Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dianne Feinstein moves to end ethanol subsidy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:12 PM
Original message
Dianne Feinstein moves to end ethanol subsidy
Source: San Francisco Chronicle

Sen. Dianne Feinstein is taking on the Farm Belt with a letter to both Senate majority leader Harry Reid and GOP leader Mitch McConnell to end ethanol subsidies, and she's getting some interesting friends on board.

Feinstein called the 54 cents-per-gallon tariff on cheap ethanol imports (read Brazil) and the 45 cents-per-gallon direct subsidy for blending ethanol with gasoline "fiscally irresponsible and environmentally unwise."

The subsidy has been blamed for fueling a giant algae bloom the size of New Jersey in the Gulf of Mexico. Economists say ethanol stands little chance of helping the U.S. achieve energy independence.

Feinstein cites a Congressional Budget Office study this year finding that the ethanol credits cost taxpayers $1.78 for each gallon of reduction in gasoline consumption.

An interesting bipartisan collection of 16 other Senators signed the letter, ranging from conservative Republican Tom Coburn (OK) to liberal Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse (RI), along with California colleague Barbara Boxer.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=78015&tsp=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. hmmm - interesting. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. As a rural midwesterner surrounded by cornfields,
I gotta say that this is one of the few moves DiFi has made lately of which I approve.

The corn subsidy is nuts.

For starters, you know what it takes to grow corn?
Fertilizers made from fossil fuels.
Pesticides made from fossil fuels
Big fuckin tractors & corn harvesters & trucks that run on…you guessed it.

And to make corn mash into usable ethanol, you need a big fucken still.
Stills separate the alcohol from the rest of the mash by evaporation under heat.
Guess what they use for heat. Generally, propane.

For the most part, corn is just another fossil fuel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. "For the most part, corn is just another fossil fuel."
What does that make beans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Are beans getting subsidized by tax dollars to be converted to fuel?
I need my burrito subsidy for fuel conversion!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Most big commercial food crops are largely fossil fuels.
Beans (e.g. soy beans) could easily have all the same problems if they are cultivated for fuel.

Also, using potential food crops for fuel drives up food prices on a global level, which is not good at all for developing countries.

If you stop to think about it, almost everything you get at McDonalds is corn, with some wheat & potatoes. The corn-fed beef, the HFCS in the soft drinks & syrups, the oil in which the FFs are fried--all corn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. It was just a joke
sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. While I agree with you on the subsidies, the argument is wrong.
Corn grown for fuel doesn't require either fertilizers or pesticides. I should know--I live constantly surrounded by "feed corn" grown for cows, which is never fertilized except by plowing raw cow manure into the ground in the sping, and never tended by the farmers that grow it.

Corn subsidies should be stopped because corn is not the best crop as far as energy density goes, and because they distort the cost effectiveness of the technology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Travelman Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Agreed on both counts.
Corn is a NASTY crop, as it is farmed right now. But it doesn't HAVE to be. And it's definitely not the best bet for energy density.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yay for sanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Excellent...
It is about time.

Ethanol subsidies have been a terrible idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Glad to hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Great
Now we will see if tea baggers, Koch and ADM are serious or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Second Stone Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Guess DiFi wil never run for President now
Yay! I think this is probably a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groundloop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good. Take those $$$$ and use it for actual green energy research
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. Corn-based ethanol is fine for use on farms that grow corn. Otherwise,
it doesn't make much sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IScreamSundays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. That's right!!
Corn Austerity Bitchez!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. She needs to do some research into the grain marketing and farming
industry before she calls for this type of legislation..This would have an affect on grain prices and probably reduce marketable grain to one half of what it is now..MY advice for Feinstein... just STFU
No ethanol, less demand, lower prices...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. Good.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
19. CORN is good for fueling...... PIGS.... and the occasional BBQ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. ain't gonna happen
too much power in the hands of rural senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. CATO (yes them) - Archer Daniels Midland obscene costs per $1 of profit
September 26, 1995

The Archer Daniels Midland Corporation (ADM) has been the most prominent recipient of corporate welfare in recent U.S. history. ADM and its chairman Dwayne Andreas have lavishly fertilized both political parties with millions of dollars in handouts and in return have reaped billion-dollar windfalls from taxpayers and consumers. Thanks to federal protection of the domestic sugar industry, ethanol subsidies, subsidized grain exports, and various other programs, ADM has cost the American economy billions of dollars since 1980 and has indirectly cost Americans tens of billions of dollars in higher prices and higher taxes over that same period. At least 43 percent of ADM's annual profits are from products heavily subsidized or protected by the American government. Moreover, every $1 of profits earned by ADM's corn sweetener operation costs consumers $10, and every $1 of profits earned by its ethanol operation costs taxpayers $30

http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-241.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyr330 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. For once I agree with that nitwit
I am not one of Feinstein's fans, but for once, I DO agree with her!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC