Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court Judge Scalia ticketed in traffic accident

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 12:20 AM
Original message
Supreme Court Judge Scalia ticketed in traffic accident
Source: Los Angeles Times

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was ticketed by U.S. Park Police after being found responsible for a four-car traffic accident on his way to the high court Tuesday morning.

The incident occurred just before 9 a.m. on the southbound George Washington Parkway across the Potomac River from Washington in Virginia. Scalia reportedly rear-ended another driver who had stopped in traffic, and two other vehicles followed behind. No one was injured.

Scalia was handed a $70 fine for the infraction of following too closely. The justice, in his 25th year on the nation's highest court, can appeal the fine to a U.S. magistrate if he chooses, according to a Park Police spokesman, while acknowledging that was unlikely.

"He probably hasn't a clue how to contest a traffic ticket," David Schlosser, the spokesman, joked.



Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-scalia-traffic-ticket-20110330,0,7499934.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. I want to see his ass hauled off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hauled off?
For a traffic ticket?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. If he doesn't pay the fine, maybe.
Maybe I'm thinking to big for something so small.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Yes--the fucker thought it was appropriate treatment for the rest of us for not having a seatbelt--
A misdemeanor under Texas law....and this fucker caused a 4-car accident.

http://supreme.justia.com/us/532/318/case.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
24. Attempted murder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
34. Who gets "hauled off" for a traffic ticket?
Geez...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. Here's the Supreme Court case where Scalia said that was okay--
http://supreme.justia.com/us/532/318/case.html

If Ms. Atwater can get hauled off for not having a seatbelt on, why not Scalia for causing an accident?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. She was in Texas, and the Court rightfully applied that state's law.
Scalia was not in Texas. I don't think anyone should be arrested for a minor traffic violation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #34
55. My husband. They sent a cop to our house when he hadn't paid by a certain date even though there
was no date listed on the ticket or anything. Then they took $300 or they would haul his ass to jail. My husband is American Indian, doesn't drink and is a great citizen. I was shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. He probably got arrested for
Edited on Thu Mar-31-11 12:18 PM by Hosnon
(allegedly) violating the court order to appear/pay, not for the violation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Outa my way, quack quack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oddly, I don't think that can be done to a legislator on her way to session
Edited on Wed Mar-30-11 12:42 AM by jberryhill
I would have thought the same principle would apply to a federal judge on the way to court.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. you're correct. the supreme court doesn't have the same time imperatives on voting
congress doesn't, and can't practically, delay votes just because one congresscritter got arrested.
the supreme court, on the other hand, can easily delay, they're a comparatively slow body anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Brilliant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
31. Which law prevents a legislator from getting a traffic ticket while on the way to the office?
Edited on Wed Mar-30-11 08:03 AM by No Elephants
Okay, I found it: Article One, Section 6, The Constitution of the United States:

Section 6 - Compensation
(The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States.) (The preceding words in parentheses were modified by the 27th Amendment.) They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.

No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Here:
http://legacy.c-span.org/questions/week145.asp

"Freedom from "arrest" has been interpreted to mean also from detention or delay during an attempt at civil law enforcement."

"House rules specifically do not allow one of its Members to appear in court, even voluntarily."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #33
41. Thanks, but I had quickly posted the correct answer to my own question.
Edited on Wed Mar-30-11 10:08 AM by No Elephants
"Freedom from "arrest" has been interpreted to mean also from detention or delay during an attempt at civil law enforcement."

Detain or delay is part of the very definition of "arrest," not only an interpretation of "arrest." Think what the word arrest means in "Arrested Developmnent," not only formally placing someone in legal custody.

rest (-rst)
v. ar·rest·ed, ar·rest·ing, ar·rests
v.tr.
1. To stop; check: a brake that automatically arrests motion; arrested the growth of the tumor.
2. To seize and hold under the authority of law.
3. To capture and hold briefly (the attention, for example); engage.
v.intr.
To undergo cardiac arrest: The patient arrested en route to the hospital.
n.
1.
a. The act of detaining in legal custody: the arrest of a criminal suspect.
b. The state of being so detained: a criminal under arrest.
2. A device for stopping motion, especially of a moving part.
3. The act of stopping or the condition of being stopped.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ar·resta·ble adj.
ar·rester, ar·restor n.
ar·restment n.

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arrest <əˈrɛst>
vb (tr)
1. (Law) to deprive (a person) of liberty by taking him into custody, esp under lawful authority
2. (Transport / Nautical Terms) to seize (a ship) under lawful authority
3. (Medicine) to slow or stop the development or progress of (a disease, growth, etc.)
4. to catch and hold (one's attention, sight, etc.)
(Law)
arrest judgment Law to stay proceedings after a verdict, on the grounds of error or possible error
can't get arrested Informal (of a performer) is unrecognized and unsuccessful he can't get arrested here but is a megastar in the States
n
1. (Law) the act of taking a person into custody, esp under lawful authority
2. (Transport / Nautical Terms) the act of seizing and holding a ship under lawful authority
3. (Law) the state of being held, esp under lawful authority under arrest
4. Also called arrestation <ˌærɛsˈteɪʃən> {b]the slowing or stopping of the development or progress of something
5. the stopping or sudden cessation of motion of something a cardiac arrest

Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #41
53. Yeah, in fact a traffic stop is the first thing I'd think of
Edited on Wed Mar-30-11 02:11 PM by NYC Liberal
when reading that clause. Since votes occur in Congress even if some members are absent, it's probably the most likely thing to delay them and potentially cause them to miss votes going to the Capitol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #31
37. note that in theory, at least, a congresscritter could be mailed a parking ticket.
the constitution merely prevents the police from arresting or delaying the congresscritter's "commute" and of course office hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #37
47. Constitution says zero about only the "commute" or only office hours
Edited on Wed Mar-30-11 10:23 AM by No Elephants
Please read the language quoted in Reply 31 carefully, noting the word "and."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. you put in bold the relevant section.
they can't be arrested going to or from or during a session of congress, but that doesn't prevent them from getting a ticket for acts done during those times, provided the ticket isn't given during that time and doesn't relate to speech in session.

so a congresscritter speeding to a session of congress could get a ticket based on one of those photo-and-mail speed traps. a congresscritter who runs over someone while driving to a session of congress couldn't be arrested at that time, but could certainly be arrested after returning home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
35. There aren't the same separation of powers issues with the Supreme Court.
If the executive arrests a Justice before a vote on a case it has an interest in, it would be extremely easy to delay the vote. Also, I don't think votes on cases are as structured as they are in the Congress, i.e., it would be difficult for the executive to know when to arrest the Justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. A head-on collision with the Constitution?
Maybe the judge will look the other way for a one time only waiving of the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
28. What does the Constitution have to do with this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. He asked the Officer; "Do you know Who I Am?",
The officer replied; "No, but maybe if you hum a few bars."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. Too bad he doesn't follow precedent that closely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. Thread win--I'm jealous, frankly....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
26. Snap! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. If I was to dislike a person....he would be on the top ten list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nostradammit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. You are a good person opihimoimoi -
Of few things am I certain but of that I certainly am.

My top ten list has about a hundred names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. "But, but, but, what about me?" - Coke Can Thomas (R - Stooge)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #22
49. Yup.....Him too.....what a loser....both had given us W Bush...
n you know the rest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. For some reason I pictured Mr. Magoo.
Driving along oblivious to all that surrounds him and leaving a trail of destruction behind him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Yup, your Mr. Magoo, only with Boris Badinov's disposition. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
11. HE caused the accident?
Time to check into whichever hospital does those really thorough VIP checkups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertDiamond Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
14. He should have been given a breathalyzer test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #14
45. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawnKorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
15. Stupid Republican drivers!
They are half the problem on the roads today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
16. Why doesn't he have a driver?
We had talks with our family members when they reach a certain age, before they had accidents. Just sayin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. Why doesn't he have a driver?


Which is a good question. He doesn't have a driver? In DC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #16
32. Depends on the distance.. A lot of guys use a three wood anyway /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
20. Who was he on the phone with?
I bet he was distracted - Dick was inviting him for more bird hunting or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theothersnippywshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. Probably sexting with the Whore of Babble-On. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #29
30.  !
:o

Ack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
21. CALL CONGRESS!!!! !!!!111111 1111!!!!!!!!!!! RIGHT FUCKING NOW!!!111!!!
Edited on Wed Mar-30-11 05:58 AM by slackmaster
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
25. So he's as blind literally, as he is figuratively? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
36. There's nothing in the Constitution that says you can't rear-end somebody.
It's an original position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. Obviously you've never read Scalia's dissent in 'Lawrence.' n/t
Edited on Wed Mar-30-11 09:16 AM by msanthrope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hassin Bin Sober Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #36
46. Who knew? I always thought missionary was the original position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
43. Too fast and too close is standard behavior for DC drivers.
I don't much like Justice Scalia's judicial opinions, but here I'm mainly glad to hear no one was hurt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
44. First time I ever wished a cop had planted dope in someones car. nt
Edited on Wed Mar-30-11 10:16 AM by Zorra
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
48. Four people need to sue Tony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Nexus Donating Member (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
50. Another case of "Where's my checkbook and who do I make it out to?" nt
Edited on Wed Mar-30-11 10:32 AM by The Nexus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
52. Hmmm.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
54. Put him in the butt slammer and say it's only a machine, not a person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
56. "...responsible for a four-car traffic accident..."
....fat tony is dangerous in more ways than one....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
57. Scalia should know about following to close
Some say; "if Dick Cheney stopped abruptly, Tony Scalia's head would go right up Cheney's a$$"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC