Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rice Discusses Terror, but Not Under Oath (Public Relations Nightmare) AP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 07:57 PM
Original message
Rice Discusses Terror, but Not Under Oath (Public Relations Nightmare) AP
"WASHINGTON - Condoleezza Rice (news - web sites) says the Bush administration has a good story to tell about fighting terrorism and she's pouring it out in television appearances, interviews and newspaper articles. The one place she won't talk is in public, under oath, before the independent commission investigating the Sept. 1, 2001, terrorist attacks.

"That is blossoming into a public relations nightmare."

Full Story: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040326/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/rice_hot_seat_1


I could not find this same story, so I hope this is not a dupe. In any event, the AP is now calling Rice's refusal to testify under oath a blossoming public relations nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now more than ever the Dems need a couple Repub senators to jump ship
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Like Howard Baker Did, NSMA.
Under Oath, Condi.........or shut up altogether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. I suspect
she will stop going on talk shows pretty soon since she is always asked why she won't testify in public under oath. THe separation of powers babble is wearing thin. SOmeone needs to remind her that 9/11 changed everything...

MzPip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. She will be on 60 Minutes
with Ed Bradley Sunday. Let's see if Ed gets a "chubby" during the interview!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Credibilty?
Ms Rice's credibilty is going down the tubes. Since most Americans don't pay much attention to details and form opinions mainly from perceptions, Ms Rice not appearing in public before the commission has the perception that she is hiding info. Ergo, her credibilty is waning rapidly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. YES! 911 changed everything!
The Repukes keep saying that 911 changed everything and that's why we have to shut up and accept (insert appropriate outrage here).

We should turn the table and the phrase on them. Condi HAS to waive privelege and testify in public under oath regardless of precedent because...

911 changed everything.

Perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'll say anything...but I won't swear to it.
Translation: I'm lying through my teeth, but nobody ever got convicted of perjury for lying to reporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Scott McClellan: What's the Difference Between Private & Public Testimony?
Duh........one is open for the public to hear the lies for themselves and the other is secret...maybe?????

"I don't know necessarily what the difference is" between a private interview and public testimony, presidential spokesman Scott McClellan said. "She's going to tell it exactly how it happened," he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Locking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC