Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Signs Patriot Act Extension With Autopen

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 11:24 PM
Original message
Obama Signs Patriot Act Extension With Autopen
Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON — Congress on Thursday passed a four-year extension of post-Sept. 11 powers to search records and conduct roving wiretaps in pursuit of terrorists. Votes taken in rapid succession in the Senate and House came after lawmakers rejected attempts to temper the law enforcement powers to ensure that individual liberties are not abused.

Following the 250-153 evening vote in the House, the legislation to renew three terrorism-fighting authorities headed for the president's signature with only hours to go before the provisions expire at midnight.

With Obama currently in France, the White House said the president would use an autopen machine that holds a pen and signs his actual signature. It is only used with proper authorization of the president. Minutes before the midnight deadline, the White House said Obama had signed the bill.

A short-term expiration would not interrupt ongoing operations but would bar the government from seeking warrants for new investigations.

MORE...

Read more: http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/obama-signs-patriot-act-957694.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SugarShack Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
1.  Ah...the hopey changey thing is not really coming to the USA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bush/Cheney march on under a new name in these matters. what's in it for Obama? hmm nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. It gets domestic terrorists like the Times Square bomber arrested before blowing up people.
Edited on Fri May-27-11 12:08 AM by ClarkUSA
Your bullshit Bush = Obama equivalence is ludicrous, as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. Disposable, untrackable, cellphones are not an essential liberty to me.
Perhaps you can convince me otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #20
45. What about disposable, untrackable pen and paper?
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #45
57. Should a separate warrant be needed for each pen and paper document?
Roving wiretaps are about tapping multiple phones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andlor Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
40. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
43. Some DUers are much smarter
than Benjamin Franklin, didn't you know? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. No it doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. I agree with your first and fourth points, but your seventh gives me pause.
Oh, wait, you didn't actually make any points.

Or offer any text to move the discussion forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #21
55. The poster made a valid point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
66. The facts are on my side. The Patriot Act enabled cops to arrest the TSB. See Reply #64 (link) ->
Edited on Fri May-27-11 05:55 PM by ClarkUSA
Reply 64: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=4864860&mesg_id=4865685

There have been numerous other domestic terrorism plots that have been disrupted via The Patriot Act. Furthermore, unlike BushCo, the Obama administration is getting permission from the FISA court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DesMoinesDem Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #7
47. The Patriot Act had absolutely nothing to do with stopping the Times Square bomber.
People on the street saw smoke coming from the car.

Your example = EPIC FAIL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #47
60. Hey DesMoinesDem!
Welcome to DU from another Iowan. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #47
64. Wrong. The Patriot Act allowed police to locate and arrest him.
Edited on Fri May-27-11 05:48 PM by ClarkUSA
"The vehicle identification number had been removed from the bomb-laden 1993 Nissan Pathfinder left in Times Square. But investigators were able to lift it from a second location on the vehicle, and used that to track down a Connecticut man who said he had sold the Pathfinder for cash about three weeks ago.

The man had offered the vehicle on Craigslist, and FBI agents were able to recover the number from a disposable cellphone that had been used by the buyer."

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/36738.html

After capture, the guy sang like a bird. Presumably, those who are railing against the Patriot Act are not against capturing terrorists, I hope?

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
62. LOL
I've never done this before, but I googled your username and the Patriot Act on DU and found a few places where you had a very different perspective on the Patriot Act and the politicians who supported it back in 2007. It was pretty funny.

Just thought I'd mention it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. Unlike BushCo, the Obama administration have no problems going to the FISA court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
34. Sarah Slime
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
63. That 'hopey-changey' thing is getting old, dontcha think?
Especially since the person who coined it is a foaming RW whackjob.

It wasn't cute (or novel or creative, etc) when she said it and it hasn't improved with the subsequent 1.5 million reiterations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. .


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. What a complete fraud he turned out to be.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. PolitiFact: Obama wanted more oversight on the PATRIOT Act
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/179/revise-the-patriot-act-to-increase-oversight-on-go/

"As president, Barack Obama would revisit the PATRIOT Act to ensure that there is real and robust oversight of tools like National Security Letters, sneak-and-peek searches, and the use of the material witness provision."

Doesn't look like this renewal did so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #23
54. Sure doesn't. Nor is he fighting for any "change" in this regard.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. What were the two changes I heard that Rand Paul injected?
I heard that on the radio network today. Wonder what changes were made? Probably not enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
10.  Patriot Act Extension Signed By Obama (by machine)
Source: HuffPost

WASHINGTON — Congress on Thursday passed a four-year extension of post-Sept. 11 powers to search records and conduct roving wiretaps in pursuit of terrorists. Votes taken in rapid succession in the Senate and House came after lawmakers rejected attempts to temper the law enforcement powers to ensure that individual liberties are not abused.

Following the 250-153 evening vote in the House, the legislation to renew three terrorism-fighting authorities headed for the president's signature with only hours to go before the provisions expire at midnight.

With Obama currently in France, the White House said the president would use an autopen machine that holds a pen and signs his actual signature. It is only used with proper authorization of the president. Minutes before the midnight deadline, the White House said Obama had signed the bill.

A short-term expiration would not interrupt ongoing operations but would bar the government from seeking warrants for new investigations.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/27/patriot-act-extension-signed-obama-autopen_n_867851.html?icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl1|sec1_lnk2|66397



OK, here's the opportunity. Claim the act is invalid since it lacks a personal signature;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. how disgusting it all is, and the degree to which we were lied to in the last campaign
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. You got that right
We don't need the Patriot Act. Osama bin Laden is dead, al Qaeda is on the ropes, and there's a secular revolt in the Middle East. People there want jobs and the exile of fat cat crooks who steal everything.

But the political and bureaucratic incentive for ever more control is universally appealing and here we go again, precious rights (not perfectly enforced) sacrificed for paranoia.

I'd say that this signing is the ultimate example of "phoning it it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. 4 senators win promise of a Patriot Act hearing
Associated Press | Posted: Thursday, May 26, 2011 6:21 pm

Four Democratic senators won the promise Thursday of a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing into what they say is a secret and expansive Justice Department interpretation of the information collection the Patriot Act allows.

The criticism by Intelligence Committee members Ron Wyden of Oregon and Mark Udall of Colorado came as Congress moved to extend the government's Patriot Act powers to search records and conduct roving wiretaps.

Wyden said there is a growing gap between what the law says and what the senators call a classified interpretation of the law by the Justice Department.

Udall said his constituents "would be alarmed if they knew" how the Patriot Act was being carried out ...

http://www.stltoday.com/news/national/govt-and-politics/article_6baee878-670e-5399-99fd-e1e89f96c680.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. Ackety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scottybeamer70 Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
15. autopen?
have we sunk that low that he can't even be bothered to be present anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TimLighter Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. A bleeping autopen? Autopen? If I was writing a RW talkshow hosts
Opening monologue for tommorow I'd make sure to reference robo-signing and tele-prompters.
What are his handlers thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. The thing probably cost a million bucks.
Edited on Fri May-27-11 01:30 AM by Lasher
Could just as easily have had somebody use a rubber stamp with his signature. I've done just that back when I had to sign paychecks.

But if I were in Obama's place I would have had somebody fly the actual bill to me in Europe, if I couldn't break away from my trip there to return to the US. Then I would have vetoed the damned thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
61. His handlers run the show.
Some of them R remnants of the previous regime too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Thomas Jefferson doesn't care about people!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autopen

It's been in use by presidents since 1804.

That's 207 *years*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. but i've never heard a case where a president has signed bill with autopen
I remember that Bush left his vacation early just to sign the emergency Terri Schiavo bill. But obviously Obama can't interrupt a state visit just to sign a despicable anti-liberty law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Just because a non-story wasn't created by media doesn't mean it didn't exist.
Autopen is no biggie, this is basically yet another poutrage unrelated to anything of substance. If people don't like the bill (that Congress keeps passing), making an issue of the mechanics about how it is being "signed" is really just kind of... sad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. It's because people are too stupid to comprehend he was in France
It looks like a bunch of people on here have fallen for the RW propaganda machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. Reread the story again
He was in France. He's been in Europe for a few weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #15
48. What's wrong with autopen?
My vice president is away this week and I have had 4 or 5 urgent powers of attorney I needed to get signed, otherwise investment documents in Georgia, Mongolia, Lao PDR and Thailand weren't going to be executed, costing us thousands of dollars. But, with autopen, her secretary was able to get me the signatures I needed and it looks like everything will be signed on time. Autopen is a very helpful addition to the office as far as I'm concerned. But I imagine Freepers will be screaming that it's not a real signature and the law isn't valid, just like they scream that President Obama isn't a real natural born American citizen and not really the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #48
51. I'll tell ya something: Auto-Tune < Autopen
Obama's voice and speaking style is so elegant that auto-tune (which has butchered much modern music) would vandalize his speeches. Haha. And good point with autopen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keepCAblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
28. Most pathetic part of all...THIS is, for the most part, being ignored....
...right here on DU.

My, my what a difference a party-affiliation makes.

I remember how loud and collectively we all railed against Bush and the Rethugs when this was originally instituted. And now, with a Dem pres and Democratically-controlled Senate, the vile Patriot Act is extended and not so much as a peep from the collective DU. Just a handful of us who still remember the outrage of days (and parties) gone by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #28
56. I haven't forgotten
... and the lack of collective outrage is pretty pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tripod Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 03:37 AM
Original message
I guess that for me , it doesn't really matter.
Edited on Fri May-27-11 03:40 AM by Tripod
I'm not a terrorist. But I hate to think of my private messages, phone calls, being heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tripod Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 03:37 AM
Original message
edit
Edited on Fri May-27-11 04:07 AM by Tripod
message
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tripod Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
29. edit
Edited on Fri May-27-11 04:06 AM by Tripod
mesage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunwyn Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
30. The Patriot Act is the clearest attack on the Constitution ever enacted by this country.
Obama is wrong - period. Call me a shill, call me a troll, but it's true. And no I am not a right wing moron. I am liberal and have never voted Republican my whole life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Should a wiretap on your cell phone be invalid if you buy a new model at a store.
This is a simple question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Threedifferentones Donating Member (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Should people who complained about a policy under Bush also complain about it under a Dem?
If you had been posting here about how the PA is fine and dandy when Bush first signed it, you would have been fried. Back then, everyone here agreed the govt's ability to spy on its own citizens should be curbed, not increased.

But, now that it's Obama's turn, well maybe it's not so bad. I voted for Obama too, but I find hypocrisy gross, so I will not again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. So, wiretaps are bad, or not bad, based on who is in office?
That seems wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Threedifferentones Donating Member (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #39
67. My sarcastic post was pointing out that Obama deserves to be ridiculed for this.
Doesn't really surprise me that you didn't get it, since you are the one defending the Patriot Act...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #32
41. So it's just about new cell phones?
You mean this bit of renewed legislation is just "The New Cell-Phone Wiretap Continuation Act"?

That being so, have you any explanation why so many here at DU were opposed to this law when Bush first brought it in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twostones Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
31. The Republicans voted overwhelmingly for it. Votes:
The Senate approved the bill as part of the Small Business Reauthorization bill (S.990) by a vote of 72-23, and the House passed the bill by a vote of 250-153. The republicans voted overwhelmingly to pass the extension to the Patriot Act despite promises to limit big government. House votes were 196 republicans for and 31 against. Democrats were 54 for and 122 against. In the senate it was 41 republicans for and only 4 republicans against. It was 31 democrats for and 18 Democrats against the Extension. Bernie Sanders of vermont an independent voted against it. It looks like this is a Republican bill by the votes.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #31
52. That's a nice spin but the fact remains that a majority of Senate Democrats voted for it and it was
signed into law by a Democratic president. Both parties own the Patriot Act. But having said that I applaud the House Democratic caucus whose majority voted against the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
33. Why? Does he hate our freedoms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
37. Take note. The Party of No isn't objecting to this one
Hannity isn't outraged. Limbaugh isn't going berserk. The Right is awesomely silent.

But then, the Left is also mum.

Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
38. And he'll sign it again in four years when he wants to help the democratic
party get a lead in the race to the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
42. KNR! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
44. It's Ok if Obama does it.l
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
46. Contemptible cowardice. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
49. And this is different from Bush how?
And what about the "secret" Patriot Act Wyden revealed???

Same ol', same ol'.

Utterly disgusting when done by a Dem. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
50. when will everyone realize obama
is a fucking tool and always has been. this country has one party. the corporate party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
53. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
58. Couple this with the 'authority' to kill 'Enemies of the State' and we're all in deep doo-doo.
That is a Secret Government term d'art.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. If those in governemnt don't like you, they can call you an Enemy of the State
and have you killed. He is a Constitutional lawyer... no doubt he knows these powers can and probably will be abused. Absolutely sickening. They are setting the stage for totalitarianism... how fucking idiotic or evil. Take your pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LetTimmySmoke Donating Member (970 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
68. Problem isn't the autopen
It's what was signed with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC