|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Sep-02-10 06:57 PM Original message |
Judge removes 'birther' elements from Army doc's court martial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alp227
![]() |
Thu Sep-02-10 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
1. Judge removes 'birther' elements from Army doc's court martial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b
![]() |
Thu Sep-02-10 07:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. As predicted... he is f__ked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Sun Sep-05-10 12:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
26. He denied an order and a troop movement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladywnch
![]() |
Thu Sep-02-10 08:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Any military folk........ can he appeal this stuff? If so, how far can he appeal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Thu Sep-02-10 09:11 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yes, he can appeal, but only after the trial and once he is sentenced (if Convicted) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladywnch
![]() |
Thu Sep-02-10 10:07 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. thank you very much for this explanation. I didn't realize military trials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark
![]() |
Fri Sep-03-10 10:57 AM Response to Reply #6 |
13. The military court will be intereseted in several things - If the Colonel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladywnch
![]() |
Fri Sep-03-10 11:16 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I knew he was toast, I just didn't know how long he could drag out the process. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Fri Sep-03-10 12:24 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. This comes up in cases if Illegal Orders, the law presumes all orders are legal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate
![]() |
Fri Sep-03-10 04:12 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Fascinating, especially the reference to Canon Law, which goes back to the Middle Ages. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Sun Sep-05-10 11:18 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. I found that clause of Canon Law when looking something else up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik
![]() |
Fri Sep-03-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. his delusions as well--he bought in to that nonsense, so it's on his shoulders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Fri Sep-03-10 11:49 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Abandon him? He'll be a "political prisoner" and "martyr of the cause"! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark
![]() |
Fri Sep-03-10 03:41 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. You might have a long wait for that - very few people stay in Leavenworth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu Sep-02-10 11:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Thanks for the info and links! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savalez
![]() |
Fri Sep-03-10 05:40 PM Response to Reply #5 |
23. Now that's a fact-filled response! Impressive. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher
![]() |
Mon Sep-06-10 03:23 AM Response to Reply #5 |
28. Will he also be required to pay back the cost of his education? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Sep-03-10 06:09 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Deleted message |
happyslug
![]() |
Fri Sep-03-10 11:44 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. What his distractors want does NOT exist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate
![]() |
Fri Sep-03-10 04:25 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Sonovagun. There it is in the law based on the case of Congresswoman Bryan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher
![]() |
Mon Sep-06-10 03:27 AM Response to Reply #22 |
29. Me too, wish I could double dog rec this thread on account of happyslug's contributions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots
![]() |
Fri Sep-03-10 07:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
12. Out of curiosity, what is the purpose of copying and pasteing the original post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brother Buzz
![]() |
Fri Sep-03-10 11:10 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Our efficient moderators combined threads for our reading enjoyment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Thu Sep-02-10 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
3. Well, that's no surprise. The alternative would invite every crackpot in uniform |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
47of74
![]() |
Thu Sep-02-10 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
8. TRENDING: Judge removes ‘birther’ elements from Army doc's court martial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier
![]() |
Thu Sep-02-10 11:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Granstanding BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tansy_Gold
![]() |
Thu Sep-02-10 11:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
24601
![]() |
Sat Sep-04-10 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
24. The President's is irrelevant and in any case, he didn't any orders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Sep-05-10 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
25. Deleted message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC