|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
SecularMotion
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 01:52 PM Original message |
Arlington Man Loses Gun License Due To Blog About Tucson Shooting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
1. Good. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
live love laugh
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
123. but but but...this violates his "2nd amendment rights"...?!!?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 02:07 AM Response to Reply #123 |
161. Thank you for that lovely strawman argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowcommander
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
2. Why does Massachusetts still require a license for gun ownership? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 01:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Um, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 06:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
57. Because they're sane. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stranger81
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 07:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
67. Answer me this: what do you think the phrase "well-regulated militia" means, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 09:44 PM Response to Reply #67 |
99. I'll make a go of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rgbecker
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:13 PM Response to Reply #99 |
124. Funny my copy reads the other way around..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:19 PM Response to Reply #124 |
128. Do post the text of "your copy". I'd love to read it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stranger81
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:00 AM Response to Reply #99 |
148. Yes and no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 02:48 AM Response to Reply #148 |
164. You can not have "people" without individuals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Towlie
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:02 AM Response to Reply #99 |
149. So where's this militia? I don't see it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 02:56 AM Response to Reply #149 |
166. You don't have to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:07 AM Response to Reply #67 |
151. Well regulated militia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 06:44 AM Response to Reply #151 |
174. do National Reservists bring their own weapons? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 09:28 AM Response to Reply #174 |
176. No. I suppose some of them have guns at home. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 03:02 PM Response to Reply #176 |
196. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 06:08 AM Response to Reply #176 |
213. seems like you missed my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 10:20 AM Response to Reply #176 |
222. Not quite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 07:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
72. Does a parade permit make meaningless the 1st amendment or the right of peaceful assembly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 09:46 PM Response to Reply #72 |
100. Is one required on ones own property? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 10:48 PM Response to Reply #100 |
118. Price of tea in China? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 10:51 PM Response to Reply #118 |
121. Great argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 12:08 AM Response to Reply #121 |
142. It means your question is irrelevant to the subject under discussion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 02:29 AM Response to Reply #142 |
162. Try and keep up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 12:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
146. So the gun nuts won't live here!!!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qnr
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:19 AM Response to Reply #2 |
152. Gee, good thing they didn't mention aircraft in the Constitution. Imagine the uproar if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
3. Should be permanent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
5. Good for Arlington police! K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lance_Boyle
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
6. WTF is a 'firearms license?' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nyc 4 Biden
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:10 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. WTF! And now I hear you need a barber's license to cut hair! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lance_Boyle
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I don't recall a second amendment for barbering... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. 2nd Amendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:57 PM Response to Reply #12 |
23. Wrong, there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 03:12 PM Response to Reply #23 |
32. Appeal to authority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 05:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
46. Sounds like you don't have a good argument... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 05:26 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 05:55 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. No projection; merely a sound description of your "arguments." nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:17 PM Response to Reply #51 |
187. Still nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straw Man
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 05:56 PM Response to Reply #48 |
53. Why is citing the Supreme Court... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 07:52 PM Response to Reply #53 |
76. IN THEORY, the SCOTUS tells us what the COTUS "really" means. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:15 PM Response to Reply #53 |
186. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 05:59 PM Response to Reply #32 |
55. But that is the exact type of argument you made yourself, an appeal to authority... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:27 PM Response to Reply #55 |
189. Where? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 07:17 PM Response to Reply #23 |
66. Constitutional Historians strongly disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stranger81
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 07:19 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Welcome to DU, and thanks for bringing some context to this discussion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 07:24 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 08:09 PM Response to Reply #71 |
83. Welcome aboard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 09:31 PM Response to Reply #71 |
95. Glad you signed up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 07:54 PM Response to Reply #66 |
78. Bingo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 09:23 PM Response to Reply #66 |
93. Wha huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 09:35 PM Response to Reply #93 |
96. Only Vermont is even relevant to interpreting the 2nd amendment. AND, note the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 10:00 PM Response to Reply #96 |
106. Are you at all familiar with the debates surrounding the bill of rights? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 10:29 PM Response to Reply #106 |
110. Yes, I am. Are you, or are you only repeating gun enthusiast talking points? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 10:37 PM Response to Reply #110 |
113. I actually have.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:54 PM Response to Reply #113 |
138. You have what? And, no, it doesn't prove what they were thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 12:14 AM Response to Reply #138 |
143. Previous versions, and state constitutions both lend to what was on their minds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #143 |
154. MAYBE state constitutions bear on what the Framers intended, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:25 AM Response to Reply #93 |
153. Lots of these are after the Constitution was passed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 09:57 AM Response to Reply #153 |
177. Those state constitutions came out one or more years after the 2nd (cept for VT & PA) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 09:56 PM Response to Reply #66 |
104. Sheer unabashed nonsense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 10:32 PM Response to Reply #104 |
112. "What was enacted in the final document is whats relevant." Bingo. No preamble to Bill of Rights in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 10:48 PM Response to Reply #112 |
117. aka, let's ignore what the writers of the document actually SAID.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:51 AM Response to Reply #117 |
160. Please remind me. Where did I argue intent doesn't matter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:05 AM Response to Reply #160 |
179. You've already demonstrated that you think the government 'grants' rights.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 10:49 PM Response to Reply #112 |
119. Heres a couple photos for your denial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:13 PM Response to Reply #119 |
125. LOL, what part of your own statement about "final document" did you not understand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:17 PM Response to Reply #125 |
127. The document in question, is the bill of rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:21 PM Response to Reply #127 |
130. NO. Please see my prior post, as edit ed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:27 PM Response to Reply #130 |
132. You can pretend to your hearts content. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:48 PM Response to Reply #132 |
135. Some statements deserve only to be ignored. This is one of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:54 PM Response to Reply #135 |
137. In other words, you can not refute my last post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:56 PM Response to Reply #137 |
139. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:43 AM Response to Reply #104 |
156. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 06:20 PM Response to Reply #156 |
216. Disagree all you like. Facts trump your opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:28 PM Response to Reply #66 |
190. Yawn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:31 PM Response to Reply #66 |
191. Breyer checked it all out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 03:23 PM Response to Reply #191 |
198. Lol.. You claim appeal to authority in post 198, then do it in post 199!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 04:14 PM Response to Reply #198 |
200. You can stop laughing now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 08:05 PM Response to Reply #23 |
80. Not for the first 200 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RantinRavin
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:59 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. Funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 03:11 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. You left part of it out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RantinRavin
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 03:27 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. You are correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 03:56 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Simple grammar error you made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RantinRavin
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 04:22 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. You did not dispose of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 04:31 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Try harder questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 08:13 PM Response to Reply #42 |
84. Seems the Founders never intended for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 10:50 PM Response to Reply #84 |
120. So you admit his interpretation is right, but you think it should be changed? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 03:57 AM Response to Reply #120 |
171. I don't think I said that anywhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:08 AM Response to Reply #171 |
180. By saying it may change, you're advocating that it _should_ change.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:33 PM Response to Reply #84 |
192. Tell it to the repigs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 10:29 PM Response to Reply #42 |
111. "because people own the guns" -- we have a breakthrough! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:35 AM Response to Reply #111 |
155. Where does the 2nd am. mention gun acquisition or ownership? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 03:00 AM Response to Reply #155 |
167. Follett vs. Town of McCormick - Established case law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 04:04 AM Response to Reply #167 |
172. Then you feel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 04:47 AM Response to Reply #172 |
173. Not quite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 07:38 AM Response to Reply #173 |
175. While I agree with most of the basics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 04:18 PM Response to Reply #175 |
202. "No new laws" is not the same thing as "No laws". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:35 PM Response to Reply #167 |
193. Ha HA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 04:27 PM Response to Reply #193 |
204. Ha indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 04:33 PM Response to Reply #204 |
206. Oh boy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:10 AM Response to Reply #155 |
181. And you accuse others of moving the goal posts?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:20 PM Response to Reply #111 |
188. Yes, we do! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 03:26 PM Response to Reply #188 |
199. As I've asked you before.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 04:17 PM Response to Reply #199 |
201. This part of it supports me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 04:48 PM Response to Reply #201 |
208. Paste-regurgitation isn't an explanation.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 05:05 PM Response to Reply #208 |
209. You're kidding, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 05:43 PM Response to Reply #209 |
210. You are 'assuming the antecedent'.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 06:09 PM Response to Reply #210 |
211. Give it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 06:50 PM Response to Reply #211 |
212. Yes, protecting the ability to raise a militia is WHY they protected the right to keep and bear arms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 01:38 PM Response to Reply #212 |
214. Deleted message |
X_Digger
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 03:00 PM Response to Reply #214 |
215. My arguments are my own.. if you find them too complex, perhaps you should study more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 06:52 PM Response to Reply #41 |
61. Heh. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 08:15 PM Response to Reply #41 |
85. Because people comprised the militia and were used in an emergency, like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RantinRavin
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 04:33 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. I assume you can also explain why your interpretation was soundly defeated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 04:48 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Using guncite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 06:06 PM Response to Reply #44 |
56. Deleted sub-thread |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 07:42 PM Response to Reply #43 |
74. Because the Founders considered it redundant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:43 PM Response to Reply #74 |
134. Yes, the language is in there, but do you know for certain that the Founders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 03:20 PM Response to Reply #134 |
197. Gun lovers can read dead people's minds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 08:20 PM Response to Reply #43 |
86. Please give links to evidence of "sound defeat--and alleged defeat of "for the common defense" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 06:48 PM Response to Reply #35 |
59. "People" is a collective noun. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 08:22 PM Response to Reply #59 |
87. Nice point! I never thought of that. "We, the people." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scruffy1
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:52 PM Response to Reply #59 |
136. This is true in all the body of American law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 04:23 PM Response to Reply #59 |
203. Good one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 06:33 PM Response to Reply #59 |
217. yeah...you're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 06:48 PM Response to Reply #217 |
218. And if a cop has a reasonable suspicion that a crime is being committed, he can just walk right in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Fri Jan-21-11 09:28 PM Response to Reply #218 |
219. Whos trying to make it complex? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 08:20 AM Response to Reply #219 |
221. "People" is not equal to "persons" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 03:03 PM Response to Reply #221 |
223. Why then does amendment 4 protect the rights of the invididual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 04:21 PM Response to Reply #223 |
224. "The right of the people to be secure in their persons..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 05:55 PM Response to Reply #224 |
225. Nice try. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Sun Jan-23-11 12:00 AM Response to Reply #225 |
226. It's like I'm talking to John Cleese at the arguement clinic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 08:00 PM Response to Reply #35 |
79. If I say, "Because your kids are starving, here's five bucks," would you assume |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:04 PM Response to Reply #79 |
122. "I'm out of soda, I'm going to the store." -- do stores only sell soda? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:59 PM Response to Reply #122 |
140. How about answering my question iinstead of asking an irrelevant one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 12:25 AM Response to Reply #140 |
145. Just as relevant, I'll explain why.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 12:50 AM Response to Reply #145 |
147. Still not relevant to why you are given a right (or given anything else). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 03:04 AM Response to Reply #147 |
168. Fail. Nobody is GIVEN a right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:14 AM Response to Reply #147 |
182. We were discussing a grammatical construct of the time period.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 06:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
58. How do you define the phrase "the people" as it is written in the Second Amendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 07:22 PM Response to Reply #58 |
69. A better question is what does Bear Arms mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:13 PM Response to Reply #69 |
126. See Justice Ginsburg's commentary.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:49 AM Response to Reply #126 |
159. What's interesting is that Ginsburg |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:16 AM Response to Reply #159 |
183. Yes, she got caught contradicting herself quite well, no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 02:38 AM Response to Reply #126 |
163. And? Btw, was that the majority opinion, a concurring opinion, or a dissenting opinon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:21 AM Response to Reply #163 |
184. keep = own / have.. bear = carry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 07:04 PM Response to Reply #12 |
64. Funny thing about the federalist and anti-federalist papers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 09:51 PM Response to Reply #64 |
102. No, but they are often looked to, including by federal courts, to tell us what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:20 PM Response to Reply #102 |
129. They are important, no doubt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:04 AM Response to Reply #129 |
150. I never said they were important, For now, I will neither agree nor disagree as to that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scruffy1
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 12:01 AM Response to Reply #102 |
141. To me original intent and astrology have a lot in common |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 02:12 PM Response to Reply #64 |
195. Another funny thing about those papers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 09:50 PM Response to Reply #12 |
101. How about an appeal to the document in question, itself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 09:58 PM Response to Reply #101 |
105. As I explained at length to you before, there is NO preamble |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 10:41 PM Response to Reply #105 |
114. First, you must have me confused with another poster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 12:23 AM Response to Reply #114 |
144. No, beevul. We have had this debate on other threads.. Your failure to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 02:10 PM Response to Reply #101 |
194. Deleted message |
beevul
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 04:30 PM Response to Reply #194 |
205. Claiming something has been refuted... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 04:34 PM Response to Reply #205 |
207. Yeah yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. How does needing a license negate the second amendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:45 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Such licenses are usually used as a means to insure "undesirables" don't get weapons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. People have to pass background checks to get guns, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:53 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Background checks have a specific set of public criteria to pass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:55 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. And required permits? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 03:04 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. They're not, really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 05:57 PM Response to Reply #28 |
54. Not for all handguns, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnorman
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 06:49 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. Thanksfor that clear and well reasoned discussion! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 07:23 PM Response to Reply #54 |
70. You're saying the 2A is obsolete. And you're so right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 09:43 PM Response to Reply #54 |
98. Concealed carry permits are a much different subject than licensing for any guns. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 10:17 PM Response to Reply #54 |
109. So, the only point of the 2nd amendment was outshooting the federal government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atypical Liberal
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 03:25 PM Response to Reply #22 |
34. Most states don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RantinRavin
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 03:01 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. Incorrect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 03:03 PM Response to Reply #18 |
27. The NICS bg test is designed to keep felons and adjudicated mental incompetents... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:57 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. Deleted message |
TheWraith
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 03:05 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Thanks for proving you have nothing but insults, and no way to rebut my point. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThatPoetGuy
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 03:44 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. Odd moderation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 06:54 PM Response to Reply #15 |
62. Here in NY, my immigrant grandfather & immigrant father BOTH had gun licenses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lance_Boyle
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 03:22 PM Response to Reply #13 |
33. Requiring a license to excercise a Constitutionally-protected individual right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 08:23 PM Response to Reply #33 |
88. You need to register to vote. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 10:46 PM Response to Reply #88 |
116. Where in the U.S. Cons. is your right to vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 03:44 AM Response to Reply #116 |
170. Article 2 Section 1. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSzymeczek
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 09:41 PM Response to Reply #33 |
97. People need to get permits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 10:45 PM Response to Reply #33 |
115. LOL, there are MANY such requirements on free speech AND free asso- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 10:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
108. Agree, but 2nd amend. says "keep and bear arms." It says nothing about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 07:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
73. No amendment for falling in love or having children, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Right, barbers are protected by Amendment... uh... which one?.... hm..nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThatPoetGuy
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. "Abominations"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 03:07 PM Response to Reply #11 |
30. You should insist on your state forwarding mental competency hearings... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThatPoetGuy
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 03:30 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. I would be happy to discuss this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 05:04 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. I see your point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. well, you're wrong. So think again. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:48 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Stirring retort, really. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 04:04 PM Response to Reply #6 |
40. I'm fairly certain they were referring to an FFL that allows a person to be a gun dealer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 08:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
89. Link to SCOTUS case holding gun licenses un-Constitutional, Lance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sudopod
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 09:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
103. LOL u mad? :D nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
7. Good for you, Arlington. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savalez
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:17 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
16. While I seriously doubt that this guy is dangerous, I can't fault the police too much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tooeyeten
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 07:52 PM Response to Reply #16 |
77. you can't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
21. I have no problem with this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
39. That is the way to do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
47. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FailureToCommunicate
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
49. Thanks Captain Bongiorno. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
50. Convincting this man of a felony, or even of certain misdemeanors... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
james0tucson
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
52. yeah, that's something to lose a license for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
63. Good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicub
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
65. Echoing the sentiment of others - Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tooeyeten
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
75. so what about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alp227
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
81. Good pre-emptive action before he acted on his impluses n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:44 AM Response to Reply #81 |
157. Or someone else acts on the blogger's urging. We don't need to give |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
James48
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
82. Open secrets.org says- he's a political donor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
90. The best, and worst thing about the internet is assholes like this get exposed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pasto76
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
91. Good! Dude is free to say whatever he wants, but there are consequences |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 01:48 AM Response to Reply #91 |
158. Enjoyable and apt post. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
92. You can LOSE a Gun License? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 09:26 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. What about gun licenses in Hawaii? Will they be questioned by Orly Taits?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
107. Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
131. No sympathy for a Dumbass who knew the rules and broke them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Wed Jan-19-11 11:31 PM Response to Reply #131 |
133. +1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 02:52 AM Response to Original message |
165. So, 100+ plus posts later and no mention of what the Mass. law actually says? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Youth Uprising
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 03:29 AM Response to Original message |
169. Sick bastards! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freshwest
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:53 AM Response to Reply #169 |
185. Thanks, Youth Uprising. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
178. Incitement to violence. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess
![]() |
Sat Jan-22-11 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
220. They are coming out of the woodwork. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC