Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boehner Claims Mandate to Nix Health Care Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:37 AM
Original message
Boehner Claims Mandate to Nix Health Care Bill
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 09:38 AM by sabra
Source: CBS News/AP

House Speaker-in-Waiting Says Election Proves Voters Want Health Care "Monstrosity" Rolled Back; Exit Polls Less Conclusive

(CBS/AP) House Republican Leader John Boehner on Wednesday claimed a voter mandate to roll back the Obama administration's health care overhaul, calling it a "monstrosity."

The presumptive next speaker of the House told reporters Wednesday morning the Republican takeover of the House and its success in narrowing the Democratic Senate majority was proof that "the Obama-Pelosi agenda" was rejected by the American people.

"I think that it's a mandate for Washington to reduce the size of government and continue our fight for smaller, less costly and more accountable government," Boehner said.

While the Ohio Republican spoke of popular opposition to the health care law, a CBS News exit poll found that voters were split on the issue, with nearly half calling for its repeal and a roughly equal number saying it should either be expanded or left as is.

"We have a big job ahead of us and that's why you'll see us roll up our sleeves and go to work today," Boehner said, adding that Republicans will take the next several months, before the new session begins in January, to map out their agenda.

Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/11/03/politics/main7018035.shtml?tag=cbsContentWrap;cbsContent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. That didn't take long.
With most of its provisions not taking effect until two years after Obama loses the next election, he will probably succeed in repealing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Not at all
While Democrats dithered for years about just why they were handed overwhelming majorities, the Republicans will ride a razor thin edge in one house of Congress to claim mandate after mandate, and bull ahead with their ruinous policies. They are not going to care what Democrats or the people think. This may be the only way in which I wish Democrats were more like Republicans, but it's a significant way.

When you get back into power, Democrats, remember that you're there for a reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. I figured Ds would have learned that the last time they were back in power.
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. The instructions are true
Welcome to Life 101. Here are your instructions:

1. As the course proceeds, certain lessons will be presented to be learned.

2. Lessons not learned will be presented again until mastered.

I think we're kind of stuck on number 2. We were doing pretty good while we had Howard Dean as party chairman. Maybe it's time to go back to that 50 state strategy, where them that has help out them that needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humblebum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
40. They had better come up with a viable good plan to replace it
within 2 years, otherwise they will be gone - is my prediction. The healthcare mandate was a priority issue that brought Obama into office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. This is 1989 all over again
Enough spineless Democrats will join with Republicans to override Obama's veto. The bill will be repealed and the blame can be laid right at the feet of a President who sold us out to PhRMA and the pimps who run the health insurance rackets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vduhr Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. Did you expect anything less?
Welcome to the great Democrat voter fuck up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Does BOH-ner think HCR = Single Payer?
Is he high on burnt umber? This bill is so corporate friendly, it's ridiculous. Speaking of deficits, I want to know where the revenue is going to come from for his plans to extend the still-not-paid-for Bewsh II tax cuts. Don't worry about HCR until you've solved THAT problem, Slappy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Thats the big question, for those who really DO care, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I think he's more of a raw sienna kind of guy
but what do I know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. A RUST-ic kind of fellow, if you will.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gtar100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. No, it's all politics for that asshole. It has nothing to do with truth.
If the healthcare bill would have been passed by republicans, word-for-word, he would have been praising it to no end.

As for paying for tax cuts - that's a non-compute for republicans. They don't think there's any consequence to them other than manna from heaven.

Modus operandi: anything bad that happens - blame the democrats.

BOH-ner is a nothing but a skilled repuke politician. Sincerity, integrity and acting as a representative of the people are the least of his concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. It helps out regular people along with some corporate interests
They want a health care bill that leaves out any help to the poor or middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
33. Insurers would be happy to roll the entire bill back (except for the mandates)
Almost all of the bill is unpleasant to them, because it forces them to provide care and limits their profits (via the medical cost ratio). The only thing they really like is the mandate to buy. They'll call on the GOP to help get rid of everything but that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
42. No -- his corporate sponsors understand the THREAT any modification of
PRIVATE health care is to Big Pharma and Health Care Industry ....

for them an inch is as good as a mile --!!

It's the DIRECTION they want to stop --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. Lets watch them 'map out their agenda' with their new little teabags.
Have fun, guys!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. See How Audacious Rethugs Can Be About Mandates?
And when it comes to Dems they are left fidgeting about what to do with winning an election. Aaaaaaah - I just cannot stand that anymore!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. reduce the size of government, but not of war spending
that will go up forever. And yet they want to balance the budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. I love how the "liberal" media allowed the right-wingnuts to equate the HCR w/Gov't Run Healthcare
when all it did was give PRIVATE insurance companies millions more in captive customers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
11. The funny part is that what was passed WAS the republican plan.
But since it was passed by Dems they are against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
36. +1

Indeed, what was passed was a republinazi wet dream.

Republinazi '93 plan:
"Subtitle F: Universal Coverage - Requires each citizen or lawful permanent resident to be covered under a qualified health plan or equivalent health care program by January 1, 2005."

"We will never have real reform until people's health stops being treated as a financial opportunity for corporations."


"Any proposal that sticks with our current dependence on for-profit private insurers ... will not be sustainable. And the new law will not get us to universal coverage ...." -- T.R. Reid, The Healing of America

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. How 'bout some Newt from 2008?
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 12:42 PM by Edweird
http://health.newamerica.net/blogposts/2008/reform_newt_gingrich_on_free_riders_and_the_individual_mandate-18127

"The reality of an individual mandate (when coupled with subsidies so that insurance is affordable and market reforms so that coverage is accessible), is that it would not only address the "free rider" problem, but also serve as a tool to enhance insurance market competition. When combined with market reforms and subsidies, the mandate would help move insurers away from a business model that relies on marketing and underwriting and towards a strategy that involves competing for customers based on performance and price. This is a good thing...and something those in favor of market competition could get behind."

When you consider that Newt's mandate was for people making $75,000 and up, his plan sounds less RW than the one we got. How sad is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. Hey John Boy, why not do an "opt out" for folks to choose?
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 10:38 AM by Zambero
Ask if seniors want to opt out of ending doughnut hole for prescription drugs.
Ask if insured individuals want to opt out of pre-existing condition protections
Ask if parents want to opt out of allowing their adult children to stay on their policies longer
Ask small businesses if they wish to opt out of tax credits for extending insurance benefits

As far as insurance mandates for folks who can afford it but prefer to milk the system via the emergency room route, let them also opt out with full understanding that conscientious citizens will pick up the tab for them, provided these generous taxpayers voluntarily "opt in" to provide this service. Who said freedom isn't free?!?

This is just a few "opts ins & outs" and there would be others, but let's get that big bad gov't Obamacare off people's backs -- they demand it y'know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iliyah Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Most wanted
the ecomony fixed not HRC, plus Obama will veto it if it passes the Senate. So therefore, no mention about the jobs, huh???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
15. Boehner needs to Opt Out of the tanning bed, or whatever orange goo he slathers on
what a weird man that one is...

oh, and they'll try to gut everything they can, but it won't go anywhere with the Senate in our hands, and a presidential veto!

they really didn't do THAT good last night... just here in FL, and a few other states did they take everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
19. A lot of progressives agree it was a bunk bill
I'm sure they will be happy about this development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
20. Does everyone else roll their eyes like me whenever a republican says "mandate?"
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 11:33 AM by Politicub
Good luck with that, Tangerine.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
florida08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
23. Big talk for a small mind
I have a map I'd like to show him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
24. Republicans promise an era of limited government
Source: Yahoo News

WASHINGTON – Emboldened by a commanding House majority and Senate gains, Republican leaders vowed Wednesday to deliver on their "golden opportunity" to roll back the size of government and President Barack Obama's signature health care law.

"Change course we will," said Ohio Rep. John Boehner, the speaker-in-waiting, describing Tuesday's midterm elections as a mandate to shrink the government. That echoed the unrelenting demand of tea party activists whose energy and votes helped to fuel the largest turnover in the House in more than 70 years.

The capital awoke — if it ever slept — to a new political order. With their lopsided win, Republicans are ushering in a new era of divided government and dethroning Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a prime target of their campaign.

Repealing the health care law, with its mandates and subsidies to extend health insurance to nearly all Americans, has been a Republican rallying cry for months but Obama, with his veto power, and the Democrats still in control of the Senate stand in the way. Several Republicans indicated their challenge to the law won't happen overnight when they take power. "I think it is important for us to lay the groundwork before we begin to repeal this monstrosity," Boehner said.


Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101103/ap_on_el_ge/us_election_rdp



Time to grab your barf bags. For strong stomachs only! :puke: The pictures are particularly revolting.

This is what the voters selected last night. They'd just as soon hand the 'pugs knives, to cut their own throats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Except, you know, if
You make a phone call, or drive somewhere or send an email, or smoke a joint, or do anything else besides, apparently, walking around with a firearm strapped to your leg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Last I heard Mitch McConnell was still minority leader. Am I missing something?
What's with the negative language in the "news" story.

"Dethroning" Nancy Pelosi? Nancy never had a throne. Does this mean Boehner is going to buy a throne and a crown for himself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. It means that a woman shouldn't hold a position of such power
We need to get to the root of what they are really saying. The obscene hatred of Nancy Pelosi is not what she has done it is what her gender is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Fucking liars. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PfcHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. We go thru this every couple of years and it always ends with repub fail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. And whopping corporatism!
"Mandate" bought and paid for...with American sacrifice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #24
32. Well, since there will be gridlock, govt won't be able to do much, except start more war$.
Since the corporate Dems and the GOP both love doing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #24
49. while at the same time collecting bigger salaries!
that saved money has to go somewhere, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guilded Lilly Donating Member (960 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
30. The only reason he would roll up his sleeves is to make
sure the self tanning oil covered evenly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
34. Boehner you are entitled to your opinion but not your own facts.
Health care was not on the ballot and you won a slim majority in 1/2 of ONE branch of government in a year when the party controlling the WH almost always loses seats. And you gained less seats back than your party lost in 2006 and 2008. So you got no mandate to do anything except to try and work with President Obama and the Democratic Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
35. So Boner, what do you have instead that's supposedly better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
38. Ask Boehner if it's okay to bar people for pre-existing conditions.
How about overturning the provision that lets young adults stay on their parents' insurance policy till age 26? Think Boehner will get a round of applause for that?

People, the 'cans won a majority in the House, not super powers. Any legislation still has to pass both houses and get past the veto pen. So stop acting as though Boehner's already got precisely what he wanted and Obama has been voted out of office. Write to newspapers, your elected representatives, and hang this round Boehner's neck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
39. How's he gonna do that with the Senate and President voting against him?
He can't even count on the Dems in red districts voting with the GOPers anymore, since most of them lost their seats Tuesday.

He still may get something through the House to repeal Health Care, but we all know there's no chance of their getting 60 votes in the Senate. Even if they did by some miracle, Obama would veto it.

So here we have a GOP leader FINALLY presenting a plan to do something, but its chance of ever going anywhere is a big zilch. The whole party is all talk and no action, even when they win a bit of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
41. Okay ... NOW will Dem Party call Democrats out to demonstrate for Medicare for All?
THAT'S WHERE THE MANDATE IS ....!!

Let's stop this rw propaganda!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
43. Jeesh! I thought two years ago the mandate was for health reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
44. Go for it dude
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
45. You'll nix nothing Orange Ceasar...Obama will veto
your bullshit.

Yes. Get to work further destroying the country. The likes of you are the reason it's in the mess it's in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devil_Fish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
46. Why is it that when dems win it's a call for bi-partisanship, but when repubs win it's a mandate?NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinymontgomery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
47. I know this won't be popular
take away all government health care, no part d, no buying those electric wheel chairs, no meds, no money for college and guess what dem senate, dem house, dem pres and bring it all back and we are in for a long time. Sometimes it takes pain to see what you did. This would affect me and my family but sometimes you have to use the shock doctrine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
48. The Republicans were not given a mandate; they were given a gift.
They will be wise to not interpret these election results as a mandate. They're already getting pretty arrogant today. Just wait til they introduce more tax breaks for the multi-millionaires, go after Social Security, etc. Their support will evaporate fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC