Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HIV Prevention Pill A Big Development In Communities Of Color

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 10:28 PM
Original message
HIV Prevention Pill A Big Development In Communities Of Color
Source: NPR

A new study by the National Institutes of Health suggests that a pill, known as Truvada, may be able to prevent HIV infection for gay and bisexual men. Host Allison Keyes talks with Dr. Jonathan Mermin of the Centers for Disease Control and Adolph Falcon of the National Alliance for Hispanic Health about the drug and what it could mean for communities of color which are disproportionately impacted by HIV/AIDS in the US. ...

.Dr. MERMIN::Well, the results from the study do represent a major advance. It's the first firm evidence we have that taking a drug can prevent people from getting HIV. In this case, reducing risk by 44 percent. And this is particularly welcome news since the study enrolled participants from one of the hardest hit groups: gay and bisexual men, among whom half of new HIV infections in the U.S. are occurring.

Mr. ADOLPH FALCON (National Alliance for Hispanic Health): Well, I think one of the concerns is calling this the prevention pill might lead people to believe that there is something out there that is a cure. A prevention pill is really a misnomer for this. This is a prevention sometimes pill. You know, the study found that it worked about half the time. That's not a great number, you know...

And people in the Latino and African-American community are much more at risk for HIV than the rest of the population, are they not? ... Mr. FALCON: That's true.

Read more: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=131570706



White's are exempt from HIV u'know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Probably should be provided free to sex workers and porno actors.
It's just common sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Porn studios have incredibly stringent testing standards.
And someone who has unprotected sex with an untested person can and will be blacklisted from ever working in porn again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. HIV tests are often ineffective for the first 6 months after exposure/infection.
It's a very complicated mess if you have multiple partners and don't know for sure who infected you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Which is why the rules for testing are so strict.
To work in porn, a person has to have a lot of clean tests going back to I believe a year or so, as well as not having had unprotected sex within that period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creative Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Free...? Well, I surely will not stand in your way.
You are free to give away as many of these pills as you can afford to give.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Creative Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. In case you haven't heard, the government is out of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Oh, and we don't worship Ayn Rand here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creative Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Actually, I don't worship anyone...
However, I am open to wide range of ideas and realize that no one political philosophy or economic system has all the answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Why is passing out this pill superior to providing condoms?
This drug seems to be an answer in need of a problem. Condoms are very effective in preventing HIV, much more so than a 44% chance from a pill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R -- back later to read I hope!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. A prevention sometimes pill???
How in the world do they plan to prove that it works? They won't, but they will fudge the trials and results like they did with statins and every other big money maker drug on the market, and they'll spend a fortune on advertising not to mention buying up the legislators. These creeps are the masters of deception, they prey upon peoples fears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Okay... what's the point?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but a condom is five nines effective, compared to 44%? Those aren't good odds for the pill. If it's for "the condom broke" situations, okay, but that's not how they seem to be selling this. And I can't imagine someone who refuses to use a condom being willing to get a special prescription drug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. at $30 a pop i'm sure it's gonna fly off the shelves....
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomThom Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. does it not work on heterosexual people, women, bisexual?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The article never says it does- so we should ass/u/me it won't- it's on NPR, after all.
the pinnacle of journalistic excellence as everyone knows!

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomThom Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I just thought it was odd that they would single out certain people
like they are the only ones that get HIV. I would think it works the same on all people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Sorry, i was being a little snarky there... (i loathe NPR) of course it would work on all humans.
in their effort to be "sensitive" they overlooked that little fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomThom Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. snark for snark
I thought so too from the beginning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
12. As I said in another thread
how does this not encourage the spread of HIV by encouraging unprotected sex?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I don't think anyone is going to take it anyway
Twenty year olds are not going to adhere to a daily regimen of an anti-viral drug for a disease they don't yet have.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC