond fast enough, refusing to call in extra staff or ambulances and waiting until bodies piled up to declare an emergency. Because no one could agree on what "heat-related deaths" mean, estimated casualties range from 400-700 people.


Europe, 2003



The 7 Most Miserable Heat Waves in Modern History
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I love and cherish our earth, but I'm glad I'll be dead by then. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Don't count on it -- we had weeks and weeks of very hot weather here in NJ ...
and we went into the 100's -- and looks like we have very hot 90 degree days still

ahead of us.

As I've said in another post here -- no one knows how all of this will accelerate and

compound.

It's the Twilight Zone --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. We've been hitting the mid 90's here in Seattle! Meanwhile my best friend is
loving the mid-high 70's in Los Angeles!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Po_d Mainiac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. They are commonplace in 2010
Halfway between the 0 and 90deg north latitude should not feel like Central America (not Quayle's CA of Kansas)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Takeaway: plant shade trees now.
Your descendants will thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R -- this will all begin to accelerate and compound . . . has to --
Edited on Fri Jul-09-10 10:13 PM by defendandprotect
40% of the stuff that came up with the oil "spill" is methane gas which creates

Global Warming! We just don't stop!

We've known about Global Warming since 1950's ... that was our chance.

The original view was that Global Warming had a 50 year delay -- that means we

have reached about 1960 on the human activity scale which created Global Warming --

and the effects we have been feeling and seeing so far.


I'd also throw in my pitch for NOT building any more nuclear plants --

Global Warming will produce more intense hurricanes, more cyclones, tornadoes,

earthquakes -- according to the Pentagon.

From what I've read, it takes at least 6 months to shut down a nuclear power plant

properly.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. What does not using nuclear power have to do with global warming?
If anything nuclear power is needed so we can stop releasing stuff that heats the atmosphere.
It is our love of burning stuff for energy and releasing the end product into the atmosphere that is catching up with us and causing global warming. Nuclear energy doesn't do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Do you consider nuclear power "Green" . . . ???
Consider the damage that a nuclear event could do vs what has just happened in the

Gulf which is horrific enough!

Wow!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Nuclear power is far greener than oil, that is for sure.
11 people that we know of have directly been killed because of that gulf oil alone. It has sickened many thousands more. It has basically killed off an entire ecosystem in the gulf. And this doesn't include other 'accidents' at various refineries in the last year alone.

No one has died because of nuclear power in this country. No ecosystems have been wiped out. So which is really greener and safer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Nuclear power is a disaster waiting to happen . . .
Plus it uses petroleum -- and involves leaking -- and HUGE WASTE PROBLEMS --

It's so dangerous it's uninsurable except by taxpayers!!

So why would anyone be recommending anything so dangerous?


No one has "died" immediately from nuclear power -- nor do we know what effect

nuclear may have had on our environment or humans -- and that's only because there's so much

money involved that no serious studies are being done by government.

Was Chernobyl "greener" -- was it "safer" --

How about three mile island --

Keep in mind how assuring the corporations are when they want a pass -- and how

impotent they are when something actually goes wrong --

In the case of BP something quite predictable!!

Nuclear power plants are also in the hands of private corporations --

and they have many problems with maintenance and security -- we shouldn't be adding

more plants.

And certainly taxpayers shouldn't be being asked to fund or insure them!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunnySong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Nuculear power is green... your new electric car isn't going to run on Unicorn farts. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. List of nuclear accidents:
Edited on Sat Jul-10-10 10:30 PM by truthisfreedom
Sixty-three accidents have occurred at nuclear power plants. Twenty-nine of these have occurred since the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, and 71 percent of all nuclear accidents (45 out of 63) occurred in the United States.<2><3> There have been comparatively few fatalities associated with nuclear power plant accidents, but there has often been significant property damage.<1>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_and_radiation_accidents

Nuclear power plants inevitably have accidents. Nuclear accidents are NOT green. Nor is nuclear waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. They don't spend a great deal of time outdoors, do they.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think
too many people look at the date and say, "well, it won't affect me" and be fine with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. As if we're going to be able to hold it to 2c
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngant17 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. a hot future
If greenhouse effect is essentially irreversible, what's the point of saving for retirement? What's the point if you are going to save money and retire, to live in a super-heated environment, a Venus-like hellish atmosphere? There is no sustainable future on the road we're going. Whether it happens 50 years from now, or 500 years from now isn't important. What is important is to imagine a long-term sustainable future which would necessarily have to be radically different from what we are living today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KillCapitalism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-10 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. Bummer :(
I wish I could afford a summer home in Greenland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC