|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 09:06 AM Original message |
Jobless claims fall more than expected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
1. The four-week moving average of new claims ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nyy1998
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:19 AM Response to Reply #1 |
17. Right, because the 4,000 out of chart range of 400,000 isn't going to show much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
2. Isn't that special... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 09:36 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Dealing with American realities. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 09:43 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Months and months would be fine, we are into years and years now. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 09:55 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. The hole is deep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:07 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Self delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:35 AM Response to Reply #8 |
22. In order for there to be a recovery, there needs to be 150k jobs added per month... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:53 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. There needs to be at least 125,000 and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:09 AM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Thank you. Hell, seems as though we've been posting about 99ers for a year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:02 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. NEW jobless claims dropped. Everyone else was already unemployed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:37 AM Response to Reply #12 |
24. isn't is sad that we now use dark humor to get us through the night? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moose65
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
3. Someone will be here to piss on this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:17 AM Response to Reply #3 |
16. This kind of attempt never works and probably violates DU rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
4. Just means there are more 99er's. Out of sight out of mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 09:56 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. No it doesn't - that LIE has been refuted dozens if not hundreds of times on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:20 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. So, no more 99ers are lingering? Cool, if true, but I know some. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:22 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Nobody said that. However 99er dropping on benefits can't explain drop in INITIAL CLAIMS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bread_and_roses
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
7. oh whoop de do! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 09:56 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. "This number is meaningless." I know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
11. They also rose more than expected near year end. November, was it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coyote_Bandit
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
15. something that is completely unrelated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:25 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. But is related to job destruction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coyote_Bandit
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:59 AM Response to Reply #20 |
28. Even if there was NO job destruction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:36 AM Response to Reply #15 |
23. Not unrelated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coyote_Bandit
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:47 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Ummmm......No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 11:02 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. "The labor force participation rate continues to drop." Now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
21. Used one of my very, very rare unrecs. Info in OP article is somewhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 10:38 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Why not just ignore the thread? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mahatmakanejeeves
![]() |
Thu Jan-20-11 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
30. Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report (01/20/2011) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC