Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joe Biden: 2014 Afghanistan Pullout Is 'Drop Dead Date'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 10:13 AM
Original message
Joe Biden: 2014 Afghanistan Pullout Is 'Drop Dead Date'
Edited on Fri Nov-19-10 10:34 AM by Stuart G
Source: AP , Huffington Post.

LISBON, Portugal -- President Barack Obama and NATO's 27 other leaders open a two-day summit Friday on keeping the Cold War alliance relevant - but the meeting is being overshadowed by the escalating war in Afghanistan, where the alliance is struggling to contain Taliban militants.

NATO officials say they expect unanimous support from the allies for Obama's plans for a new, expanded missile defense system in Europe that would be based on an existing shield meant to defend military units from attack. The U.S. already has a missile defense system based mainly in North America, and it is planning one for its European allies.

But Obama will face tough questions from U.S. allies on his exit strategy in Afghanistan. He will also meet with leaders of the European Union on Saturday to defend his preference for stimulus spending at a time when many European nations are enacting economic austerity measures.

On Friday morning, appearing on MSNBC's Morning Joe, Vice President Joe Biden described 2014 as the "drop dead date" for "transitioning" power to Afghan authorities.

The NATO leaders are expected on Saturday to endorse a plan by Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, to start handing over responsibility for security in some areas of Afghanistan to government forces in 2011. The plan is to end the alliance's combat role by 2014 if conditions on the ground allow, but to retain significant forces in the country after that to train and advise the Afghan army and police.





Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/19/afghanistan-2014-withdrawal-biden_n_785904.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dat the date, bro!
Fo' sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. I thought that was 2011.
Deadlines are only final for the dead, I suppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. There will be a lot more dead by 2014,then if we left in 2011
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
social_critic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. more what dead?
would you pls clarify for us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Women, kids, wedding guests,little troopies etc
Also a few new amerikan Gold Star Mothers will be created for Corporate Interests and Profit$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. 2011 was always where they would START to draw down the troops
Whether this is a real change will be seen next summer. Last year, the 2011 draw down was projected as very significant and a turning point. If that really is the case - this will be consistent with what was said then. Biden pointed out that they did follow the promised steps in Iraq. (That also is interesting as we still have a substantial number of people in Iraq.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Biden made that clear
on CNN last night.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Thanks for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I guess when we get to 2014, we'll find out what 2014 *really* meant.
But then someone else will be President and Obama's fluid definitions will have washed away, according to a much more final and definite timetable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Wht did you think 2011 meant?
If you thought it meant that the war was over and all the troops home - it did not come from any of the President's statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Guess I can hold my breath a little longer.
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. How can he say that, when he won't be around then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. ...
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. I am very disappointed because Obama said
Edited on Fri Nov-19-10 10:30 AM by Stuart G
, that we would begin pulling troops out in 2011.
Now it looks like that may not happen at all .
.Imagine the death and destruction by us staying an additional 3 years..(on all sides)
and then a large number of troops will be there a long time after that.
Very disappointed, and very sad..

There is not much more to say..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
36. Yep, just a whole bunch of lip service to get elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. What the hell is a drop dead date for transitioning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. Yeah, I don't see how a "drop dead date" is possible for this sort of thing.
The term is used for a date that, if not achieved, will result in the termination of the project. "Smithers, I need that report by Tuesday or you're fired", or "Our company needs to have that delivery in by January 1, or we lose the contract."

So, if we don't transition out by that date...what happens exactly? What makes it a Drop Dead Date? Do we fire the troops?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. "Smithers, pack your things and prepare to get the fuck out of my office!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. And if Obama isn't reelected?
Then it becomes the zombie war?

We. Are. Never. Leaving.

I get really tired of the goal posts being moved in an effort to "pacify" the masses.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Be voting Dennis. He understands how to get out: "You
get out."

You ask the military to come up with a plan to execute a withdraw in 6 months.

How do you get out? You get out. Unless we are really there for something else ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Same here...
I had always preferred Dennis.

It's amazing how such a smart guy has been so tarred and feathered by the media.

He upsets the apple cart and the powers that be don't like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
37. CIA needs the fields to fund their missions. Never ended is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. No it isn't . eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'll mark the day on my calendar.
Is that the same Joe who said that the stimulus was needed to avoid unemployment going above 8%.

:eyes:



:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. That was an administration goal - and it was true that without the
Edited on Fri Nov-19-10 11:17 AM by karynnj
stimulus the rate would have gone higher than 8% - and far higher than it did go.

Is there anyone who meets your approval other than Madame Secretary Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Oh, I like Joe very much.
He's just repeating the WH B.S., as it behooves all VPs.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. and SoSs - who were more hawkish on that than either the VP or POTUS????
Edited on Fri Nov-19-10 12:16 PM by karynnj
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. I forgot the Princess of Peace voted against going to war.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. And the "Chosen One" wasn't even in the US Senate.
So what?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Only people like you refer to him that way.
And it's ironic, considering Hillary was the presumptive frontrunner (i.e., "the chosen one") for quite awhile.

I'm waiting for the day when you don't present yourself as a major hypocrite. Obama can't do right by you no matter what, but an ideologically identical person like Hillary is some sort of gift from heaven.

For the record, I wouldn't even care if you thought Obama was the devil, as long as you'd admit you're still bitter about the primaries. Just be consistent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. You started it, my friend, by calling Hillary the "Peace Princess".
Tit for tat.

As for "hypocrisy", that's the left's middle name.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Because you've never used similar terms without provocation?
:rofl:

Most of your posts are love letters to Hillary disguised as slams against Obama. Don't act like you've never pulled that stunt before. Just own up to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. Even for Biden ...
... that is an extremely poor choice of words.

The content of what he's saying is a big disappointment too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
placton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
12. Joe - be lyin' n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. Not only a poor choice of words (unfortunately, one of Joe's specialties)
but I'll bet this date is every bit as firm as the 1 year to close the detention center in Guantanamo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Because of the uncertainty of decisions like the above,,,That is why
I am so sad today.
Sure, 2014, ..way off in the distance..sure.......???But conditions can change..and we may be there, in a supporting role..or even combat role,
forever..

What if there is a Tet like offensive next summer???Could happen??then what???
What makes Obama and his team think they could do, what so many others.. couldn't do?

Is this nation bulding where there is no nation?
or fighting an enemy that knows no boundries..??..and
How can we win the hearts and minds of the people, the Afghan people when we kill so many? by mistake?? that is what war is..

So Obama draws down a few thousand troops...then what?? You tell me..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
32. *yawn*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
38. Yeah, it's the drop-dead date NOW
wait 'til 2014, then the drop-dead date will move out a few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC