Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Hits Back At Liberal Critics of Bill Daley

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 11:33 AM
Original message
White House Hits Back At Liberal Critics of Bill Daley
Source: CBS News

It's not hard to understand why liberals are confused and angry over the choice of Bill Daley to be White House Chief of Staff. The President Obama they know and love spent the last two years bashing Wall Street executives, calling them "fat cats" and lecturing them for their "greedy" ways.

Now, in a turn of events that has the left wing aghast, one of those fat cats will soon be setting policy at the White House. Daley, after all, spent 7 years at JP Morgan where he's believed to have earned at least $5 million a year, possibly much more. He's one of them, liberals cry, not one of us.

...

But in an interview in his large corner office in the West Wing, outgoing press secretary Robert Gibbs pushed back against the conventional wisdom that the president is suddenly moving to the political center, setting himself up for a re-election campaign that's focused on moderate voters, leaving liberals out in the cold.

The president, Gibbs said, "knows what his values are." During the health care debate, for example, some senior advisors argued for dramatically stripping it down, or even putting it off until after the economy recovered. Gibbs says the president listened - and then ignored their advice.

...

But why bring in a Bill Daley if Mr. Obama isn't signaling a change in direction? Gibbs responded that liberals Robert Reich and Howard Dean support Daley. What the president gets in Bill Daley, he argued, is not a point of view, but someone with vast management experience in government and business, and someone respected on both sides of the aisle, essential in this new world of divided government. And, as the president said, Daley knows how to create jobs, the president's number one priority for the next two years.

Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20027758-503544.html?tag=stack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R...Daley is a good choice, I support his decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. Why would you support a banker,
the scoundrels that brought down our financial world, as the presidents chief of staff????

Truly, I'm curious as I see nothing at all good about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. The president "knows what his values are"
The values of Wall Street, Big Oil, Big Pharma, the MIC, health insurance execs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. "White House Hits Back At Liberal Critics"
I hate it when a headline doesn't allow me to differentiate between which day of the week it is. Hell with the frequency of that headline it's getting tough to even tell which month or year it is when I read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. We rarely read..."White House Hits Back At Republican Critics"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. bingo nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. We'll see that headline when hell freezes over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. I second that emotion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
33. Yup...
..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
45. We rarely read..."White House oofers compromise with liberal critics"
don't I wish he found us significant enough to "triangulate"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. How can he be "respected on both sides of the aisle" unless...
he caves in to the Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
35. True
The Repukes laugh at him, we disdain his appeasement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. I like the Daleys, but if Obama thinks he can dispense with liberal support,
fine, go ahead and do that. There are other things we can do, other candidates we can support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. some one whose best advise was 'quit' when the going got tough. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. Why would he hire a professional influence peddler?
It seems to me the most straightforward reason is that he plans to peddle influence.

In other words, more of the same, business as usual.

In case there was any confusion, it's not us who get peddled to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. Obama lost votes because he moved too far to the center-right so ....
...what does he do?

MOVE FURTHER TO THE CENTER-RIGHT.

Excuse me but I thought this man was intelligent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. Obama would have to be possessed by Karl Marx to move back toward the center from the right wing
he has settled so comfortably into.

Just another in the too-long list of sell-outs to those who really run Amerika.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. OF course they did..the "Bad Liberals" are the only ones that the WH admonishes
for anything.
Keep it up Obama...you might just piss all of us off before you are through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. "Daley knows how to create jobs" - yes, in China, India, Bangladesh,
Malaysia, Thailand, etc., etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. And, as the president said, Daley knows how to create jobs....
.... in other countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savalez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. Looks like the press is trying to divide the democratic party again. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. it's not the press, it's the pres.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
36. the press didn't hire Mr. Nafta for a position in the WH
of course, we already know who did THAT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
38. You mean the press secretary, Gibbs?
Is the press not supposed to report what the President's press secretary says publicly, on the record?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boxerfan Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. Liberal critics under the bus again-suprise suprise suprise
Oh yeah-he's gonna get all chessy on them just you wait!!!
Sorry but not buying it-by actions he is no moderate or liberal-he is a corporate fascist-the good cop one.
(sarc)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. "The president, Gibbs said, 'knows what his values are.'"
So do we. That's the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. Shaddap, stoopid libruls. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. FTWW........................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. CBS says "bash", I say "mildly scold".
"The President Obama they know and love spent the last two years bashing Wall Street executives, calling them "fat cats" and lecturing them for their "greedy" ways."

the premise of this article is MSM beltway full-on center-right bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
40. Yes--coming straight from Gibbs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
49. And gave them what they wanted regardless of what he called them n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. 'that the president is suddenly moving to the political center,'?
"that the president is suddenly moving to the political center," Huh? The president STARTED in the center has has moved steadily and undeniably to the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. If the President hadn't continually appointed people like..
Emanuel, Geithner, and Summers, I might buy the "administrative" excuse more. But it is a trend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
27. Yes he "knows what his values are." I know mine,
and the gulf is getting wider and wider between our individual values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
28. There's zero hitting back at anyone in that article
Edited on Fri Jan-07-11 12:44 PM by ProSense
The headline says one thing and then supports it with the WH's justification for hiring Daley.

Typical MSM tactic: attempt to marginalize liberals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kall Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
30. LOL
Yeah, thank God his health care bill wasn't dramatically stripped down or anything. And doesn't the "We'll Fix It Later" slogan for health care imply you're putting off really addressing the problems? I guess they figured fixing the problems would be more easily accomplished with a Republican House stating they'll be starving it of funding and uniformally united in opposition.

Anyways, we know what this President's values are too. He's amply demonstrated them for 2+ years, and they're bankrupt. I'm sure the fact that Gibbs said in one breath that Daley is being hired not for his policy views but his management skills, then argued in the next breath that he "knows how to create jobs" just escaped his notice entirely - tends to happen with mealy-mouthed press secretaries. As NAFTA demonstrated, he knows how to create jobs, just not in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. well, it's not like they kept us in Iraq and Afghanistan, let Bush's criminals go, shielded BP
Edited on Fri Jan-07-11 07:46 PM by MisterP
from photographers, made sure people keep getting thrown out of their houses, sell our jobs abroad, sell off our public education to hedge funds, express a desire to abolish Social Security, and tried to enslave us to vampiric insurers, and then scream that we should beg for forgiveness because all of those things never happened and we just want our pony after only 1 year only 2 years only 3 years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
31. Must Liberals line up for more punishment?
Just wondering if we're supposed to go to Washington for more ass-kicking by the White House, or will local reps come to our houses and smack us around as needed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
32. In a two party system comprised of
two right wing parties, who cares if liberals vote or for whom they vote? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
34. Still waiting for them to hit back at McTurtle
Starting to turn blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
41. Bullet. Foot.
Edited on Fri Jan-07-11 07:38 PM by No Elephants
Meanwhile, Rethugs have been all over TV saying Obama's is THE most corrupt administration in history. Gibbs have anything to say about that?

Rethugs also saying Obama's is the most "hard left" administration since FDR (which made LBJ/Humphrey roll over in their respective graves in unison, probably FDR and all the Kennedy brothers, too).

On both counts, LIARS!

ETA: How many times have Republicons chided and/or cursed at their base?

Way to---whatever is the opposite of "fire up the base."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
42. "For what would it profit a president to gain a bankster and lose his base?" - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #42
46. uh... millions? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
43. P.S. Don't know about Reich, but I saw Dean interviewed on Daley. Support is way
too strong a word.

Does the expression "damning with faint praise" ring a bell? Plus, Dean looked so uncomfortable, it made me sad for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
44. Obama "bashed" Wall Street mildly maybe.
But he sucked up to them almost from the very beginning, by putting the fat cats in positions in his government. He is a corporatist first and foremost so this appointment only confirms that we should not have elected this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
western mass Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
47. Dear Liberals: He's just not into you
"but he loves us! he'll change!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
48. If Daley and all his overpaid fuckbuddies knew jackshit about creating jobs
--then why are we on track to have 15 years of near zero net job growth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IScreamSundays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
50. Do you fugging get it??????
You are owned!!!

The President's chief of staff just cruised over from JP Morgan. Obama is a good looking well spoken puppet.

A puppet for the TBTFs.

The sh#t is hitting the fan, the fan is on high.

For reals, I recommend reading zerohedge on a daily basis.

You can't vote the stench out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luciferous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
51. The guy who implemented NAFTA is put in charge of job creation?
This administration gets worse and worse every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icnorth Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Daley is well educated to smooth out
the bumps for the administration in their "symbolic" battle with Congress and its agenda of legislated corporatocracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 20th 2025, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC