|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
gaijinlaw
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 08:52 AM Original message |
Ind. court: No right to resist 'unlawful police entry' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebenaube
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
1. Bullshit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cstanleytech
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:37 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. No, not really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
29. Yes, really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
djg21
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:01 PM Response to Reply #29 |
43. Nonsense! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:13 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. LOL... like an average citizen has any chance of redress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cstanleytech
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:47 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. "like an average citizen has any chance of redress" They do and they have. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:25 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. Uh, that was a massively high profile case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cstanleytech
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:55 PM Response to Reply #52 |
59. "lost everything"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:57 PM Response to Reply #59 |
72. Is it your position... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:20 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. About the same chance to resist... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:26 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Not if we don't allow crap like this law to stand, but otherwise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 06:37 PM Response to Reply #43 |
64. Why is it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gaijinlaw
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 12:07 PM Response to Reply #64 |
84. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cstanleytech
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:55 PM Response to Reply #29 |
48. As djg21 said "Nonsense" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 06:39 PM Response to Reply #48 |
65. That line of reasoning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cstanleytech
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 07:45 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. You might want to read the amendment you quoted then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 08:58 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. I never claimed it did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cstanleytech
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:13 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. You were the one who brought it up when it doesnt apply in this type of case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:55 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. The problem... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cstanleytech
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 07:17 AM Response to Reply #71 |
73. Deathly afraid of the consequences? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 10:05 AM Response to Reply #73 |
77. Reading is fundamental... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cstanleytech
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 10:58 AM Response to Reply #77 |
79. If the police violate your rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gaijinlaw
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 12:04 PM Response to Reply #79 |
83. I'm curious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cstanleytech
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 03:45 PM Response to Reply #83 |
88. I can imagine some reasons in theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBGLuthier
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
2. criminalizing the 4th amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:02 AM Response to Original message |
3. Exigent circumstances have been allowed in the past |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:57 AM Response to Reply #3 |
11. It sounds like a overbroad ruling --same court also allowed 'no-knock' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tafiti
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:08 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
4. "modern Fourth Amendment" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:18 AM Response to Reply #4 |
17. wait...an *activist* judge??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thanks_imjustlurking
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 09:01 AM Response to Reply #4 |
75. My first thought exactly. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
plumbob
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
5. Not even surprised. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downwinder
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
6. Activist liberal courts. In case of rape you can't say NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izquierdista
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
8. Land of the free |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
9. Making it easier for corrupt cops to clean up resistance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mountainlion55
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
10. The brown shirts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
left on green only
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 01:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
86. This contributor speaks the truth! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daggahead
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
12. Wow ... they just took a big crap on the 4th Amendment. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
13. That's you small government conservatives for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
14. Here is the Actual Opinion, Please note this is a CRIMINAL Case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gaijinlaw
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:22 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Confu?ed by your subject line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:24 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Sorry, I correct not to Note, AND added the paragraph from the court Opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gaijinlaw
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:46 PM Response to Reply #19 |
46. Summon the shire reeve! Wake the beadle!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fuddnik
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
16. The fourth amendment is a myth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gaijinlaw
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:25 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Pretty sure it isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fuddnik
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:46 AM Response to Reply #20 |
27. The courts have made so many exceptions to it, it's meaningless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:30 AM Response to Reply #16 |
23. Read the case, the Court decision is correct, given the facts of the case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gaijinlaw
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:57 AM Response to Reply #23 |
31. I'm less concerned with the facts of this particular case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:04 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. You agreed with the dissent, that the decision is to broad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gaijinlaw
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:12 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Clarify please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:50 PM Response to Reply #33 |
42. The dispute is, should the common law right to resist arrest be abolished or just modified |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:12 PM Response to Reply #16 |
39. just like vampyres |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
21. How could you possibly expect a court to rule otherwise? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gaijinlaw
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:48 AM Response to Reply #21 |
28. The Fourth Amendment and legal precedent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:22 AM Response to Reply #28 |
34. That decision is 111 years old. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gaijinlaw
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:29 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Two things: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:32 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. They get pruned, trimmed, tailored to fit an evolving society. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ret5hd
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:42 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. How come rights always seem to get "pruned" or "trimmed" but never fertilized? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:56 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. Because the lowest common denominator among us can do a lot of harm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MicaelS
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:37 PM Response to Reply #49 |
57. You really are an Authoritarian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:13 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. Hey, I didn't make the world. I just explain it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mountainlion55
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 07:53 AM Response to Reply #60 |
74. Disagree 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 02:15 PM Response to Reply #60 |
87. And I'm sure you'd like nothing better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cstanleytech
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:03 PM Response to Reply #45 |
50. BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
22. Someone is going to get shot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamthebandfanman
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:31 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. that what its going to take.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:34 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. That is what the Police were trying to prevent when they entered the house |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
26. This doesn't seem surprising or unusual to me .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
30. And the Police State marches on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evoman
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
37. As one of the biggest cop haters and anti-authoritarians on DU, this bothers me little. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RantinRavin
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:06 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. You are exactly correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ret5hd
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:28 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. You are correct. Nothing prevents you from spending tens of thousands of dollars hiring a lawyer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
makhno
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 10:27 AM Response to Reply #40 |
78. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heywood J
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #38 |
70. Except for the fact that now they know what they're looking for , |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:49 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Except I think there have been recent rulings on evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sofa king
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 05:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
63. Which means "I heard a toilet flush" will be cause for entry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoeyTrib
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 11:11 AM Response to Reply #41 |
80. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
54. that's way out of line.... no way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tclambert
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
55. What constitutes "resistance?" Refusing to unlock the door? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
24601
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
56. Next stop - federal courts and we'll see, if just perhaps, the U.S. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
58. OK, so the new thing for criminals will be to say they are police, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cstanleytech
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:38 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. Criminals have been pretending to be the good guys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
61. BULLSHIT! The Pigs can kiss my ass! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unkachuck
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
67. we have.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
76. Fuck that noise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoeyTrib
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
81. I agree with the dissenting opinion on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 12:32 PM Response to Reply #81 |
85. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian
![]() |
Sat May-14-11 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
82. If the police want to come in they need to get a warrant. If they want to search you or your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC