Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Murkowski: I'm 'still in this game'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 05:21 PM
Original message
Murkowski: I'm 'still in this game'
Edited on Tue Sep-07-10 05:21 PM by RamboLiberal
Source: Anchorage Daily News

A week after conceding the GOP primary, U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski says she's not a quitter and "still in this game."

Murkowski told The Associated Press on Tuesday that she's been inundated with calls and e-mails from supporters, asking her not to leave the race. She says she's been humbled, and is listening -- and weighing her options.





Read more: http://www.adn.com/2010/09/07/1442857/libertarian-candidate-says-he.html



I'm actually rooting for Murkowski to find a way to get on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. The last time a defeated U.S. Senator stayed in the race in Alaska after the primary was 1968
That year, it was Ernest Gruening, one of only two senators to have voted against the Gulf of Tonkin resolution. He'd been beaten in the Democratic primary by Mike Gravel, who pretty much ran as LBJ's instrument of revenge against Gruening and his antiwar position.

As an independent, Gruening took 10%. And he was someone who was actually admired by millions of people all around the country, unlike Lisa, who's still basically unknown outside Alaska.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. oh please please stay in
split the jackass vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Ahem... you mean the elephant vote

A brief introduction to the habits of the circus elephant, by JFK:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXEkz6ksxdk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Nahh, Pukes are usually pretty good about not splitting their vote. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. not this time. they truly hate miller up here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Explains why he won the primary.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. you don't know the politics. the one vote voters came out and
they voted for the abortion notification thing. that is why he had the turnout. I think I know what I'm talking about. :crazy: backatcha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Ahem...Do you remember Ross Perot?
A lot of my Republican relations voted for him because they hated Poppy Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. He drew about the same number of Dems though, from what I remember.
It's not a rule that's never broken, but on the whole Pukes usually vote strategically and in a unified manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good.
We should contribute to http://www.scottmcadams.org/.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Run Lisa run ... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fuck yeah! Split the vote! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Lisa, Darling, Give It UP Already!
Nobody likes you. Go eat worms or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's impossible for her to make the ballot
Unless by some strange miracle, the final count of mostly overseas absentee ballots produces a net gain of about 2,000 votes for her tomorrow. Until then, she just looks like a sore loser, and that builds sympathy for Miller.

The write-in campaign would be challenging, having to spell M-U-R-K-O-W-S-K-I might be quite difficult for the Rethug voters of a state that elected Caribou Barbie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Not really
Edited on Wed Sep-08-10 08:23 AM by Toots
She is having discussions with the candidate for the Libertarian Party and he seems willing to give her his spot on the ballot if she promises to leave the Republican Party and become a real Libertarian..We know how Republicans are, they will promise anything to get Power and then do exactly what they want anyway..She is a proved LIAR, so her word is not really good on any issue. It is sounding though as if she will indeed be on the November ballot, running as a Libertarian. That could actually be even better for the Democrats. She will indeed receive a majority of Republican votes but Miller will get a whole bunch as well, which will split their vote and allow McAdams to pull this one out..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. It's an interesting gamble
but I expect Murkowski to take ONLY if she thinks she can win it, for sure. She won't do it just to spite Miller and let Adams walk into that seat, she'd forever be known as a spoiler, the way we think of Ralph Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chicago dyke Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. lol!
that's the funniest thing i've read all day. and you're not wrong! if she goes that route, i can't wait to see the ruling of how all the different spellings of her name will or will not be counted, heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liskddksil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. Polling shows McAdams doing better in a two way race
Lets hope she stays out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. The ONLY way that is at all possible is if many Republicans would otherwise vote for McAdams.
Otherwise having Murkowski in the mix can only split Republican votes and make McAdams position much stronger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC