|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 04:29 PM Original message |
Rep. Anthony Weiner Exploring Legal Action Over ‘Weinergate’ Fiasco |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
1. YES!YES!YES!YES!YES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChrisBorg
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. Bring the FBI in and find out who and how the account was hacked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 08:46 AM Response to Reply #2 |
66. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
3. GOOD ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoapBox
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. Go Anthony Go! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angstlessk
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. Why have I never seen the 'dirty photo'?,,,,I keep lookin but I have not seen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iliyah
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 04:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Goper hacks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nenagh
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. DKos deserves great credit.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 07:09 PM Response to Reply #5 |
37. I don't need to see it to believe that this incident happened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
connecticut yankee
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 08:02 PM Response to Reply #5 |
44. It really wasn't that sensational |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 09:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
53. It's a pair of grey trunks with a lump in them. Taken so close up... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rsmith6621
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
7. I Hate CONSERVATIVE HACKS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ck4829
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
8. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
9. Good. It wasn't a joke and it wasn't funny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawson Leery
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
11. Perhaps it is time for Breitbart to go to jail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bette Noir
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:15 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Agreed. And, just this once, I wouldn't yell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckara
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
13. Sue the Hell Out of Them!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deminks
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
14. THIS WAS NOT A PRANK. IT WAS FRAUD DESIGNED TO TAKE THE CONGRESSMAN DOWN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeMc
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:41 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. + 1 nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:50 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. ABSO-FUCKING-LUTELY! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snagglepuss
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 07:08 PM Response to Reply #21 |
36. That has to been written on a rock and delivered to the DNC to be held for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 08:47 PM Response to Reply #36 |
49. Our side HAS TO respond. Whether they want to or not. That's the stock in trade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaysunb
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 09:00 PM Response to Reply #36 |
50. I think I wholeheartedly agree w/ you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beartracks
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 09:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
54. Bingo. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 03:36 AM Response to Reply #14 |
61. That is exactly what it was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 04:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
75. +100 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
15. Interestingly, the entire underbelly of the wingnutariat . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:31 PM Response to Reply #15 |
34. Yeah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 09:03 PM Response to Reply #34 |
51. It's really not that much of a stretch . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frances
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
16. Repubs should have to follow the same rules as Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wielding Truth
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:08 PM Response to Reply #16 |
26. You are so correct! This is character assassination and worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
17. I'll bet there's enough evidence there to make a case for malicious defamation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guilded Lilly
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
19. Send them to Hell Anthony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
20. the girl who received this may have a case too.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Oh yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
23. Breitbart has become the WikiLeaks of right-wing smear jobs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downwinder
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 07:19 PM Response to Reply #23 |
40. More like "The National Observer" of the right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RyanPsych
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
24. Burn that idiot Breitbart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabear
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
25. You cannot make "jokes" like this in today's political climate. He should absolutely pursue this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
27. this action would have to meet the standards of intentional defamation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ck4829
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:16 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Either way, this is going to force Breitbart's hand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:28 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Sounds like us. Debating legal minutiae and semantics while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 07:36 PM Response to Reply #32 |
43. No we don't, we're for Weiner! Go, Anthony, we're behind you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beartracks
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 09:28 PM Response to Reply #27 |
55. That is true. Giving up one's right to privacy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
29. fiasco lasted 5 minutes and i decree that it cannot have -gate status |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
30. Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
31. "Exploring Legal Action" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueCollar
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
33. Good....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Randypiper
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
35. I don't think action will be against Breitbart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 08:46 AM Response to Reply #35 |
65. he may have paid the hacker to do the hit, er, hack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
38. I hope to someday get to vote for Anthony Weiner for President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
39. Since the young woman has suffered threats and harassment, they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
41. invasion of privacy, identification theft, defamation of character...sounds like Breitbart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Plucketeer
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
42. Go gitum, Anthony! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
45. Glad to see legal action |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
46. If it isn't true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
47. Has Breitbart even posted any kind of retraction or even taken down the story? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 09:44 PM Response to Reply #47 |
56. Maybe haven't followed it enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 10:21 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
48. If Weiner is not in anyway guilty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaysunb
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
52. Another reason why, ELECTIONS MATTER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
57. What I don't understand is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 10:28 AM Response to Reply #57 |
71. Because this is considered major push back for Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
58. Breitfart always finds a way to remove himself from it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 02:11 AM Response to Original message |
60. Now, that's how it's done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl_interrupted
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 04:49 AM Response to Original message |
62. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 06:35 AM Response to Original message |
63. I knew the name Breitbart would come up. Sue, Rep. Weiner, sue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedCloud
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 08:38 AM Response to Original message |
64. A Weiner got exposed on the Internet??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
67. Proving who the hacker is should be easy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rayofreason
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 10:08 AM Response to Reply #67 |
69. That's right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
colorado_ufo
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
68. This is actually great news: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bongbong
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
70. Ha ha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinee
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:36 PM Response to Reply #70 |
80. I just had to LOL at this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
72. And just ini case the trail leads right back to O'Keefe and Breitbart.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alp227
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
73. obviously it's a break-in. does this guy even KNOW any college students, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse.com
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
74. It's funny.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duval
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
76. Damn right! Engage FBI! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
77. Deleted message |
bemildred
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
78. This ought to be interesting, I've never seen a guy sue himself before. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cid_B
![]() |
Mon Jun-06-11 10:07 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. There is precedent... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC