Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bank of America to pay fired whistleblower $930,000

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 05:04 PM
Original message
Bank of America to pay fired whistleblower $930,000
Source: Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Bank of America Corp must reinstate a Countrywide whistleblower fired shortly after the two companies merged in 2008 and pay the employee $930,000, the Labor Department said on Wednesday.

The employee, whose name was not given, led internal investigations that found widespread fraud involving Countrywide employees. Reporting fraud to Countrywide's Employee Relations Department led to retaliation, the employee told the Labor Department.

"It's clear from our investigation that Bank of America used illegal retaliatory tactics against this employee," Occupational Safety and Health Administration Assistant Secretary David Michaels said in a statement.

Bank of America has had a rash of problems related to its 2008 purchase of Countrywide Financial Corp, a major subprime lender accused of churning out loans to high-risk borrowers with little effort to check incomes or ability to repay.


Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/bank-america-pay-fired-whistleblower-930-000-211617907.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pmorlan1 Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great News
Sometimes things turn out like they are supposed to turn out. I hope they lose on appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They will pay the fine w/the salaries of those they will lay off next.
Karma can be good and bad at the same time. The soldiers aren't the only ones laying down their lives for their hateful
"let them die" countrymen. See, I've reframed things: I'm so grateful to be able to share the ultimate sacrifice for their right to kill us by mandate and policy; long live the job-creators of the New American Century! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNLib Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hope this encourages more whistle blowers!
I often feel people are too loyal to their employers and former employers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh! I would like someone to prove that the City and County of San Francisco did that to me twice...
and I would bet if we could access the internal emails, there
were discriminatory comments in HR emails ever since to keep
my great analysis and GAAP accounting skills out of
government.  Any takers on contingency?  
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. SF is very progressive -just ask nicely & say please. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. better get that $ in hard cash-NO checks accepted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. They will pay....$100 each year
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. Whistleblowers and the Obama administration
"But whistle-blower advocates are also concerned by another type of case moving forward on Obama's watch. "Former NSA official Thomas Drake might serve years in prison, not for leaking intelligence, but for telling the Baltimore Sun that the NSA was allegedly wasting taxpayer money on ineffective technologies. He was charged with mishandling classified material and obstructing justice in April 2010. At publication time, the Justice Department had not responded to queries about specific cases.

The prosecutions of those five leakers strike some, like Kucinich, as inconsistent for a President who signed a January 2009 memo to top government executives encouraging more transparency. "The Government should not keep information confidential merely because public officials might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears," Obama wrote. "President Obama came to office promising a new transparency," Kucinich says. "We are getting the opposite."

Others see the prosecutions as a warning shot to leakers a long time in the making. "In every case, the decision to prosecute was made in the Obama Administration even when the alleged disclosure took place years ago," Aftergood says. "I think Obama, like every other President, has been appalled by the unauthorized disclosure of internal Administration deliberations, and he has sent out a signal that they should be forcefully repudiated."

Much more at: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2058340,00.html#ixzz1Y0sljGoy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC