|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
sabra
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:24 AM Original message |
Clarence Thomas releases details of wife's past employment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
1. OH that $600,000 sorry i missed that ...... C Thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patricia92243
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
2. Did she receive w-2 or 1099 from her "employers?" If not, why are they not held responsible also. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kber
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 12:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. This was his financial disclosure, not tax filings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
3. Dancer, escort, drug mule...eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
4. Lying scumbag. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
5. Stalker of Anita Hill should be there n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
6. " omissions" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
7. I still can't figure out why they allow husband-wife conflicts of interest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 12:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. SCOTUS can apparently do whatever they want whenever they want. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 03:01 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. 2000 proved that -- !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
8. So, Clarence Thomas is qualified to be on the Supreme Court, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Haaaahahaha. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
9. Fire his ass!!!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
12. Late does not make it right. I think he should be investigated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
forty6
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
13. This should be enough for a groundswell of people from President on down to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
14. blaming a misunderstanding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
16. Now, was he cheating? Was he ignorant of the rules? Did he just interpret them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LuckyTheDog
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
17. Thomas should resign... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 03:02 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Agree .. .Thomas is a pervert -- and unqualified -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
20. Hmm... what is this "Vivid Entertainment" and "Club Jenna" listing for her income? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JudyM
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
21. Goodness me, "Justice" Thomas ignoring a conflict of interest ? (sarcasm) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC