Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama surprised by political cost of health law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:35 PM
Original message
Obama surprised by political cost of health law
Source: MSNBC/AP

President Barack Obama says the political cost of overhauling the health care system turned out to be higher than he had expected. And he admits that he gets discouraged at times when dealing with the economy.

In an interview airing Sunday night on CBS' "60 Minutes," Obama said the health care system itself is huge and complicated and that changing it eluded previous presidents because it was so difficult.

"I made the decision to go ahead and do it, and it proved as costly politically as we expected — probably actually a little more costly than we expected, politically," he said.

Obama said he thought that he would find common ground with Republicans by advancing health care proposals that had been introduced by Republican administrations as well as potential presidential candidate Mitt Romney when he was governor of Massachusetts.



Read more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40059757/ns/politics-white_house/



I hope you learned Mr. President but I fear you may not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. AP and MSNBC? BIG FUCK YOU TO BOTH!
I wouldn't even post their fucked up propaganda!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Then you can watch the interview on 60 minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Yep.....use my two eyes and my ears, like I always do.......
not AP/MSNBC's take on it, that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. What did they get wrong? He did push a bill, which he himself
stated had over 200 Republican proposals in it, yet they let Democrats take the fall for a Republican bill. Very clever of them.

If he had pushed for real reform, provided competition for the corrupt, predatroy Insurance Corps, he had the public behind him. Instead he wanted the impossible, Republican support. Even though they got most of what they wanted in the bill, but never could have done it themselves as the left would have been screaming, it was brilliant strategy to let Democrats do it and then stand back and criticize. This was all obvious throughout the entire process. He told us to STFU. I don't know why he is surprised. This bill is highly unpopular with nearly have the American public. A program with a PO would have been wildly popular, and Republicans would not have been able to touch it.

We didn't need this article to understand any of this.

What we got was a bigger version of Ronmneycare which after three years has seen premiums sky-rocket and the mandatory part of the bill, difficult to enforce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
85. Wish you could rec individual posts
Cause Sabrina1 says it all succinctly - although I'd add that Obama never had any intention to attempt to implement any kind of national health system which he had sneeringly referred to as 'socialized medicine' during the Presidential campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celtic Raven Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
109. +1
Well said.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #22
127. Thanks for selling us out to Wall St, Mr. President.
Time and time again, Obama trades orchard after orchard away to the Republicans and he doesn't get a single rotted apple back in return. Yet he still goes on appeasing them and now it's going to get even worse. We see him buckling on the Bush Millionaires Tax Cut and the Cat Food Commission is going to gut Social Security and Medicare with Obama's bipartisan blessing.

I guess it's time for the Wu-Tang Clan to update their song C.R.E.A.M. and this time make it stand for Corporations Rule Everything Around Me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. I too hope he now sees them for what they are, and stops wasting time with them...
He has a lot of presidential tools he can use to make changes for the better - I hope he doesn't hesitate to use them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
133. He doesn't, and he won't.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama is naive or this is bullshit. Take your pick.
The health care system is big and complicated? Oh my.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
breadandwine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. We have to work with Republicans. We tried that for 2 years, it didn't work, so let's try it again.

We have to work with the Republicans since there are so many things they care about that we care about and they and us are all we've got. We just have an innocent difference of opinion so certainly they will come around to working together.

One of these years.


We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.
We have no choice but to work with the Republicans.


Blah blah blah.


"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."


--------- Einstein



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. The politics of
Edited on Sun Nov-07-10 07:43 PM by ProSense
getting stuff done is costly, but worth it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
125. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. So he might as well have gone for the promised public option
When you compromise with conservatives, and abandon those who voted for CHANGE, you gain neither the support nor the respect of the conservs, and simply wind up selling out your supporters.

Obamacare will be stripped of those parts that DID help people, and the parts that were simply a golden egg laid for the insurance companies will be preserved.

Better to have either won, or lost, on one's principles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. +1000
You got that right - the insurance industry will be the only winners in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. i agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillH76 Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. Indeed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Absolutely. A giveaway to insurance companies pleases only
insurance co. execs. and those politicians who benefit from their contributions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. Exactly. He was badly served by those he surrounded himself with
He should have asked for advice for Democrats, instead of people like Lindsey Graham.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
36. Yes, he should have magically converted Lieberman and Nelson.
Or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. He should have started negotiations at nationalizing all the insurance companie
And settled for a public option.

Or expanded medicare in reconcilliation.

He sold us out big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #42
62. That's not how bargaining works.
Edited on Sun Nov-07-10 10:11 PM by Unvanguard
If Nelson and Lieberman thought the status quo was better than a given proposal, they had the power to prevent that proposal from coming into being. It didn't matter where Obama started from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsPithy Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #62
76. That is such a load of fucking crap, I hardly know where to begin!
Obama didn't EVEN ASK any Dems to support the public option, because he had already given it away to the corporations!

If he had the guts to fight for HCR that would have actually helped people instead of the insurance companies he could have,

Threatened to veto a bill without the public option.

Threatened to find and then campaign for primary opponents.

Gathered sick Americans, those without insurance, in the Rose Garden and introduced Nelson and Lieberman to each one saying, "Senator Nelson, this is your constituent, tell her why you won't give her the choice or the cost savings of a public option," IN FRONT OF THE MEDIA CAMERAS!

Drag every intransigent Senator to a National Association of Free Clinics, free clinic in their state, along with the media, and make him or her shake the hand of each and every patient. Tell each and every patient, "This is the guy/gal who is preventing health care reform."

And now, Obama has the nerve to whine about the political cost!!!! What about the cost to Americans who will forever be fucking slaves to our insurance companies!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #76
83. Not to mention the cost of those who will die because they can not afford the insurance, and
If Obama had called for a rally for single payer in DC, he would have had a million people show up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #76
90. yes, obama is a terrible salesman and we paid the price
i have a funny feeling he was given a lot of bad advice by the people around him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #90
101. Like liitle Greasy Rahm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #101
114. yup...the rat bailed out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #76
97. You seem to have entirely ignored the point of my post.
The simple fact of the matter is that HCR needed sixty votes however you slice it, and neither "starting high" by making single-payer the initial proposal nor threatening veto of an excessively weak bill would have made getting sixty votes any easier. Unlike Obama and Reid, Nelson and Lieberman had weak incentives at best to compromise: they seemed perfectly willing to block health care reform forever if it came to that.

Maybe you don't remember, but by late 2009 health care reform was not winning any popularity contests, and, indeed, Nelson capitalized on his obstinacy in Nebraska. It was hardly an optimal circumstance in which to apply pressure. Nelson could have easily politically gotten away with an "independent" stance with the Republicans to kill health care reform if he found it too liberal, and Lieberman at that point didn't seem to care what Connecticut voters thought of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #76
111. That would have forced Nelson to dig in his heels even more
The Red Necks in Nebraska would have supported Nelson as Senator for Life if Obama did that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #76
112. That would have forced Nelson to dig in his heels even more
The Red Necks in Nebraska would have supported Nelson as Senator for Life if Obama did that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Croquist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #42
131. So how much do you think that nationalizing the insurance companies will cost?
Just wondering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #36
91. Why not? He magically converted Kucinich n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #91
96. Kucinich preferred more, not less.
So winning his vote was simply a matter of getting him to realize that his preference wasn't and wasn't about to be on the table.

The whole problem with the conservative Democrats in the Senate and the House is that many of them did prefer the status quo to a liberal bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #96
98. The bill is not liberal, period
It's a big poison ivy salad with a nice vinaigrette dressing on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #96
129. NO! Kucinich would have preferred neither more of what passed nor less, but
Edited on Tue Nov-09-10 09:03 AM by No Elephants
something very different.

Yet, Obama somehow twisted his arm to get him to vote for a lot of crap he hated. What arm-twisting did Pres. Obama even attempt with anyone who wanted to sell us out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #36
126. Or, he could have used reconciliation for a good bill. Btw, what. evidence do you have about how
hard he tried to "convert" ANYone? It is either extremely naive or totally disingenuous to keep claiming that a Democratic President and head of the Democratic Party has no control over a Democratic Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #126
128. You couldn't pass most of the provisions of health care reform with reconciliation.
Edited on Tue Nov-09-10 08:47 AM by Unvanguard
It had to survive a filibuster.

President Obama has close ties with the Senate leadership, but it is neither "naive" nor "totally disingenuous" to recognize that he does not control how each individual member votes. While he took mostly a hands-off approach to the battles in the Senate about the precise content of the health care bill, both Nelson and Lieberman were almost certainly under immense pressure from the caucus to fall in line, and greatly angered many other Senators by what they did. None of that made any difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonzono Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
50. Better to have fought and lost
Better to have fought and lost
than to have Bipartisanshat and "won"
But rejoice
for Bipartisanshat 2.0 is here.
A vast upgrade to Birpartisanshat 1.0.
2.0 fixes a few minor bugs and adds
powerful new features guaranteed to
deliver compromise and cooperation
from even our most obstinate rePubic partners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
53. Hilarious thing?
Edited on Sun Nov-07-10 09:42 PM by Chulanowa
His "base" would still be lynching him in effigy, because they would rather have absolutely fucking nothing than have something that doesn't perfectly meet their personal litmus tests. And since that goalpost is always shifting, Barack Obama will always only be 3/5 of a president to the locals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. yes. the base are to blame for all of Obama's problems.
:eyes: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. If you're going to put words in my mouth, you could at least use interesting ones
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #53
66. OH yeah
This reply is worthy of a signature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #53
95. Actually, I would have been perfectly happy with the public option he promised to fight for.
I'll get off your lawn now because I'd sure hate to be accused of lynching anyone in effigy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #53
130. Bull puckey--and you should not cheapen the term "lynching" that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
79. He said at one point
He was willing to risk his presidency on health care. Then he promply went to fighting for a mediocre bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
103. Why did he aim so low? Better to have aimed high and let the opposition have shot it down
and let the American people spew their wrath on that opposition. The passion and rage would have followed people right to the polls. As it stands now, meh and the polls proved it.

As it stands, except for a chosen few, the health care status of most Americans remains in the same (or even worse) than it was before.

As far as "Obamacare" is concerned, what is there to be optimistic about now or in 2012?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
104. Yes, and everyone here who cheers constantly for this health care law
as if it's the greatest possible thing that could ever have happened are cheering for the REPUBLICAN bills that Obama chose to push instead of the Democratic choices that would have given us a Public Options.

We ended up with this crap health care bill that gives us very expensive insurance policies we can't afford to use instead of health care.

It does nothing to lower costs. They even admitted that lower costs was not ever one of the objectives. They were merely going to 'slow down the rate at which costs increase.' Isn't that wonderful?

So insurance does not equal health care, and costs keep going up. We got the republican bill passed into law instead of the democratic proposals. But he made an effort to be Bipartisan, so that makes it all okay.

He can definitely spin this as a political victor even if it's not. It's only other people's lives. I'm sure he can find a small army of loyalists who will always insist that this was the ideal possible outcome regardless. It's health care Utopia! x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
124. What makes you think he did not win or lose based on his principles?
Some of us wanted him to win or lose based on populist and/or liberal principles. I doubt those are his principles, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. He paid too much for what he got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Actually,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Actually,
those links are non sequiturs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rury Donating Member (629 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. K&R ProSense!
+100 million
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
94. + squat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Indeed he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
45. HE paid?
WE ARE the ones who will pay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. That we will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. Perhaps if he'd have listened, he wouldn't be so surprised
I mean, it's not a big secret it was an unpopular bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Most likely if he would have listened,
we wouldn't have shit.....

and I for one prefer what we have....
and anyone intellectually honest would admit that they do too.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9508547
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. so I'm intellectually dishonest because I opposed this legislation?
Yeah, whatever. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flatulo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. Respectfully disagree...
We got Romneycare here in Mass a few years ago, and I have been forced to buy wildly expensive insurance that won't pay for a fucking single claim I make. Lipitor? Fuck you. Flector patch for back pain? Fuck you. MRI for my back? Fuck you. Epidural shots for crippling pain? Fuck you.

I feel like going down there and blowing my brains out on their front steps, but I'm sure they wouldn't even pay for the cleanup.

Making people buy a shitty product, under threat of force, is the absolute most perfect imaginable way to guarantee that that product is a piece of garbage.

Fuck them all. Next year they can come and burn me alive on national television. I am not paying this fucking extortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. "forced to buy wildly expensive insurance that won't pay for a fucking single claim I make." Yep -
now Romneycare goes nationwide. Heckuva job, Obama and "Democrats"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #29
46. The Sanders loophole
Edited on Sun Nov-07-10 09:30 PM by grahamhgreen
Sanders put a bunch of community health centers in the bill.

I dont know if they can help you. I hate this sh*tty bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
43. So, you admit we got sh*t, then? Because big insurance will take their mandated trillions
Buy off a bunch of republicans and defeat what pathetic reforms are in the bill.

It's already happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FedUp_Queer Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
86. That's a lie.
Sure, when pollsters asked people generically about the health bill, people were "against" it. However, when people asked about particular provisions (like banning preexisting conditions, no lifetime caps, etc.) people are were overwhelmingly for it. Incidentally, I think he didn't go far enough. The enthusiasm would have been there in the mid-terms, if he had just fought and lost on the public option, etc. As it is, as so many here have said, he didn't even try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #86
99. No, it's not a lie. You need look no further than DU
All Obama had to do was watch the blood bath that was the DU debate over the legislation. We lost many old and vernable DU'ers in that period. That's how intense the debate was.

There were many of us opposed to the legislation for exactly the reasons we're seeing today. It wasn't a secret, and all you had to do to realize that was stop by the DU forums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FedUp_Queer Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #99
132. Yes, it was a lie.
Now, let me say this. My beef with Obama is bound up in the bill. He didn't even fight for the public option, or medicare for all, so I agree in that regard. However, there are a few things in it that are good (I can't believe I'm "defending" it.) Do I like no preexisting conditions? Yes. No lifetime caps? Yes. Would a public option be better? Hell yes. Single payer? OH, hell yes. An end to insurance companies? Super, hell yes. This is not what that guy I responded to said. He merely said "people didn't like it." Well, people didn't know what was in it. When polled on some of the things in it, people did like those provisions. I'm sorry but asking people questions like "do you approve of disapprove of the health care bill" is like asking teabaggers if they think we should "return to constitutional government." In neither case do people actually know the constituent parts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #86
115. You're trying to sell half the sandwich
Which we won't even get. There were no cost controls built in, and we've seen via the Gulf Oil Disaster what kind of regulation the Insurance companies will be held to.

The forced consumers like me will have to starve to pay for insurance we won't be able to use.

Where is the miracle in that? Beyond the fact that a D President did it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. uh, gee, maybe if he'd advanced proposals that PEOPLE ACTUALLY WANT AND NEED
instead failed republican gifts to the insurance industry, there wouldn't have been such political fallout.

Well, at least you pleased your GOP bffs. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
hansberrym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. Will the president pretend to be surprised at the dollar cost as well?
The politics of HCR going forward are extremely unfortunate. Health care costs will continue to rise because the average age of the population is rising. This is inevitable, but who will get the blame?

Will the administration claim in 2 years that the cost of health insurance is lower than it would have been w/o HCR? That hand is already way overplayed. People are already sick of hearing "jobs created or saved" and the bailouts (of the rich) prevented a depression.


The House republicans would do well to put forth an effort to overturn HCR, let the Senate defeat repeal, then simply wait to 2014 when it will be plain as day that insuring 40 million more people, raising the bar on what an approved plan must cover, and removing the lifetime cap will raise costs. Also this would put "the party of no" tag back on the dems.


Lastly, what will happen to the youth vote that put Obama in office when they are forced to buy a premium plan that they can not easily afford, do not need, and is forced on them to reduce cost to government for covering the old. Will the republicans not see the advantage in offering younger voters plans tailored to their needs?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Insurance lobby won, we lost
The legislation has virtually no control over premiums beyond the most egregious increases. Those of us who have insurance through their employment get absolutely no relief. We are stuck with whatever our employers decide to provide as long as the policy meets the minimum requirements. We have no freedom to shop elsewhere. We are stuck staying in our networks. There is no freedom to seek treatment elsewhere.

The majority of people will see absolutely no benefit from this legislation. Everything negative that happens from the time it was signed into law on forward is being blamed as a consequence. Companies now see this as a easy out on canceling retiree coverage. Just blame ObamaCare.

Calling this mess ObamaCare is so wrong since he had so little input. There were virtually no demands on Congress hence they turned it into a big stinking pile of shit.

Take some time and investigate the systems in place in France, Japan, Germany, Switzerland and Taiwan. Not exactly all hotbeds of socialism. You will be sickened by the simplicity, broad coverage, choice, and peace of mind enjoyed by citizens of these countries as compared to the mish-mosh of coverage we have here.

The insurance lobby demanded the mandate to counter the ban on preexisting conditions. Even my wife thought the mandate was Obama's.

I wrote countless letters and faxes to my good Democratic Senators and President virtually begging them to not do what they did. The outcome could have been so much different had Democrats followed the Republican way of doing things; damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
116. Obama may not have wanted the mandate
But he met with the bigwigs before talking to us and agreed to it as a term in return for them not fighting him on this.

It was a stupid trade, and he does indeed own it. It IS "Obamacare" because he wasn't willing to take the populist side in this issue or any other. The only things he's done for us, he's done because he absolutely had to(unemployment extension was a must, or he would have reaped and even nastier public backlash, and it didn't even help everyone).

President Obama- of the Corps, for the Corps, by the Corps...and we're supposed to cheering him on too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. HE STILL..just don't get it..
He thinks the Repukes wlll cooperate..If he is still trying 6 months form now to get Repuke cooperation its over..He will be a 1 term President and we are screwed..So much for the change we can believe in..Democrats wont show up in 2012 either..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #24
119. Doesn't seem possible, does it?
"He thinks the Repukes will cooperate..."

No, I can't believe he's that stupid.

And the only other explanation is that he's really a front for THEIR policies.

A "good cop" to their "bad cop".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2critical Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. probably b/c PPACA sucked, as far as policy goes
and sucks as far as politics goes. Have not seen a change in our lives, few specific provisions we can point to that will. We need municipal health department, just like fire, police, and military. Only then can we get this beast under control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
30. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jonathan_seer Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #30
56. what does that mean
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
31. Sounds like he was trying to please Republican legislators, rather than US citizens.
Edited on Sun Nov-07-10 09:28 PM by glitch
Huge mistake, and we'll pay for that too.

Who would have thought that Democrats wouldn't be satisfied with healthcare proposed by Republicans every other year since Nixon. How bold of Obama to be the first Democrat to embrace it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
32. What the hell did he expect? It's just a giveaway to private health insurers.
Of course there's going to be political repercussions for something that is such a disaster for the public. He's incredibly naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
33. His discernment of the character of Republicans is lacking
and that is a huge problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
34. It was the CONSTANT capitulating to Republicans that did it NOTHING ELSE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
35. For the fallout this modest reform has received, we could have had something
worth fighting over (public option, public insurance, single-payer, any number of options). While I am thrilled children are covered without the pre-existing condition nonsense, among many other things, for the insanity that has ensued because of this, it would have been nice to have had something that helped everyone right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsPithy Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #35
78. Didn't you hear?
The insurance companies don't want to cover kids with preexisting conditions, even though it is now the law. Sooo, they stopped writing policies for ALL CHILDREN!!! How do you like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #78
113. I had heard about that in a few cases. Didn't know how widespread the practice is
Just one more reason we needed something that didn't run through the slimy insurance companies. But then, we knew that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
38. He basically admitted it was a Republican bill. He said
something like 'it wasn't too different from bills that had previously been suggested by Republicans.' He compared it to Romney Care.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Makes you wonder if we elected a Trojan Horse....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #38
61. He quite literally admitted it was a Republican bill:

"Obama said he thought that he would find common ground with Republicans by advancing health care proposals that had been introduced by Republican administrations as well as potential presidential candidate Mitt Romney when he was governor of Massachusetts."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. What a truly stupid admission. The right hate it anyway
because it came from him and the left know they were betrayed.

Lose-lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
39. How many hundreds of thousands of times did we tell him...
Mandating the purchase of crappy insurance from known scam artists is not HCR.

They will just take tye trillions and use the money to defeat any good that is in the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
41. Out. Of. Touch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
44. you'd have to be clueless
seriously
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #44
120. or this is what you actually wanted
neither is a very encouraging possibility
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
48. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
49. "...actually a little more costly than we expected, politically,"
....see, Mr. Prez....it doesn't matter what accomplishments you may have, it's how the pukes will describe those accomplishments within their corporate media echo-chamber that counts....

....you may walk on water or turn rocks into gold, but pukes will never cooperate and will always characterize your accomplishments as shit....they want you out, and have said as much....

....say what you need to say on TV, but consider a lesson from the Mighty Quinn of Illinois....he became governor against all odds because Chicago put him over the top....take care of your base, Mr. President, and your base will take care of you....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cherchez la Femme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #49
88. Alastair Sim?
Seriously? I was just watching a couple of his movies and one, The Ladykillers, where Alec Guinness channeled himself some Mr. Sim

Luv that actor!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
51. He made some poor choices..including those he chose to have around him as advisors...
I CANNOT BELIEVE HE IS STILL TAKING ABOUT FINDING COMMON GROUND WITH REPUKES!!! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. he taught at the UNIVERSTY OF CHICAGO, the center of RW Neo-liberal ideology.
He was brainwashed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #52
60. he lived in INDONESIA
He's clearly an Islamic terrorist!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #51
75. + a zillion
He's either utterly obtuse or he's in cahoots with the opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #75
102. My thoughts as well..and I cannot decide which is scarier.
Edited on Mon Nov-08-10 08:16 AM by BrklynLiberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
54. Obama suprised a bear sh*t in the woods!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
55. He is sadly more naive than I realized.
He still thinks that he's going to somehow sit down with the Republicans and sing Kumbaya.

Our party as a whole just doesn't get it, and I'm close to giving up on it.

Frankly, I think the new health care law is going to be so watered down and chiselled away by Repukes by the time the main provisions become law that it will be less than worthless. If we couldn't get a real reform in; something like what Nixon proposed, I'm beginning to think that it would have been best just to let the current system complete its death spiral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skepticscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
57. Can everyone please, PLEASE stop
referring to this as "health care reform"? It is health INSURANCE reform. The difference is not trivial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddogesq Donating Member (915 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #57
64. Well said. If it were real health-care reform, then...
Edited on Sun Nov-07-10 10:26 PM by maddogesq
I wouldn't have considered traveling the 25 miles from my home to Canada and becoming a citizen had I not recently been awarded disability and Medicare.

Oh and by the way, I DON'T want the gubmint out of my Medicare, thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
65. Clueless
absolutely clueless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #65
73. Utterly and completely
so much for 11th dimensional chess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
67. Well..."advancing proposals that had been introduced by Republican administrations...
...is part of why it was so politically costly you dope! The people who elected you did not WANT a Republican health care plan. If they did, they'd have elected a Republican!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #67
74. People have no sense of perspective
He was making a point about the bill to demonstrate why it's ridiculous for Republicans to have opposed it and now want to repeal it.

Every health care bill since Nixon's has included many of the same elements. The President's plan does include elements similar to the Mass plan, which was in large part written by a Democratic legislature.

Everyone is freaking out because the President said: "I made the decision to go ahead and do it, and it proved as costly politically as we expected — probably actually a little more costly than we expected, politically,"

They expected it to be costly. The unexpected part is that mostly everyone on the right wants it repealed.

That is not the nonsense implied by the article title: Obama surprised...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #74
117. And you missed the entire point
He sold us a Republican Healthcare Bill while pretending to fight for what we wanted.

The Republicans took one look at it, and said "No fucking way!! He didn't just give us everything we wanted and a cherry on top, did he??? He did?? Let's see how much further we can push this, and still get credit for fighting it!"

And people like you are still cheering it on...why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsPithy Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #67
82. Truer words were never spoken!!!
My hat is off to you, ProfessionalLeftist. My name is Pithy, but tonight you win the coveted Pithy Prize! Billions of words have been written about health care, but all that was needed were your two sentences!

"The people who elected you did not WANT a Republican health care plan. If they did, they'd have elected a Republican!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
68. When did politics become a confessional???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
69. Gomer says; Surprise. Surprise. Surprise.
Who'd a-thunk that politics would be more important to the GOP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
70. so he promotes a plan for and by the people who hate him, which is unlike what the
people who elected him wanted. Hmmm...catering to the people who loathe you while dismissing the people who supported you. How could that plan possibly fail? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
71. he doesn't get it - he threw us under the bus - medicare for all or last resort public option
he then did not step up to the plate or any of them to tell seniors the repubs were lying - they let the thing go over the break and the rethugs frame it as a bad thing - they did not take charge and he still DOES NOT GET IT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
72. If all Obama does in the next two years is protect HCR..I'll be satisfied. Also repealing DADT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
77. We seem to miss reality on this one.
I read posts saying "if he had just..." done this, or that, or held out for the public option, etc, etc. I think we need to hear this a few thousand times until it sinks in. He had to bend as far over as he did to get ANYTHING passed. This HCR did NOT pass with an extra vote to spare. It took everything he could do to get the lame ass dDemocrats in line to get this passed. President Obama was not just struggling with the Repukkkes and neocon-network on this...he was struggling with his own democrats to approve this.

From reading the posts on these threads, it seems like a number of us think he could have gotten more? He was damn lucky, and he worked damned hard to get what pathetic bill we got passed. It's a start. Just like with Social Security...it was a start when it passed. It didn't have the form it has today.

Jesus people....give the poor man a break. He's busting his balls trying to turn this f*cking ship around, and even our voices like "ed schultz, the mad hatter" "is losing confidence" in this President. What a pathetic, whining bunch of quitters. You think you could do better? Remember, this is NOT a dictatorship. It's not even close. He has to work things so he can get enough power to push them through.

I know the repukkkes are our worst enemy. I sometimes wonder about ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
80. It would have cost him a lot less if it would have had a medicare buy in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
81. There were a couple problems
Edited on Sun Nov-07-10 11:36 PM by mvd
I think Obama let it linger in the Congress for too long without applying pressure. The Senate Finance Committee bill always seemed to be the favored one, and I don't know why. When he finally did apply pressure, there wasn't much time to get a public option in or other things that should have been in to make this a good bill. Bush got almost anything he wanted passed. I find it hard to believe we couldn't get things like the popular public option in.

That said, I do appreciate the step it took to make government have a bigger role in health care. But it seems like a missed opportunity, and is flawed because the system remains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-10 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
84. The LCD effect
Edited on Sun Nov-07-10 11:47 PM by andym
When you end up getting the least common denominator (LCD) in your legislation no one is happy.

The GOP hate HCR because it expands government power over industry and promotes equality, in that it is an attempt to provide health care for everyone.

Liberals hate HCR because it does not expand government power enough (like single-payer would) and because it provides large for-profit corporate insurers with more customers.

However, the principle behind HCR of promoting equality and health care as something that every American should have is the real victory for the President and progressivism in the USA. Unfortunately, the specific implementation is mediocre at best. Real change will hopefully come at the state level first and then spread. Perhaps California will finally pass single-payer now that it has a Democratic governor who won't veto it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #84
87. Good point
We shouldn't forget that the states can also be pioneers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
89. when you negotiate always ask for more than what you need
the people around him gave him horrible advice. i hope to hell he will have better advisors in the coming months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
92. With no front-loaded benefits in the bill, WTF did he expect?
He knew the Repukes would lie about it, so why no facts on the ground for significant percentages of voters before the election? And no, don't bother with the bullshit list again--we've heard it all. If a hundred people are drowning, and a lifeboat comes for 10 of them, WTF do you expect the other 90 to do? Stand up and cheer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
93. Medicare for all.
That's not complicated. Parasitic insurance companies add no value to the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #93
123. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
100. He's going to be real surprised..
... in two years when he's besieged from all sides and his "base" could give two shits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
105. This is such bull - Americans are divided down the middle on HCR.
Obama needs to stand proud on this great achievement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
106. Is Obama stupid?
Edited on Mon Nov-08-10 10:47 AM by Democat
I like him, but sometimes I wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
107. "would find common ground w/Repukes by advancing health care proposals...introduced by Repukes"
JESUS H. FUCKING CHRIST!!


how naive can Obama be?!?!

I don't think he'll EVER get that all the Repukes want is for him to fail and fail badly. They'll drag him thru the mud and forget anything they ever did or proposed in the past even if it was word-for-word the same.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
108. The money sentance:
"Obama said he thought that he would find common ground with Republicans by advancing health care proposals that had been introduced by Republican administrations as well as potential presidential candidate Mitt Romney when he was governor of Massachusetts."

This proves what many of us on the left have known since the beginning of the health"care" reform process -- it was RW bullshit meant to enrich the insurance/pharma corporations.

Plain and simple.

If O had pushed for REAL reform and called us Medicare for all, I have no doubt he would not be in such hot water on this issue right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
110. A lot of things have surprised him
I supported him over Hil in the primary, but I think shw would have dealt better with the willful treason of the Repukes in congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
118. And it will become a nightmare after a 2012 GOP congress gets hold of it.
Once they control washington again, the health care bill will be butchered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
121. He is probably the most surprised president in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
122. That's because he was pissing on Progressives all along
while looking the other way trying to pander to the pukes and blue-dog assholes...

He's tone-deaf...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atypical Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
134. Kinda doomed to fail.
There were some nice things, like disallowing cutting people for pre-existing conditions, and letting kids stay on family policies longer.

But the "reform" did little for most people.

Everyone currently with private insurance is still getting screwed over by private insurance companies, and just about everyone without insurance still doesn't have it.

The people who benefited the most from the "reform" seems to me to be health insurance companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC