Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Retired Brass Urge Delay in Antimissile Shield

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
gWbush is Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 01:12 PM
Original message
Retired Brass Urge Delay in Antimissile Shield
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=564&ncid=564&e=14&u=/nm/20040326/ts_nm/arms_missile_usa_dc


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A group of 49 retired U.S. generals and admirals is urging President Bush (news - web sites) to postpone the scheduled deployment this year of a multibillion dollar missile shield and spend the money instead on securing potential terror targets. In a letter to be released at a news conference Friday, the officers, including retired Admiral William Crowe, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1985 to 1989, described the complex technology as untested and a poor use of scarce defense dollars.


"As you have said, Mr. President, our highest priority is to prevent terrorists from acquiring and employing weapons of mass destruction," said the letter made available to Reuters.
As the "militarily responsible course of action," the signers urged funds earmarked for missile defense go instead to bolster nuclear weapons depots and protect U.S. ports and borders against terrorists.


Bush has asked Congress for $10.2 billion for missile defense in the fiscal year starting Oct. 1, a 13 percent increase from the year before. Over the next five years, the administration plans to spend $53 billion on the project.
The shield's initial goal is to protect against one or two warheads that could be launched by North Korea (news - web sites). But in their letter the retired brass said the United States already was able to pinpoint the source of a ballistic missile launch.
"It is, therefore, highly unlikely that any state would dare to attack the U.S. or allow a terrorist to do so from its territory with a missile armed with a weapon of mass destruction, thereby risking annihilation from a devastating U.S. retaliatory strike," they wrote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cool!
Let's hear it for the strong and the brave!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC