Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seniors May Have To Pay For Medicare Home Health

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:11 PM
Original message
Seniors May Have To Pay For Medicare Home Health
Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Congressional advisers are calling for a new out-of-pocket charge for Medicare home health care, a service that until now has been free of charge to patients.

The recommendation Thursday from the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission comes as lawmakers look for health care spending cuts to help get control of federal deficits. The advisory panel did not prescribe an amount, but its staff has suggested the charge be $150 for a series of related visits.

---snip
The service was once seen as a cost saver, since it's much cheaper than putting patients in the hospital, but costs are approaching $20 billion a year and rising.

Read more: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_MEDICARE_HOME_HEALTH?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-01-13-15-54-06
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. To paraphrase:
"It's the illegal occupations and bank bailouts, stupid!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. It is the tax cuts & occupation no the Bank Bailouts...
If you are talking about the deficit which I think you are. The Bank Bailout has almost all been paid back...Even AIG is going to be able to pay back what they borrowed. The Fed Gov could even make a profit after it is all done with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. It's true that I spoke out of ignorance.
Edited on Thu Jan-13-11 05:45 PM by timtom
But I do remember hearing that the amount given to bolster the financial institution, if divided among the adults in America would have been something like $10,000 per person. The details are sketchy just now, but a big windfall like that would have certainly stimulated the economy, at least for a short run.

Instead, we got record bonuses several years in a row.

I do appreciate the correction, however. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. But the tax free lending
and unlimited lines of credit still stand that permit risk free speculation and are worth trillions of dollars in free money to the biggest banks. Furthermore, the transfer of the nation's wealth continues unabated through upper income tax reductions, military spending, corporate criminality and even more obscene corporate welfare schemes. The day the fed makes a real profit off Goldman Sachs and makes it pay income taxes will be the day I believe we've turned the corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
46. AIG is paying nothing. They are trading special stock for regular stock,
which might be able to be sold for something someday, perhaps, but not all at once, and no guarantees, unlike the CASH we gave them.

Shoulda let them crash, this is moral hazard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #27
50. Google hidden costs of bailout
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. They act like being on SS is living large
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. They giveth and they taketh away.
My mother and I could have used this when my dad needed care. Instead we were forced to put him in a nursing home or figure out a way to get him care even though we both had jobs and had to work. They finally passed a bill providing this and it has been a blessing to families with elderly who need care, so now they are going to go back to the old model, which was more costly. I don't believe for a minute that there is a good reason, but no doubt a nursing home lobby stands to gain from this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Why is it all of the nursing home owners I have met are Republicans????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bad call. Home Health saves money, decreases hospitalizations, ER visits and
helps seniors / disabled stay in their homes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Agreed 100%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Ditto to the Agreed 100%
...Mom, that now lives with me, hasn't much money.

About $75,000 was drained away by an Assisted Living place in
just over 2 years.

I told her...she had to come live with me or be destitute...and
I will not allow her to be destitute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. And now, compassionate doctors will look for justifications for hospitalization. . .
Where before the patient was sent home and set up with in-home visits, now they'll stay in the hospital, cost substantially more, and not be as happy or content as they would if they were home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Just another way to take the house and any savings left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. That sounds like the reason at base.
I know a couple of home health nurses. They are excellent caring human beings. Both have told me hours are getting cut back now and it's huting their patients. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloriTexan Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
41. Except for those who don't have homes or savings to trade.
If only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Bingo. This is well-established.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChazII Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. +100 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
48. +100
And with most seniors, security/peace of mind is everything. :( :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. $20 Billion. That will buy us another 2 months of war.
To hell with the seniors. More war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. And there are almost 48 months until the end of 2014, or is the Afghanistan pull-out supposed to be
somewhat earlier? (if 2 months equal $20 billion, then 48 months must equal $480 billion). ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. actually I understated the costs significantly
The costs are around $4B per week for both wars - $16B per month.

So 48 months will be closer to $650B.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/07/AR2008030702846.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #31
45. It's beginning to look like future funding will be provided by reduced social security and Medicare
benefits now that tax cuts for our wealthiest have, for all practical purposes, been made permanent. After all, our pols would much rather send countless millions of seniors into dire poverty rather than ask those wealthiest to forgo having their tax cuts made permanent. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. or end the wars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colsohlibgal Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Great
Stick it to the seniors, they can always chow down on cat food. Just so zillionaires can keep their tax breaks. Nice to see we have our priorities straight.

Seriously this is outrageous - the right accuses us of starting class warfare when they, with the help of way too many democrats, has been conducting it since 1981 and Reagan. The transfer of money from bottom to top is ongoing.

It's a disgrace that more middle class people don't exercise their brain enough to figure this out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. How sad is that.
Screw the Seniors. The rich need more and Obamas wars roll on with nary a quibble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R-Just the beginning, I am afraid...I suppose no one could forsee
the boomers getting old over the last 40 years and actually needing these programs...Our government had decades to get this right and continually fucked the dog instead, Democrats and republicans both, and now it is a crisis.

We should stop the politicians pay and benefits-they are very close to useless.
Motherfuckers had no problems drafting us and sending us to Vietnam, as I recall...

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. Agree with other posters, but "proposal" is only to add a copay (and not after hospital discharge).


Also, the AP article says: "The recommendation exempts low-income patients, as well as those just discharged from the hospital. . . . . . "

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. Final blow to the middle class.
The very wealthy pay no inheritance tax on their millions. The middle class will have no inheritances because all of granny's money will go to pay for medical care in the final months of her life. That is what this is about. Impoverish the middle class and increase wealth of the wealthiest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. That's exactly how it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. So they can buy real estate and charge high rent. Hey... what a racket, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. Find a cheaper way to control the check-ins at airports and fire
half of the TSA employees.

Close half of the overseas military bases. Let our allies overseas protect themselves if they wish. We cannot afford to be the watchdogs of the world anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. This is going to lead to more hospitalizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. No kidding.
Medicare should support MORE home health, not less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
22. What "Home Health care"?
...hell, I didn't even know that there was such a thing.

I take care of my Mom...in my home. She has income of less
than $1000 a month (more than me!). Most of that goes for
her living expenses and when she hits the "drug gap", that
is where the rest of her money goes.

They want to start charging $150? Where the HELL are most
seniors supposed to come up with that? ESPECIALLY if the
are sick???

Another outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northoftheborder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Home Health Care:
It is available for seniors when they leave the hospital or temporary nursing care for home, provided by Medicare. It is not full time care, but it provides for caregivers to come and do some things which are prescribed by doctor, such as taking blood pressure, helping with certain things such as baths, doing physical therapy, a long list of things; some patients might need one or two, others different help. They usually come 2 or three times a week for a set number of weeks, I think 6. There are private companies set up to provide nurses or aides trained to provide this type of service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
39. Does she get the extra Part "D" assistance? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. Stopping the Bush tax cuts was a better plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. Say hello to more infections, neglect, theft and abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
26. MORE MORE MORE for WAR WAR WAR. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
32. wow..... obama does`t want to elected does he....
he opened box and he`d better figure out how to close it or he`s done in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
33. This sucks - we can bail out banks and Wall St, give tax cuts to the rich, but when it
comes to our seniors - fuck no. I sincerely hope that any Rep or Senator regardless of party who votes for this be throw out on their asses when next up for reelection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
34. Shame! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
35. Zillions for Wall Street, and not a dime for the poor
Edited on Thu Jan-13-11 06:50 PM by somone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
38. The most recent calculations on my own taxes
suggest that when all levels of government are accounted for I pay about 40% of my gross annual income in taxes. I'd like to see that money spent on universal health care, social services and general welfare, financial and corporate governance reform, public political financing, infrastructure repairs, green technologies, education, rapid transit, state banks and publicly funded R&D that is patented by government. This would be financially feasible if military spending were cut in half and corporations along with the wealthiest individuals and families also paid 40% of their incomes in taxes. But nobody asked me for my advise or for me to sit on a commission for making recommendation on how to spend my taxes. Imagine that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloriTexan Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
40. Crap - we just started this process.
Edited on Thu Jan-13-11 08:09 PM by FloriTexan
My husband is soon to be 99'er and we recently began caring for this mom who has very limited SS and only Medicare. I doubt we or she will be able to afford it if this passes. Crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
42. My Dad just finished this... it was a HUGE HELP
He's cleared to drive himself to the doc again, but for the six weeks he rehabbed after his hospital discharge it was a major benefit to the family. He couldn't have done it at $150.00 a week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grilled onions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
43. I Am Using This Service
I am not a senior but I am disabled and after hospitals were done with their part I went home. At the start it was nurse,PT and bath care. Finally it came down to wound care of the feet. I could not wear a shoe(still cannot). Could not walk sown a step. Still cannot. While there are doctors who can handle such wounds one needs a way to get there. AN ambulance is surely not a cheap way to go. My back is in such a mess my husband changes dressings as need be. The nurse who visits does the look see of the wound,measures healing,orders supplies. It is a vital service and I would never abuse it. It is also not a technically free service since I do pay for Medicare A,B and D. Once again the idiots who love to cut off everything but their own raises should see how many would be hurt if they could no longer afford such a service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
44. Its not so much hospitals, its nursing homes
Medicare Home Health care has saved hugely by allowing folks to remain in their homes instead of being committed to nursing homes. This action would cost Medicare much more than the current $20b cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #44
54. For those who had homes and families, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
49. I remember a day when AARP
was a powerful lobby and the pols would have been quaking in their jack-boots at the thought of angering the senior lobby. Now all AARP does is hawk insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
51. Heaven forbid we should end a war when we can screw over Grandma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
52. Those disabled and elderly who are so weak as to require home visits by doctors and nurses are
unlikely to fight this or hire lobbyists to fight this or to make big campaign donations or give jobs to our elected officials or their family members. That is why reducing life-saving services THE most vulnerable among us is safer and easier politically than allowing expiration of tax benefits for those earning over a million dollars a year, every year.



Medicare Payment Advisory Commission - Renamed Medicare Payment and Access Commission AND placed under the POTUS by a 2009 amendment to the Social Security Act. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:S.1110.IS:


Well, you can't claim no change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
53. and just as my mother needs this very much
to keep her out of a nursing home she can't afford. I hate them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobinA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
55. If They Pay
what it's generally worth, that shouldn't be a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC