Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Executives Dispute Account of Murdoch Son in Hacking Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 10:11 AM
Original message
Executives Dispute Account of Murdoch Son in Hacking Case
Source: NY Times

As the phone hacking scandal in Britain continues to gnaw at Rupert Murdoch’s media empire, a parliamentary panel opened new hearings on Tuesday, seeking to determine who knew about unauthorized voice mail intercepts ordered by the now defunct News of the World tabloid.

Two of four former executives called to testify said they had informed Mr. Murdoch’s son, James, at a 15-minute meeting in 2008 that the use of hacking went further than his company had publicly acknowledged at the time. But one of the executives, Tom Crone, the former legal manager at the tabloid, denied that there had been a cover-up.

-----

Testifying on Tuesday, Mr. Crone, the former legal manager, said the contentious e-mail was “clear evidence that phone hacking was taking place beyond” Clive Goodman, the newspaper’s former royal reporter who was the only journalist who had been publicly identified at that time as having intercepted voice mails. Mr. Goodman and a private investigator, Glenn Mulcaire, both served prison terms in 2007 for hacking the voice mails of members of Britain’s royal family.

“It was the reason we had to settle the case and in order to settle the case, we had to explain the case to Mr. Murdoch and get his authority to settle, so clearly it was discussed,” Mr. Crone told the parliamentary panel. “I can’t remember the conversation and there isn’t a note of it. The conversation lasted about 15 minutes. It was discussed, but exactly what was said I can’t remember.”



Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/07/world/europe/07hacking.html?_r=1&hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. A lying corporate republicon propagandist
How typical
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Evidence 'unclear and contradictory', says News International
News International has hit back at evidence given by former company executives to the culture, media and sport select committee today as part of its phone hacking investigation, calling it "unclear and contradictory".

In a statement issued today, the company's chairman James Murdoch denied claims by former legal manager Tom Crone and former editor of the News of the World Colin Myler that they were certain Murdoch was informed of the "For Neville" email which suggested wrongdoing was more widespread than first thought.

>

"I was told by Mr Crone and Mr Myler when we met, in that short meeting, that the civil litigation related to the interception of Mr Taylor’s voicemails to which Mulcaire had pleaded guilty the previous year.

"I was informed, for the first time, that there was evidence that Mulcaire had carried out this interception on behalf of the News of the World. It was for this reason alone that Mr Crone and Mr Myler recommended settlement. It was in this context that the evidence was discussed. They did not show me the email, nor did they refer to Neville Thurlbeck.

http://www.journalism.co.uk/news/evidence-unclear-and-contradictory--says-news-international/s2/a545924/

Its actually a copy of the email being referred to here : Scotland Yard had the original.

Much of what happened this morning in sequence is here : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-14801587
See narrative on right hand side - now time reversed so's earliest first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's no wonder that it was easy for Crooks and Liars to set up a website
when there are SOOOOO many crooks and liars.

Murdochs...liars...crooks...creeps...thieves...rotten to their very core.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Morlock is doing his best mob boss he can to keep himself from being
directly connected.

Alas, he's failing. all the arrows are slowing pointing directly at him.

I wonder who will have the guts to actually accuse him.

THAT is the 64,000 dollar question.

(yes, I spelled his name morlock. read HG Welles "The Time Machine" and you will know what I mean).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick for the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC