Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Belmont man seeks Arizona-like immigration law in Ca.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 12:29 AM
Original message
Belmont man seeks Arizona-like immigration law in Ca.
Source: San Francisco Chronicle

(11-23) 17:23 PST Sacramento -- California voters may get a chance to weigh in on a proposal similar to Arizona's controversial immigration law, after the Secretary of State gave the go-ahead to a Belmont man to collect signatures for a proposed ballot initiative.

The proposal would require state law enforcement officials to investigate a person's immigration status if they are "reasonably suspicious" the person is in the country illegally, and would also make it a state crime for undocumented immigrants to "seek work while concealing their immigration status." It would also make it a crime, under state law, for employers to hire an illegal immigrant either intentionally or unknowingly.

The measure's sponsor, Michael Erickson, must collect the signatures of 433,971 registered California voters by April 21 to get the initiative on a 2012 ballot.

Erickson, a Belmont Tea Party activist, said he and the group of people that drafted the proposed law are concerned that with the passage of Arizona's SB1070 - which makes it a state crime to lack immigration documents - "illegal immigrant gangs, drug traffickers" and other criminal elements will relocate to California. The group also has a "long standing moral opposition to illegal immigration," Erickson said.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/11/23/BAPL1GGM7F.DTL



Proposition 187 was overturned in court. So was Arizona SB 1070. A poll by the LA Times revealed that SB 1070 had 50% support, 43% opposition among registered voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. One to vote against
oy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. lol!
I wonder how big his "group" is. Belmont is about as big as a hangnail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC