|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
harvey007
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 08:39 AM Original message |
Accused gunman had no party affiliation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfranklin
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
1. A Libertarian....in other words... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 08:47 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 08:48 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. AZ has a Libertarian Party he could have joined: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xipe Totec
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 08:51 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Might as well join the procrastinator's club nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FarLeftFist
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:38 AM Response to Reply #8 |
31. ALL we heard from Teabaggers is that they are "Independents" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raouldukelives
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:31 AM Response to Reply #31 |
39. Couldn't find a teabagger that would admit voting for Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:06 PM Response to Reply #39 |
76. Would YOU admit voting for Bush if you'd have done it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 08:45 AM Response to Original message |
2. He may not be registered to a political party but he had a political agenda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 09:07 AM Response to Reply #2 |
10. his agenda appears to have been dictated by his apparent psychosis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melm00se
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:21 AM Response to Reply #2 |
26. fact based evidence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 08:00 PM Response to Reply #26 |
86. I think you can agree that JL specifically attended a political event, to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 03:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
62. A political agenda is not the same as a partisan agenda. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 08:03 PM Response to Reply #62 |
87. I'll stay with my thoughts on that. Political agenda is different and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
3. Being registered independent means squat. I was registered "unenrolled" until |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigworld
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
4. Look at how the handwriting and signatures changed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melm00se
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:27 AM Response to Reply #4 |
27. good catch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:32 AM Response to Reply #4 |
30. Yes, excellent observation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 12:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
48. 18 and then the next few years are, I have heard, the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
7. Apparently he lacked both political and religious affiliations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 08:58 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. "He still could have been susceptible to angry rhetoric that made sense to him." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 09:08 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. and he could have been susceptible to hidden messages in "The Phantom Tollbooth" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
12. "Independent" is a pretentious euphemism for far right wing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigworld
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 09:16 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Not necessarily |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChazII
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:03 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Thanks for your common sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tpsbmam
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:49 AM Response to Reply #13 |
34. And I know many who've registered Independent due to disgust with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rebubula
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 09:16 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 12:31 PM Response to Reply #14 |
49. A paranoid person is quite likely to avoid affiliating himself in writng |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 01:09 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. He went to the event to kill Giffords who is a Democrat. Whether her party affiliation mattered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 04:07 PM Response to Reply #51 |
64. If it did not matter, he was definitely not a liberal or a Democrat, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
24601
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 07:14 PM Response to Reply #49 |
84. Yes, a blue-dog Democrat who voted against Nancy Pelosi for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zappaman
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 05:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
66. +1000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 09:30 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. You need to talk to the people of New England |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wizard
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 09:32 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Ask "Independents" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:22 AM Response to Reply #12 |
36. That is only one thing that it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:50 AM Response to Reply #12 |
40. Exactly. Spend any time listening to liberal talk radio, and you'd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 01:12 PM Response to Reply #40 |
52. Those on the left very rarely describe themselves as "independent". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kali
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 12:00 PM Response to Reply #12 |
41. oh bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 03:58 PM Response to Reply #12 |
63. Bullshit. Plently of leftwingers are sick of partisan democratic party politics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sadbear
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
15. This isn't even an issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Veronica.Franco
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
18. This image states he was registered Republican ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigworld
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:31 AM Response to Reply #18 |
29. This is likely a fake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kali
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 12:04 PM Response to Reply #29 |
42. county recorder said he was independent first registered on 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mommalegga
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 06:30 PM Response to Reply #42 |
67. You mean this supposed right wing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 06:48 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. So is it "Hell who's to say", or is it "The man is insane. Nuff said." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mommalegga
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 08:17 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. Both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:11 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetloukillbot
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 01:06 PM Response to Reply #18 |
50. I can't get that to open, but is it the one where "Tucson" is spelled wrong? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amb123
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
19. This "story" is a failed attempt to blame the Tucson Shootings on Democrats/Liberals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 12:06 PM Response to Reply #19 |
43. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
21. Party affiliation is not the issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rozlee
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
22. Misspelled "Independent?" Sounds like a teabagger to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:14 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. 22 years old, mentally ill, and dropped out of school |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 02:10 PM Response to Reply #24 |
57. yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 01:12 PM Response to Reply #22 |
53. have you failed to notice how many misspellings appear on DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 04:25 PM Response to Reply #22 |
65. If bad spelling is a sign of teabaggerism then this place is Tea Central. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kweli4Real
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
23. Don't most teapartiers/teaparty sympathizers ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:14 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. No, most of them are Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FarLeftFist
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:41 AM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Thats not what they've been saying the whole time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:46 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. My prediction is that it will turn out that the shooting was not based on ideology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kali
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 12:13 PM Response to Reply #33 |
44. the more that comes out the more I agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:32 PM Response to Reply #33 |
73. Deleted message |
slackmaster
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
28. Delete, wrong place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DumpDavisHogg
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
35. Wasn't it already confirmed he's a registered Republican? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DumpDavisHogg
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:23 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. OK, I see now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 12:14 PM Response to Reply #37 |
45. Probably not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alp227
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:12 PM Response to Reply #45 |
72. Rathergate, anyone? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
38. But definitely anti-Democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 01:14 PM Response to Reply #38 |
54. haven't seen evidence that he was partisan. more anti-government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 02:30 PM Response to Reply #54 |
59. Don't you mean evidence OTHER THAN he shot a Democrat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 03:32 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. have you seen any evidence that he shot her BECAUSE she was a Democrat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:33 PM Response to Reply #60 |
78. I have not seen proof but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 07:17 PM Response to Reply #78 |
85. He shot a federal judge who was appointed to the bench by George H.W. Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zoeisright
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
46. So? His writings speak volumes. He listened to Bleck (sic) and the rest of those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 01:14 PM Response to Reply #46 |
55. and how, exactly do you know what radio he listened to and have you shared |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSPS
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
47. "Party affiliation" has nothing to do with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hugo_from_TN
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
56. Unregistered loser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 02:25 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Deleted message |
MrMickeysMom
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:26 PM Response to Reply #56 |
77. Isn't that the truth? I think it pretty much ends there, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
61. Seems clear he was not a Democrat anyway, or a progressive. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
69. Keep spinning CNN!!! I know you guys feel responsible too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
74. Deleted message |
daleo
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
75. Madness has no purpose, but it can have a plan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frank Cannon
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 09:03 AM Response to Reply #75 |
83. Thank you for that, Mr. Spock. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleo
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 10:26 PM Response to Reply #83 |
89. It's a great line, and very apt in this case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ncdemclt
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 12:28 AM Response to Original message |
79. Inquiry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 01:04 AM Response to Reply #79 |
80. Not much sense of irony I take it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberty Belle
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 02:14 AM Response to Original message |
81. So are many Teabaggers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrightKnight
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 03:57 AM Response to Original message |
82. Tea Party - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuckleB
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
88. So what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC