First Orszag, then Romer resign, with Romer's resignation seeming contentious despite the usual "time with the family" explanation:
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/06/nation/la-na-romer-resigns-20100806Romer had clashed with Obama's top economic advisor, Lawrence Summers, over her access to the president, though administration officials said she was not leaving because of any personality conflict or policy differences.
~~~
In his book "The Promise," Jonathan Alter wrote that in 2009, Romer complained that Summers was excluding her from important meetings. During one argument, Summers shouted, "Don't you threaten me!" while Romer replied, "Don't you bully me!" the book says.
A senior Obama administration official said in an interview that "there were some tensions early on in the administration as everyone settled into their roles. But Christy and Larry have emerged as two quite tightly allied economists on the economic team."
Romer did not prevail in some crucial policy debates. She had called for a larger economic stimulus than the $787-billion package that Obama ultimately embraced. But White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and others feared that if the stimulus were any bigger, it would create a kind of "sticker shock" that would make passage impossible.
Now we have this news. Wouldn't this be something along the line of the "larger economic stimulus" Romer was calling for?
Or am I interpreting this incorrectly?