Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S.: Newly revealed 'covert' Iran facility not nuclear

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 01:41 AM
Original message
U.S.: Newly revealed 'covert' Iran facility not nuclear
Source: Reuters via Harretz

U.S. backs Iran's insistence that site 'exposed' by Iranian dissident group alleging secret uranium enrichment was in fact not a nuclear facility.

By Reuters

The United States took a surprising stance on Friday supporting Iranian claims that it was not building a new secret uranium enrichment facility, after an Iranian opposition group exposed satellite imagery on Thursday allegedly proving the existence of a secret nuclear site some 120 kilometers from Tehran.

The Iranian dissident group said on Thursday the information came from a network of sources inside Iran affiliated with the exiled opposition group the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) and the People's Mujahideen Organization of Iran (PMOI).

Washington, which along with its European allies accuses Iran of trying to build nuclear bombs, said it had known about the facility for years and had no reason to believe it was nuclear.

Read more: http://www.haaretz.com/news/international/u-s-newly-revealed-covert-iran-facility-not-nuclear-1.313154



Here is the original accusation by terrorist organization The People's Mujahedeen of Iran:

Iran accused of building secret underground nuclear plant
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/7992723/Iran-accused-of-building-secret-underground-nuclear-plant.html

Also:
Iran denies 'secret atomic plant'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-11263827

I note that DUers didn't buy the original accusation.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4535269
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. What? A dissident group lying?

Nooooo, never!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. These are not dissidents -- they're a terrorist cult
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/mek.htm

The United States, which lists National Council of Resistance of Iran as a terrorist organization, closed the NCRI's Washington office in 2003. . . .

The group has targeted Iranian government officials and government facilities in Iran and abroad; during the 1970s, it attacked Americans in Iran. While the group says it does not intentionally target civilians, it has often risked civilian casualties. It routinely aims its attacks at government buildings in crowded cities.


http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2008/12/31/58809/cult-like-iranian-militant-group.html

The group was founded in the mid-1960s to oppose the Shah of Iran and western imperialism. It was instrumental in the November 1979 occupation of the U.S. embassy in Tehran, where 52 American hostages were held for more than a year. Ultimately, the group had an ideological split with Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who had become Iran's supreme leader after the Shah was ousted, and its new cause became overthrowing Iran's Islamic revolution.

The group is accused of orchestrating a series of bombings inside Iran, including one attack that left the current supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, partially paralyzed. The group is also linked to the assassination of U.S. military personnel in Iran in the 1970s and helping Saddam quash Kurdish and Shiite uprisings. . . .

Rajavi's followers live an almost monastic existence. They dress in khaki green. The women and men live separately, and sexual relationships are forbidden out of concern that they'll distract from the mission to overthrow the Iranian regime.

Residents have no access to the outside world. They rarely leave camp, and their television viewing is limited to an Iranian resistance TV channel that spoofs President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and plays orchestra performances by members of the group.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Ha! Nice one! It took me about 20 seconds to chew over that before I finally...
...recognized him. Damned good point!

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ineeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. I remember satellite imagery that proved Iraq
had weapons of mass destruction. Just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes, this seems familiar.
You'd think the neocons could come up with something new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. K & R
I smelled a rat the first time round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Obama just called that curveball low and outside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. No weapons of mass destruction
What a disappointment. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. This shows a huge difference between the Bush and Obama administrations.
I have no doubt the Dick Cheney would have used this terrorist group's "evidence" for nefarious purposes and the other little man would have spouted some idiocy like "I don't know what further proof we need!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC