|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
alp227
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:19 PM Original message |
Ex-WikiLeaks spokesman criticises Assange's gagging order for staff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. "behaving too much like the governments and businesses it purports to expose" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Wikileaks/Assange took in 3.4 million in 2010. Manning got 15k of that. I'd call that fucking over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 09:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. I'm grateful that Wikileaks put corrupt governments all over the world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJvR
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:04 AM Response to Reply #8 |
34. I wonder how much... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. Hmm...the thot plickens. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:28 AM Response to Reply #2 |
39. Not really. "What’s Really in the Leaked WikiLeaks Confidentiality Agreement?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
3. Since It's for Their Own Safety, Literally, and No Exaggeration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bodhi BloodWave
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:51 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. so one set of rules for wikileaks and another set for the rest? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cstanleytech
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. There are some differences though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Wikileaks isn't a for-profit corporation? Can you prove that? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
45. ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohbill
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Assange didn't protect Manning before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:39 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. How could he have protected Assange. He claims he didn't really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. See post 8 above. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohbill
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NavyDem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
22. Private First Class, NOT Corporal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 07:23 AM Response to Reply #22 |
35. A female officer. Hit her in the face. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NavyDem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:27 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. I knew it was a senior |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zalinda
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
12. When you are dealing with such sensitive information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:04 AM Response to Reply #12 |
24. "The Pentagon has said that nothing Assange released put anyone's life at risk " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:26 AM Response to Reply #24 |
37. No one has come up with any evidence that anyone has been killed because of WikiLeaks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:52 AM Response to Reply #37 |
42. Careful. Charles Manson has a cult following too. How do we know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:59 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. You are embarrassing yourself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:10 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Thank you Cenk. Right back atcha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bodhi BloodWave
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:35 AM Response to Reply #12 |
40. sooo pretty much what the us government was doing with their information before it was stolen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
14. to his dis-credit, the only way Domscheit-Berg can get attention is to attack Assange. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reorg
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
15. Mr Domschit has become what I despise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
16. Oh, this is just too delicious. You mean Assange has "secrets" he doesn't want exposed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Assange is not a government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:09 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. So, some secrets are sacred? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:10 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Nothing is sacred. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:15 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. "Nothing is sacred"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:19 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Your word. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:38 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Whatever you say. Does anyone know where Julians' funds come from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reorg
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:17 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. the Wau Holland foundation recently published their financial report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. You don't, but then I'm not suspected of stealing government secrets either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reorg
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:43 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Wikileaks didn't steal anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:51 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Thank you Julian... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reorg
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:58 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Ugh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:24 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. "Law & Order zealots"? Hardly, but I sure wanna see this mofo's ass fried. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:23 AM Response to Reply #31 |
36. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:46 AM Response to Reply #36 |
41. There was never an argument to lose. He's a perv, plain & simple. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:57 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Stupidest post ever on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:42 PM Response to Reply #41 |
48. By the way, you don't know shit about me or my principles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:06 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Testy! Testy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 05:24 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Amnesty International, famous for their cult-iness and defense of Jim Jones figures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reorg
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:15 AM Response to Reply #20 |
25. whose own life is "shrouded in secrecy"? LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:33 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Oh that's right. He's the suspected rape artist. That the one you mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reorg
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:45 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. somehow I knew that this is where you wanted to go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
47. "What’s Really in the Leaked WikiLeaks Confidentiality Agreement?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleko
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:23 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. Finally, an author who understands the legal jargon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC