|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Lars77
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 05:49 AM Original message |
Hasidic newspaper edits Secretary of State out of Situation Room photo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scuba
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 05:58 AM Response to Original message |
1. Wonder what Bill would think about Hil's pose possibly being "sexually suggestive". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patricia92243
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. It is always interesting how one person can see something from a picture and others see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 08:08 AM Response to Reply #1 |
18. This has nothing to do with sex and everything to do with gender oppression. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scuba
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 09:03 AM Response to Reply #18 |
28. I understood that point. Mine was just being silly. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walk away
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 02:44 PM Response to Reply #28 |
96. -1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scuba
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:44 PM Response to Reply #96 |
113. Minus one for silliness? OK, I'm down with that. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iscooterliberally
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 12:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
64. I wonder what this paper would look like, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DuaneBidoux
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
120. I wonder how many Hasidic women secretly lust after Obama? My wife certainly thinks he's hot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smarmie Doofus
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 05:58 AM Response to Original message |
2. There's a SNL skit in there somewhere. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turbineguy
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 11:45 AM Response to Reply #2 |
57. Wait... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:07 AM Response to Original message |
3. Got relatively familiar with the Hasidics since I moved here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars77
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:54 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. In London, Hasidics made the city remove bicycle paths in their neighbourhood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 07:48 AM Response to Reply #8 |
15. I remember that story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 08:39 AM Response to Reply #8 |
20. I'm surprised a city that size would cave to a prudish minority... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 09:03 AM Response to Reply #8 |
29. Also happened (happening?) in Brooklyn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 10:19 PM Response to Reply #29 |
121. I was walking down the sidewalk with a friend in NYC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sakabatou
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:02 PM Response to Reply #121 |
164. Did that really happen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:13 PM Response to Reply #164 |
166. Yes, as a matter of fact it did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sakabatou
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:34 PM Response to Reply #166 |
167. Fucking fundies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 10:26 AM Response to Reply #8 |
45. in nyc too. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barbtries
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 02:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
101. or even any better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DuaneBidoux
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 09:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
118. The enemy is and always has been fundamentalism. Of any stripe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dipsydoodle
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:59 AM Response to Reply #8 |
146. That was New York : not London |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 12:05 PM Response to Reply #3 |
60. Yep, too true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:07 AM Response to Original message |
4. ah...the people of the book.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:18 AM Response to Original message |
5. If I were a reader of that paper, I'd be curious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scottybeamer70
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:50 AM Response to Original message |
6. wow....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:54 AM Response to Original message |
7. Religion the number 1 supporter of 2nd class citizenry for women. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:56 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patricia92243
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:56 AM Response to Original message |
10. Oppression is so sad for everybody involved. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brickbat
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 07:01 AM Response to Original message |
12. Pathetic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mahatmakanejeeves
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 07:12 AM Response to Original message |
13. Their foreheads were quite suggestive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Loudmxr
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 07:25 AM Response to Original message |
14. OTOH they publish pics of MEN that get their women HOT!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 08:01 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. "You can leave your hat on.." Okay, that was funny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trud
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 09:22 AM Response to Reply #14 |
32. do they let their women read newspapers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
108. Loved them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
connecticut yankee
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
16. They also pray |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mosby
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 01:24 PM Response to Reply #16 |
76. Give me a break |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
U4ikLefty
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 01:58 PM Response to Reply #76 |
85. You both are insulting to the average Muslim. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cherchez la Femme
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 02:48 PM Response to Reply #85 |
97. If the truth is so insulting, perhaps the Hasidim should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eyeontheprize
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 02:38 PM Response to Reply #76 |
94. You deny that Hasidic men make this prayer daily? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mosby
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 03:57 PM Response to Reply #94 |
105. "Halacha 6" is not a talmudic reference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spotbird
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 06:02 PM Response to Reply #105 |
114. So the Hasidim pray for good things as well while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mosby
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 08:01 PM Response to Reply #114 |
115. If your interested in the Chassids |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spotbird
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 09:08 PM Response to Reply #115 |
117. But the male Chassids still thank God they aren't women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:34 AM Response to Reply #114 |
132. Not only superior status as men. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:31 AM Response to Reply #105 |
131. It's bigoted/arrogant and sexist language. No getting around it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
19. Yep, can't allow those sexy women's pictures to be seen. Wonder why their god man men so weak? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalEsto
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
21. Disgraceful. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
22. This thread was promoted to the lead article on the front page? Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UnrepentantLiberal
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 08:58 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Which posts display hatred? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 09:00 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. How can we embrace a religion that is anti-women? (and this about a sect of a major faith) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 09:02 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. What? DU is instead supposed to glorify ignorance? Are we to be SHAMED into |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 11:32 AM Response to Reply #27 |
53. Judaism blatently denies women? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 11:43 AM Response to Reply #53 |
56. that poster said no such thing.... why put words into that poster's mouth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 12:46 PM Response to Reply #56 |
69. I didn't put any words in poster's mouth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 01:15 PM Response to Reply #69 |
75. Deleted message |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:38 AM Response to Reply #69 |
134. I read it again, and you did put A word in her mouth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:52 AM Response to Reply #134 |
143. Disingenuous remark. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:41 AM Response to Reply #53 |
136. I'm fairly sure Hasidim did not make Meir leader of Israel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:43 AM Response to Reply #136 |
138. How disingenuous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:49 AM Response to Reply #138 |
141. How dishonest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:51 AM Response to Reply #141 |
142. I don't think your post was dishonest, just disingenuous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 03:51 AM Response to Reply #142 |
150. ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 03:53 AM Response to Reply #150 |
151. Indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cherchez la Femme
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 02:51 PM Response to Reply #27 |
99. Well, at least not put it on the front page *gasp*! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PatSeg
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 09:07 AM Response to Reply #22 |
31. I'm more inclined to believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 10:05 AM Response to Reply #22 |
39. Sorry, but you bet i'm going to take a dump on any religion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 11:24 AM Response to Reply #22 |
51. Rejecting sexist religious crap? Yes glad to see this on the front page. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #22 |
65. A tour de force in "concern" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cherchez la Femme
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 12:44 PM Response to Reply #22 |
68. But a sizable sect of a popular religion demeaning women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trud
![]() |
Wed May-11-11 08:59 AM Response to Reply #68 |
171. they attack women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 01:10 PM Response to Reply #22 |
74. A squawk and run post? Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:36 PM Response to Reply #74 |
112. Exactly which response to mine required further discussion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 06:31 PM Response to Reply #112 |
168. Required? None, enjoy your free will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 08:50 AM Response to Original message |
23. Patriarchal sexist pigs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
24. I thought it was Anti-Hillary but here it was just anti-women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 09:03 AM Response to Reply #24 |
30. Yeah, but they are surrounded by men they are not related to - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 01:46 PM Response to Reply #24 |
83. They are when you are used to seeing this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 04:45 AM Response to Reply #83 |
153. Not Hillary. She is showing less in that photo than those women would be if they were indoors. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 04:58 AM Response to Reply #24 |
156. I'm not at all sure sexual suggestiveness had a thing to do with this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
33. Not so different from what our own corporate-press does to women every day -- !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onpatrol98
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 09:52 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. hmmm.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 11:10 AM Response to Reply #36 |
49. hmmm..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onpatrol98
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 12:48 PM Response to Reply #49 |
71. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cherchez la Femme
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 12:59 PM Response to Reply #33 |
72. But I just love the many commercials where a male is teaching |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 01:33 PM Response to Reply #72 |
79. Love it -- but ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
34. Do these dudes think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Keith Bee
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
35. Every religion has its nutjobs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 10:07 AM Response to Reply #35 |
40. Actually, this one seems to be official policy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 11:29 AM Response to Reply #40 |
52. Don't be stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 12:26 PM Response to Reply #52 |
63. And what led you to believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eyeontheprize
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 03:22 PM Response to Reply #52 |
103. When did Hasidic Jews become the same as all Jews? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 12:39 PM Response to Reply #35 |
67. I think the politically correct term for those who hear voices in their heads is "schizophrenic" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
37. ... Apparently the paper doesn't allow publishing of women in any of the pictures as they could be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Township75
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
38. All I could think of when I saw the original photo was "TAKE IT OFF! TAKE IT ALLLLL OFF!!!!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frances
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
41. I think Obama is wise not to show photos of a dead Osama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cherchez la Femme
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 12:15 PM Response to Reply #41 |
62. Ummm, OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frances
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 01:42 PM Response to Reply #62 |
82. Sorry I wasn't clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ejbr
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
42. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snagglepuss
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 10:53 AM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Or better yet put Susan B Anthony on the ten dollar bill! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 01:50 PM Response to Reply #46 |
84. Now THAT is funny. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
43. Those Hasidics have a strange and active imagination ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cherchez la Femme
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 02:58 PM Response to Reply #43 |
100. Well they *are* showing a lot of skin! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Love Bug
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
44. Fundamentalist religion hates women? Who knew? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zambero
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 10:58 AM Response to Reply #44 |
47. I imagine Golda Meier may have posed a problem for them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eyeontheprize
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 02:07 PM Response to Reply #47 |
92. The extremists in the Jewish faith are just as misogynistic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cherchez la Femme
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 03:01 PM Response to Reply #92 |
102. The silver lining is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UnrepentantLiberal
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 02:33 PM Response to Reply #47 |
93. Yeah, and Golda was a real temptress who would have given Madona |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 10:38 PM Response to Reply #47 |
122. Golda Meier might be somebody they hate, actually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainer
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
48. the dark-skinned guy sitting in the photo is the real hottie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
50. How much does Religion suck? Let me count the ways ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walk away
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 02:49 PM Response to Reply #50 |
98. A million trillion skadillion! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
54. Why didn't they just put a beard on her? Sexist pigs. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nihil
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 06:43 AM Response to Reply #54 |
159. "Are there any women here today?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 11:47 AM Response to Reply #159 |
161. Ha! Excellent! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
55. Myth and religion are synonymous... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
58. That just proves that every religion has its fringe element. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 01:27 PM Response to Reply #58 |
78. or rightwing Christian nutbags |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iandhr
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
59. This is awful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 02:01 PM Response to Reply #59 |
89. meh, you cant take responsibility for all factions/people in your religion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertDiamond
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
61. Many "Christian" sects also teach the oppression of women. Shakyamuni (AKA "the Buddha") |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlbertCat
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
66. Just another reminder that "Religion is truth"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 03:58 PM Response to Reply #66 |
106. Not only religion, but all imaginary man-made constructs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
70. Not much difference betwen Fundy Muslims and Hassids |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cherchez la Femme
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 01:05 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. After years of ignoring it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TxVietVet
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
77. Maybe we should photoshop them out of the press. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
80. Well it's just another source of media with an agenda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 02:00 PM Response to Reply #80 |
88. what would they do if she was elected president? never post a pic of the president? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blacksheep214
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
81. We are not the United States of Religion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 01:59 PM Response to Reply #81 |
87. how are they breaking the law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MountainLaurel
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 03:37 PM Response to Reply #87 |
104. In this case, copyright law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 08:05 PM Response to Reply #104 |
116. any more than when we take a pic of obama and post MISSION accomplished behind it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 10:44 PM Response to Reply #116 |
123. All pictures are copyrighted. Period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 03:20 AM Response to Reply #123 |
149. Are you 100% sure that altering photos violates no legal right of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 05:08 AM Response to Reply #149 |
158. I can't tell if you're sparring or want a lecture, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 09:18 AM Response to Reply #158 |
160. i think if this was a white house photographer. there is no violation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 07:35 PM Response to Reply #160 |
169. Getting closer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:54 AM Response to Reply #116 |
144. Couple of differences. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kurtzapril4
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 02:02 PM Response to Reply #81 |
90. + 2 brazillion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
86. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsPithy
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
91. Many of you have commented on the misogynist similarities |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saras
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 01:07 AM Response to Reply #91 |
126. Best signal-noise ratio in the whole thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cherchez la Femme
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
95. Well well, THIS was sure yanked from the front page quickly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mosby
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #95 |
109. Yeah, you gotta laugh alright |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aj_cd
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:27 PM Response to Reply #95 |
110. completly confused |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
107. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
111. What pathetic idiocy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suffragette
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
119. Erasing them from history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus
![]() |
Mon May-09-11 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
124. Yet, child molestation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saras
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 12:50 AM Response to Reply #124 |
125. Of course, child molestation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 01:26 AM Response to Reply #124 |
127. Anything resembling proof of your assertions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 01:47 AM Response to Reply #127 |
129. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:07 AM Response to Reply #129 |
130. It doesn't prove the other person's assertions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:44 AM Response to Reply #130 |
139. No, it doesn't prove their assertions, however... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:47 AM Response to Reply #139 |
140. Do you understand the concept of "burden of proof?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:57 AM Response to Reply #140 |
145. I'm trying to point out that such proof is easy to generate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 03:17 AM Response to Reply #145 |
148. If no absolute truth, then don't represent it as "fact." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 05:02 AM Response to Reply #148 |
157. If truth is relative.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:37 AM Response to Reply #127 |
133. Are you talking numbers or percentages? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:42 AM Response to Reply #133 |
137. I didn't make the claim. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 04:32 AM Response to Reply #137 |
152. Your post is the one that prompted my question, though. You posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 04:49 AM Response to Reply #152 |
154. You were unclear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nihil
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 08:59 PM Response to Reply #154 |
170. Oops. The facts buggered that approach didn't they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 11:57 AM Response to Reply #127 |
162. You could google it -- you'd get 132,000 results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 01:48 PM Response to Reply #162 |
163. That is not proof. Sorry. Try again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gtar100
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 01:36 AM Response to Original message |
128. For God's sake, grow up you religious zealots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matilda
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:38 AM Response to Original message |
135. The paper has now apologised. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 03:01 AM Response to Reply #135 |
147. Yeah, and the Taliban put women in burqua as a sign of respect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 04:51 AM Response to Reply #135 |
155. No, it's a lie; and a lie is worse than "no comment." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sakabatou
![]() |
Tue May-10-11 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
165. As a Jew myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC