Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US debt passes $14 trillion, Congress weighs caps

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 11:53 AM
Original message
US debt passes $14 trillion, Congress weighs caps
Source: Associated Press (yahoo.com)

WASHINGTON – The United States just passed a dubious milestone: Government debt surged to an all-time high, more than $14 trillion.


Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110115/ap_on_re_us/us_debt_wars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Military spending is the fundamental problem, of course
But instead social programs will get the axe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. no its not
the fundemental problem is a massive reduction in tax revenue and a large amount of people that need federal assistence due to the economy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I Think BOTH are Factors Here
not one without the other. Our military expanding the way it has was unsustainable for years, and the hippies warned us all. Now we see an unsustainable military budget and tax cuts for the greed heads that helped start the wars and occupations. Talk about insult to injury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Greed. It's the greed that motivates both.
And that's run up an environmental debt to the planet also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. its not unsustainable
if we had a sane tax revenue policy. Military spending is at about 4.5% of GDP- well below the peace-time coldwar average of about 6%. What happened was that we cut taxes and increased military spending by a good amount. If we kept the taxes the way they were during clinton and didn't have this recession we would be in fine budgetary situation (a deficit about 200 billion but the government doesnt need to run a surplus to be fiscally stable. As long as the deficit is less than the growth in GDP you can continue to borrow forever).

Also the military is in need of a major mordenization- all the reagan era equipment needs to be replaced within the next 10 years so gutting defense spending now is just going to make it that much worse 5-10 years down the line. Might as well pay for it now and get it over with. It also wouldnt hurt if they just ended these stupid wars. if they ended the wars you could take that 150 billion that we spend on it a year- take 50 billion put it back into the base budget modernization accounts and take the other 100 billion and either reduce the deficit or use it to pay for some unfunded programs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Just close 1/2 of our bases overseas. That would at least bring
the money back so that it could be spent here and stimulate our economy. We pay rent on many if not all of our overseas bases. We have hospitals, schools and housing and all sorts of stuff to keep up on some of those overseas bases. It is just ridiculous. In this day and age, how important is it that we keep a large on-the-ground troop presence in Germany or Japan? Some troops yes, maybe, and air strips, etc. But we have a pretty big troop presence in Europe -- probably also in the UK. How absurd can you get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. federal assistance as in unemployment benefits are not
'fundamental', they are temporary. And they are not nearly as large as the absurd, and permanent, military budget, that along with the stupid obama-bush tax cuts are what have been driving the deficits through the roof year after year since 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. +1, We need to tax the rich at the rates of the greatest generation (94%)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Now, the Republicons will WHINE that we need to do something
But they kept their fat mouths shut while AWOL Bush and Five Deferments Cheney were leading the Republicon Borrow-and-Spend Charge to FAIL City.

Republicons got no cred whatsoever on economics...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Make no mistake: we must slash Social Security by 25%
That'll pay for our uniquely American experience of two wars and tax cuts for the wealthiest.

As a needed precaution, I've instructed my Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner, to hand over all control of the money supply to the banks. This will ensure that our economy will be as good as our children envision it.

And hey, you turkeys on the left: who the &$%# else 'ya gonna vote for, chumps!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. THe US handed over control of the money supply to the banks in 1913.
Edited on Sat Jan-15-11 01:30 PM by denem
You have heard of the Federal Reserve, right?
A Woodrow Wilson triumph that the Progressive Party opposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. No matter how outrageous I try to be
Reality has beat me to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You said it all ...
... in just 80 words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. "weighing caps"... hmmm, we're 14 Trillion in the hole... CHARGE IT
:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. Massive amounts of government debt is not a problem.....
...when you do it all with:


- K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. I remember at the end of the 90's there was talk of the debt being eliminated completely
and there was discussion about what that would mean for t-bills and such like. (that discussion was pretty much over my head)

But ya know what was most important in those days had something to do with a blue dress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. But in reality the important issue
was the bursting of the tech bubble which put all hopes of a permanent surplus in the trash heap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faz Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
18. Raising government debt limit reflects people's attitude via Congress

deadbeats without thinking about repaying it.

Borrow as much as we could as long as we don't need to pay it back.

Spending what we don't have has become human right and national pastime!

Wow!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC