|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
bananas
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 09:40 AM Original message |
Nuclear meltdown at Fukushima plant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xipe Totec
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
1. China Syndrome nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
some guy
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:15 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. There should be a different name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neoralme
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:30 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. In what could be the vector that will change or even end life on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
some guy
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
116. No reason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Martin Eden
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. Core Syndrome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
some guy
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:09 PM Response to Reply #22 |
113. I think I like this best. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:30 PM Response to Reply #11 |
25. Yeah and Lou Gehrig's disease has affected to people other than Lou Gehrig... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChadwickHenryWard
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:55 PM Response to Reply #25 |
36. That's a fundamental failure to understand the phenomenon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:29 PM Response to Reply #36 |
99. It might hit a strata of water, in which an explosive geyser would erupt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:41 PM Response to Reply #99 |
267. Yes, because that would be totally worse than what happened at Chernobyl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:34 PM Response to Reply #36 |
100. So what you're trying to say is that you did not understand my point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 05:59 PM Response to Reply #25 |
272. Actually they have a better chance there of going |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChadwickHenryWard
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:34 PM Response to Reply #11 |
29. The antipode of Tokyo, Japan, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:52 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. Antipode, schmantipode. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChadwickHenryWard
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:57 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. How about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:15 PM Response to Reply #40 |
115. Of course it translates to Japanese. Their word is Fukushima. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 06:45 PM Response to Reply #115 |
126. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:58 PM Response to Reply #29 |
41. Wow, that's a cool website! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:00 PM Response to Reply #29 |
94. Thank you for that website reference - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:49 PM Response to Reply #11 |
34. The Omaha Syndrome? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:07 PM Response to Reply #34 |
48. Automatic spell checkers will change that to Obama Syndrome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:12 PM Response to Reply #48 |
69. Amarillo Syndrome? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:56 PM Response to Reply #11 |
37. Ohio Syndrome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace4ever
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:59 PM Response to Reply #11 |
42. Meltdown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:07 PM Response to Reply #11 |
49. I call it a big fat fucking mess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
89. The Rio Syndrome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:48 PM Response to Reply #89 |
107. You mean they're covering it in Da Newz? I thought Da Newz was all about Gingrich. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SkyDaddy7
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:07 PM Response to Reply #89 |
112. No, actually antipode of Fukushima, Japan is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
90. I propose we call it "The Minnesota Syndrome" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
120. "as bad as the doom-n-gloomers were saying it would" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drew Richards
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 06:13 PM Response to Reply #11 |
123. How about "The Truth of Nuclear Power" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 06:31 PM Response to Reply #11 |
125. Anyone who did their research... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dennis Donovan
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 06:12 AM Response to Reply #11 |
234. The Crawford TX syndrome? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 09:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
164. Japan Syndrome would be more accurate. Tsunami Syndrome even more so. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
2. NOW the company is worried...????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Art_from_Ark
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 01:32 AM Response to Reply #2 |
279. Let's put some things into perspective here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
3. Unanswered question: Do they have a concrete catchment underneath or not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:05 PM Response to Reply #3 |
20. Tepco is refusing to answer that question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
makhno
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:29 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Lots of obfuscation surrounding this accident |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corkhead
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:16 PM Response to Reply #23 |
55. Union Carbide wrote the book on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:01 PM Response to Reply #23 |
109. Yeah, there is a LOT of "under-estimating" from the officials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 06:00 PM Original message |
5/13 = 100%? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
38. There should be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
makhno
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:16 PM Response to Reply #38 |
54. The company won't spontaneously do the right thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SkyDaddy7
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:14 PM Response to Reply #54 |
114. I totally agree! This is a shame! nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lfairban
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 09:17 PM Response to Reply #38 |
162. There, now, as it was here, then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
4. Kicked and recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
5. This will take decades to "resolve" - if it can be resolved at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neoralme
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:32 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Under existing technology it cannot be resolved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:24 PM Response to Reply #13 |
70. Yes it can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Courtesy Flush
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:41 PM Response to Reply #70 |
78. There was no meltdown at TML |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:58 PM Response to Reply #78 |
82. Yes there was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:45 PM Response to Reply #82 |
105. There are meltdowns, and then there are meltdowns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:03 PM Response to Reply #105 |
110. That's why the term is generally not used in scientific circles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:08 PM Response to Reply #110 |
129. "Technically any fuel melting is a meltdown..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Art_from_Ark
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 07:55 AM Response to Reply #129 |
236. According to Asahi TV News, it was not a core meltdown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:48 PM Response to Reply #236 |
242. A breach in the containment vessel usually precedes a full meltdown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Art_from_Ark
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 09:25 AM Response to Reply #242 |
282. How can you say that a "breach in the containment vessel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Throckmorton
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:01 PM Response to Reply #78 |
84. Yes, there was a melt down at TMI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:40 PM Response to Reply #78 |
101. Yes, TMI partially melted down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neoralme
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:50 PM Response to Reply #70 |
80. Three Mile Island? Surely you jest. Not remotely in the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:59 PM Response to Reply #80 |
83. Both are meltdowns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
makhno
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:46 PM Response to Reply #83 |
92. Indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:17 PM Response to Reply #92 |
95. TEPCO is doing a lot about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:44 PM Response to Reply #95 |
103. Ah, so that makes it OK and stuff then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:42 PM Response to Reply #103 |
268. I think it's interesting to see people shitting on TEPCO for taking a step that will reduce radiatio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
makhno
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:42 AM Response to Reply #95 |
232. I've no doubt they're trying to do something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:43 PM Response to Reply #83 |
102. No longer comparable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chervilant
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 07:55 AM Response to Reply #70 |
280. hmm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greenman3610
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
6. Germany and Japan declare non-nuclear futures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mountainlion55
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:10 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Sorry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladywnch
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:34 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. actually, one was just born the other day, ..... I think in Japan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace4ever
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Two-headed baby born in China (video) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
N_E_1 for Tennis
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:44 PM Response to Reply #21 |
33. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace4ever
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:57 PM Response to Reply #33 |
39. Abigail and Brittany Hensel born in the US in 1990 are leading very productive lives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:14 PM Response to Reply #39 |
52. My goodness, they're lovely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace4ever
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:16 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. aren't they! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:59 PM Response to Reply #33 |
43. It's up to the parents to try. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:04 PM Response to Reply #33 |
45. They could have only brought that pregnancy to term by KNOWING about it --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace4ever
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:06 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. they did not know about it until just before the due date |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:12 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. So she had pre-natal care -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:38 PM Response to Reply #33 |
66. deleted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:46 PM Response to Reply #33 |
106. There is a set of cojoined twins like this in MN. They are very nice girls, here's a link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace4ever
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:14 PM Response to Reply #21 |
53. Two ultra sound scans in September and February failed to reveal the two heads because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:37 PM Response to Reply #53 |
64. Something a midwife would have figured out, but two electronic scans couldn't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:45 PM Response to Reply #64 |
104. Why do you think a midwife would have figured it out? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:27 PM Response to Reply #104 |
136. Because they would have FELT two heads and only one body .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:40 PM Response to Reply #136 |
161. I guess the lesson is: don't rely too much on technology. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:18 PM Response to Reply #104 |
149. If you've ever been pregnant you know you can feel parts of the baby's body |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:20 PM Response to Reply #149 |
150. I wonder why the mother never felt her own stomach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:20 PM Response to Reply #150 |
153. True -- maybe she thought she was having twins? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:44 PM Response to Reply #153 |
269. You realize people have gone into labor not previously knowing they were pregnant at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:48 PM Response to Reply #21 |
108. And this is related to Fukushima nuke plant meltdown...how? Or are you saying that there already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:28 PM Response to Reply #108 |
137. Radiation = DNA damage -- See Iraq -- Depleted Uranium --- and PLUTONIUM at Fuku-!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:34 PM Response to Reply #137 |
141. I really doubt this co-joined twin became that way from Fukushima |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:48 PM Response to Reply #141 |
146. No one said that -- HOWEVER, radiation creates a fear of DNA damage and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:56 PM Response to Reply #146 |
147. That is why I was asking the poster @beginning of this subthread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:15 PM Response to Reply #147 |
148. And what did the poster say in reply to you ... ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:20 PM Response to Reply #148 |
151. Well, looking at the thread, he/she hasn't replied. Only you have. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:22 PM Response to Reply #151 |
154. True -- and the reason they didn't reply is because it was a silly quesiton .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:29 PM Response to Reply #154 |
158. Are you saying you are peace4ever or can read her/his mind? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 09:23 PM Response to Reply #158 |
163. I'm saying ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:26 PM Response to Reply #163 |
165. Asking for clarification is silly. Gotcha. Bye |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarsInHerHair
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:37 AM Response to Reply #9 |
168. sounds like an excuse to not take the road out of this mess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
makhno
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
44. Not sure how I feel about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace4ever
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:04 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. 3 things to think about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:14 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. Larger question is the one effecting us all -- what do we do about this level of insanity .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:28 PM Response to Reply #46 |
71. Waste is recyclable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nc4bo
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:48 PM Response to Reply #71 |
79. Are you referring to thorium reactors? Has one actually been built yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:02 PM Response to Reply #79 |
85. India has a Thorium reactor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nc4bo
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:37 PM Response to Reply #85 |
91. Yea ok - you like playing Russian Roulette, I don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:24 PM Response to Reply #91 |
96. Every energy source is Russian Roulette |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:30 PM Response to Reply #96 |
140. Solar and Wind are "Russian Roulette" ..... ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:20 PM Response to Reply #140 |
152. Deleted message |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:30 PM Response to Reply #152 |
159. Yes ... I know --- and agree with you 1000% --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:48 PM Response to Reply #140 |
270. At some level of scope and scale, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:25 PM Response to Reply #85 |
155. What nuclear gets in guarantees is HUGE because these plants couldn't be built w/o government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace4ever
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:57 PM Response to Reply #71 |
81. no it isn't - it is a million year problem that still doesn't have a solution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:08 PM Response to Reply #81 |
86. Thorium Reactors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:29 PM Response to Reply #86 |
98. Deleted message |
peace4ever
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:12 PM Response to Reply #86 |
131. Solar Thermal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:25 PM Response to Reply #131 |
133. India's Kakrapar-1 is already running |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:52 PM Response to Reply #133 |
243. Kakrapar-1 is a test reactor nowhere near production or deployment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:19 PM Response to Reply #86 |
132. "You're not going to power the nation of Japan with rooftop solar and wind farms, sorry" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonperson
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:35 PM Response to Reply #132 |
142. If the money wasted on nuclear had been spent on renewable energy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:38 PM Response to Reply #132 |
143. Anything is cheaper than destruction of the Pacific Ocean and 1/3rd of Japan -- !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:50 PM Response to Reply #143 |
271. The entire Fukushima Dai-ichi plant could be lost to the depths of the sea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:30 PM Response to Reply #71 |
138. Unless we are 100% suicidal and want to junk the planet, we will depart from nuclear --!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
a simple pattern
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 06:46 PM Response to Reply #46 |
127. +24,100 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:16 PM Response to Reply #44 |
57. Answer is to vote for humanity and the planet and close it all down ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abelenkpe
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:25 PM Response to Reply #6 |
134. Wish we would join them :) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mountainlion55
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
7. WTF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
8. We're Totally Fuku'ed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pmorlan1
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
10. Truth leaking out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReturnoftheDjedi
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:44 AM Response to Original message |
15. FBag doesn't have enough fingers for this dyke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
16. No New Nukes in Georgia, Mr. President! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:34 PM Response to Reply #16 |
28. He can't hear you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:52 PM Response to Reply #16 |
93. Don't want any old nukes in VT either. Close the damn place down! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bennyboy
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
17. Check out these photos of Fukushima taken Tuesday... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:47 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Wow! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Safetykitten
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:51 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. OMG. Was that tank twisted? Also still plenty of smoke/steam. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barbtries
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:36 PM Response to Reply #17 |
30. amazing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:25 PM Response to Reply #17 |
97. It's almost like it got hit by a Tsunami/Earthquake! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barbtries
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
24. this is not really news right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:36 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Tepco probably knew when the reactor blew back on day three or four |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:35 PM Response to Reply #31 |
63. PRIVATE corporations will act in their own interests -- not for humanity/planet -- !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raschel
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:38 PM Response to Reply #24 |
65. What DOES this mean, for Japan, for the world? And why was last week the first time they decided to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:41 PM Response to Reply #65 |
67. They couldn't get in there due to the radiation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barbtries
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:33 PM Response to Reply #65 |
73. what i think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:27 PM Response to Reply #73 |
156. They couldn't be hiding this w/o complicity of Japanese government -- and maybe US? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raschel
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:37 PM Response to Reply #65 |
75. To clarify, what does this mean as far as radiation effects, for us and Japan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:26 PM Response to Reply #75 |
87. That means that serious radiation has been leaking into Japan's ground water |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raschel
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:33 PM Response to Reply #87 |
117. Thank you Robbien. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:09 PM Response to Reply #87 |
130. Fukushima is right next to the ocean, how did it manage to get to the ground water exactly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:28 PM Response to Reply #75 |
157. TONS of radiated water has been dumped into Pacific Ocean --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
26. Before all this there was a 'nukes aren't dangerous' faction here on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:38 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. Are you kidding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:19 PM Response to Reply #32 |
59. Remember Obama is pushing nuclear reactors in US!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:28 PM Response to Reply #26 |
61. They're still here -- and so is Obama -- !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taft_Bathtub
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:29 PM Response to Reply #26 |
72. Most of them got sick of deal with the eyerollingly bad nuke hysteria |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:40 PM Response to Reply #72 |
144. America needs renewable energy which doesn't sicken the population --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 06:03 PM Response to Reply #72 |
274. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raschel
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:35 PM Response to Reply #26 |
74. I dunno. But there were people on here who didn't even want us discussing it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barbtries
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:40 PM Response to Reply #26 |
76. there's one on this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chervilant
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:56 PM Response to Reply #26 |
119. hmm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:49 PM Response to Reply #119 |
275. Perhaps they volunteered to help stabilize the reactors in Japan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:41 AM Response to Reply #26 |
238. We are still here. Certainly rethinking a nuclear approach now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:51 PM Response to Reply #238 |
276. There are simple safer alternatives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 08:37 PM Response to Reply #276 |
286. Works for me. They can use as much of my tax dollars on that as they wish. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:19 AM Response to Reply #26 |
239. Dunno. Maybe to Spin and Marketing to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:53 PM Response to Reply #239 |
277. They can take this knowlege and..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeglow3
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
27. In other news, the moon only reflects light from the sun... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
58. here's what they actually said: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:33 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. This is another reason why we can't have PRIVATE industry in charge of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:07 PM Response to Reply #62 |
68. you're saying the nhk article is spin & the telegraph is giving you the straight story? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:33 PM Response to Reply #68 |
160. I'm saying common sense makes clear that nuclear is suicidal --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:30 PM Response to Reply #58 |
139. Only 55% melted down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:25 AM Response to Reply #58 |
230. Context: "end of last week" vs "Previously" vs "Now" and "Thursday morning" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nilram
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
60. suPRISE, suPRISE, suPRISE!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trud
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
77. once again, old news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chervilant
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 06:03 PM Response to Reply #77 |
122. Really, trud? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
88. Oh man... :( |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
111. Death score card: Tsunami:20,000, Fukushima:?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Corruption Winz
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
118. As mentioned in another post.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chervilant
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 06:15 PM Response to Reply #118 |
124. Well, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 06:50 PM Response to Reply #124 |
128. ...and this is why the information from TEPCO...and from... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:26 PM Response to Reply #128 |
135. TEPCO isn't the only one making money here. Doom and gloom sells news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:43 PM Response to Reply #135 |
145. So there's no such thing as truth, you say? Only, perhaps, truth that some don't like? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #145 |
245. No what is inane is doomer BS and media hype. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harmony Blue
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:40 PM Response to Reply #135 |
166. Given that the coverage of Japan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:41 AM Response to Reply #135 |
231. The media has plenty to report on to make $, TEPCO can only gain from disinformation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chervilant
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 08:16 AM Response to Reply #231 |
237. Yes, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
121. Interesting. Nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:37 AM Response to Original message |
167. The DOE says wind is cheaper. There is no longer a rational reason to build nukes. (chart) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avant Guardian
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:55 PM Response to Reply #167 |
278. Mandate solar panels on all rooftops by 2025 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:08 AM Response to Original message |
169. Fukushima Reactor Has a Hole, Leading to Leakage ("Disaster Worse Than Previously Disclosed") |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:08 AM Response to Reply #169 |
170. Fuku'ed and Recommended! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:08 AM Response to Reply #169 |
171. "There must be a large leak" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #171 |
195. That comment does not evoke confidence in Matsumoto or his peers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:08 AM Response to Reply #169 |
172. Why did the world allow them to put those nuclear plants on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lob1
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:08 AM Response to Reply #172 |
174. We have 2 nuclear plants on fault lines in California, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #174 |
175. It's time to rectify this stupidity. Before it corrects itself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lob1
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #175 |
176. I couldn't agree more. But, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #176 |
202. Humans will be extinct soon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #174 |
207. A map for you: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #172 |
178. Privatize Profits, Socialize Costs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atypical Liberal
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #178 |
196. Bingo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
subterranean
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #172 |
215. They weren't on a fault line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:08 AM Response to Reply #169 |
173. x-post: "we have harnessed the power of the sun..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IScreamSundays
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #169 |
177. This has been the story since the beginning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #177 |
179. Because people might panic!!!!! if they were told the truth..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snagglepuss
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #179 |
186. I wonder what mass panic as they imagine it would look like. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chervilant
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #177 |
182. SOME |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #182 |
187. I'm beginning to think that's the good scenario. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #169 |
180. No One Could Have Possibly Predicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chervilant
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #180 |
183. And, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #169 |
181. DU must have collective ESP. How did so many of us here know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #181 |
191. Third graders would know -- why not us? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Devil_Fish
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #181 |
208. It doesn't take much critical thinking to know what happens when you loose cooling water. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #169 |
184. I got news for ya;ll ...all 6 of them are melting down and they can't tell anyone because.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #184 |
185. Oh, Japan will still be there, glowing faintly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #184 |
189. Ya, I'm kind of the same mind on that. I just think it's "only" 3-4 of them in meltdown. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #184 |
192. ... and spewing radiation reaching ALL of us -- and melting down into Pacific which everyone on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atypical Liberal
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #184 |
197. Isn't this a bit fear-mongering? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReturnoftheDjedi
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #197 |
199. This is much worse on the long-term scale than the WWII Nukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #199 |
210. What about all the naval reactors, plutonium torpedoes, and warheads lost at sea by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebenaube
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #197 |
205. Still don't comprehend the difference between a flash and a beam eh? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
plumbob
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #197 |
211. See, the atomic bombs stopped after a bit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 06:02 PM Response to Reply #211 |
273. Tepco is trying to stop that cutting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReturnoftheDjedi
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #184 |
198. my wife and I thought about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downwinder
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #184 |
203. Gives us a time frame to work with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prometheus Bound
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #169 |
188. Let's be honest. They lied! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #188 |
193. The governments are probably also hiding the truth -- didn't US have "advisors" there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #193 |
204. My dosimeter says yes, they're lying to us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #169 |
190. PRIVATE companies and fossil fuels/atomic reactors -- have be outted from energy -- !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #169 |
194. I was afraid of this, but I was hoping that it wasn't so for Japans sake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #169 |
200. Great, if they're admitting this much, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harmony Blue
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #200 |
209. Worse than Chernobyl for sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FourScore
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #169 |
201. No shit Sherlock! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #169 |
206. I'm not surprised. And here I thought republicans were incompetent liars. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Overseas
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #169 |
212. K&R. No more nuclear power please! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarsInHerHair
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #169 |
213. worse than previously disclosed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #169 |
214. The DOE says wind is cheaper. There is no longer a rational reason to build nukes. (chart) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:10 AM Response to Original message |
216. Kan orders slaughter of all livestock in 20-km hot zone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:10 AM Response to Reply #216 |
217. Kicked and recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:10 AM Response to Reply #216 |
218. This is so incredibly heart breaking.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sasha031
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:10 AM Response to Reply #218 |
219. thank you for your compassionate post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kdillard
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:10 AM Response to Reply #218 |
221. Very well stated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:10 AM Response to Reply #216 |
220. I think we are witnessing an epic event. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:10 AM Response to Reply #216 |
222. It just keeps getting worse. Greenpeace has found serious contamination in Japan's seaweed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bread_and_roses
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:10 AM Response to Reply #216 |
223. Wasn't the evacuation zone declared almost three weeks ago? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:10 AM Response to Reply #223 |
224. Animals are wandering around, mostly, those that could wander. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:10 AM Response to Reply #216 |
225. You know there is a good question here. Why did they not get these |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
on point
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:10 AM Response to Reply #225 |
226. They would have been a total loss even if moved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:10 AM Response to Reply #226 |
227. Okay, that I understand. I was assuming that the animals had not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:43 AM Response to Reply #225 |
233. Because it was a goddamned tsunami. Hell, they didn't get all the people out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cambie
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:10 AM Response to Reply #216 |
228. As it was at Chernobyl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prometheus Bound
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:44 AM Response to Original message |
229. The amount of cesium and iodine flowing into the Pacific is truly frightening. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnyCanuck
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 06:24 AM Response to Original message |
235. Fuck nuclear power. Fuck it in hell. That is where it came from. Let it go back there. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mountainlion55
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
240. Thank you for the post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
241. But wait...all the pro-nuke folks said this didn't happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nc4bo
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:47 PM Response to Reply #241 |
244. They're around... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chervilant
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 09:25 AM Response to Reply #241 |
281. Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
246. Nuclear Fuel Meltdown at Fukushima Daiichi Confirmed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:15 PM Response to Reply #246 |
247. China Syndrome type level? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #247 |
250. What would make this a level 8? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #250 |
253. Depends on the amount of radiation it releases now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #253 |
256. anyone thinking this won't have global consequences |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #256 |
258. Like Chernobyl,distance is your friend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #258 |
259. exactly.... and it will effect trade, policies, the environment, people, etc |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #259 |
261. On the bright side... globalization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #261 |
264. you raise an interesting point there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:17 PM Response to Reply #264 |
266. Peak oil will do it too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #256 |
260. Right now I really worry about Japan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #260 |
262. oh man... I send you and your friends all the good vibes I can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chervilant
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 09:26 AM Response to Reply #256 |
283. Or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #250 |
255. At this point it is based upon total radiation release. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #247 |
252. What about L-7 PER REACTOR? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #252 |
254. This is really bad news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #254 |
257. And... in the bread basket of the country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #246 |
248. Gotta preserve the nuke biz at all costs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #246 |
249. too many fat cats are invested in nuclear energy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #246 |
251. Don't worry: it can't possibly be a China Syndrome -- given Japan's global location. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #251 |
265. Somewhere far off the coast of Argentina or Uruguay, to pursue a flight of fancy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 10:52 AM Response to Reply #265 |
284. Montevidean malaise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stuart G
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #246 |
263. k & r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
285. kr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC