|
Edited on Mon Jan-10-11 01:17 AM by jtuck004
and how that infrastructure they pay for helps business.
On the other hand, when 30 million people lose their jobs or can't work enough hours to make ends meet, and 1 out of 3 workers are making $20K/yr or less, there is little wisdom in trying to prop up a structure that was built on much higher returns.
Take someone who was paying $1800 a year out of their $60K job (.03). They lose their job and get a $17K a year job at Dollar General, and now their taxes are $893 (.0525). They have lost 2/3 of their income, can barely (or not) make a house payment, the money they used to pay in for public services is halved, 50 million now have no health care, and they can't buy nearly what they used to - yet their taxes have only decreased by half, and now the bite hurts A LOT more.
It is incredibly short-sighted for a state to increase income taxes to try and prop up their existing structure. There is nothing to support an increase in jobs and demand at the level we would need to see 5% unemployment in anything less than 20 years - that's 2031! And that's with relatively lower wage service sector and home health care jobs). The most likely scenario is that living standards continue to deteriorate, food becomes more expensive and harder to get, gas gets pricier, or maybe the pension fund problem rears its ugly head. So the states are going to find themselves short again in just a few years, and with a population that is getting a little perturbed. That could be sooner than anyone thinks if housing takes the second tumble that might be coming about mid-2011. And that carries with it all sorts of potential changes, potentially a series of landslide victories for people who will cut the heart out of public employment, and potentially make changes that affect the plans people have been living towards for decades.
Businesses aren't stupid. They may be sitting on a couple trillion dollars, and although it might be patriotic and good for their long-term survival, they see it as foolish to use it to create jobs in this economy. It would just flow to China until they had no more money. Check out IPO's for new companies - China raised 50% more capital than we did last year in new IPO's. Business is investing overseas, and making much more money than here. China is even outsourcing work they used to do to Vietnam and other countries.
What we desperately need is DEMAND, and potentiall a stiff, perhaps temporary, cut in expenditures, which probably means military and very likely cuts in wages or personnel in public jobs, dropping the health insurance industry and moving everyone to medicare. (I find it ironic to hear public employees calling for cuts in the military - that means those people would be fired - and yet arguing against cuts in state and federal civilian jobs). We have lived on debt that masked the decrease in good jobs for the past 40 years, have lost the pool that used to fund all this, and have no money to buy sufficient quantities of "stuff" to energize the economy.
The federal government, the ones who manufacture the money, then needs to be injecting funds in a massive way - ala WPA/CCC, updated for this century - employ about 15 million people at $30K year, and set people to work on 21st century projects. At the same time we need to increase taxes on the wealthy. Unfortunately, partly due to hundreds upon hundreds of millions of dollars spent on campaigns, lobbying, and jobs in the government being taken by former and soon-to-be employees of the investment banks, Wall Street controls the purse strings and policies, and so far they seem reluctant to be anything but their typical avaricious selves. And until enough people get the guts to walk away from all that and stand up against them, they will continue to control it.
Doesn't bode well for the future.
Thank you for the comment.
|