US Agency (NLRB) Challenges Corporate Facebook Sacking (protected activity)

[Omaha Steve]

Source: JakartaGlobe

New York. In what is seen as a ground-breaking case involving workers and social media, the US National Labor Relations Board has accused a company of illegally firing a worker after she criticized her supervisor on her Facebook page.

This is the first case in which the labor board has stepped in to argue that workers’ criticisms of their bosses or companies on a social networking site are generally a protected activity and that employers would be violating the law by punishing workers for such statements.

The board has filed a complaint against an ambulance service in Connecticut that fired an emergency medical technician, accusing her, among other things, of violating a policy that bars employees from depicting the company “in any way” on Facebook or other social media sites in which they post pictures of themselves.

Lafe Solomon, the board’s counsel, said: “This is a fairly straightforward case under the National Labor Relations Act — whether it takes place on Facebook or at the water cooler, it was employees talking jointly about working conditions, in this case about their supervisor, and they have a right to do that.”


Read more: http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/business/us-agency-challenges-corporate-facebook-sacking/405738

[ck4829]

1. Can you imagine if the government denied assistance or jobs to critics?

"You hate the federal government? No public sector job for you!"

K&R.

But yet the private sector does it and it's called "freedom".

[DBoon]

2. Yes I can imagine that

it was the sort of thing the Bush administration tried to do

[billlll]

3. indonesia reported it... will our MSM?

Thanks steve for great posts.

[8 track mind]

4. About time

I know people who have been affected by this. This should be covered by the first amendment. Note i said 'should'.....